Free The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle

"The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle" Harvard business case study is written by Tara Ceranic, Marc Lampe. It deals with the challenges in the field of Negotiation. The case study is 9 page(s) long and it was first published on : Sep 27, 2015

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that the Humane Society and SeaWorld engage in principled negotiation to find a mutually acceptable solution that addresses the ethical concerns surrounding orca captivity while preserving SeaWorld's financial viability.

2. Background

**Brief summary of the case**The Humane Society, an animal welfare organization, has been campaigning against SeaWorld's practice of keeping orcas in captivity. The Humane Society argues that orcas are highly intelligent and social animals that suffer in captivity. SeaWorld, on the other hand, maintains that its orcas are well-cared for and that the company's educational programs help raise awareness about these animals.

Main protagonists of the case study

  • The Humane Society: An animal welfare organization that has been campaigning against SeaWorld's practice of keeping orcas in captivity.
  • SeaWorld: A marine park operator that has been criticized for its treatment of orcas.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

**Strategic analysis**The Humane Society and SeaWorld are in a strategic conflict. The Humane Society wants to end orca captivity, while SeaWorld wants to continue keeping orcas in captivity. Both organizations have strong constituencies and are unlikely to back down from their positions.

Financial analysisSeaWorld's financial performance has been declining in recent years. The company's revenue has fallen and its profits have declined. This is due in part to the Humane Society's campaign against orca captivity.

Marketing analysisThe Humane Society has been successful in raising awareness about the ethical concerns surrounding orca captivity. This has led to a decline in public support for SeaWorld. SeaWorld has been trying to counter the Humane Society's campaign by emphasizing the educational value of its orcas.

Operational analysisSeaWorld's orcas are kept in captivity in large tanks. The company has a team of veterinarians and trainers who care for the animals. The Humane Society argues that these tanks are too small and that the orcas are not able to engage in their natural behaviors.

4. Recommendaations

We recommend that the Humane Society and SeaWorld engage in principled negotiation to find a mutually acceptable solution that addresses the ethical concerns surrounding orca captivity while preserving SeaWorld's financial viability.

Principled negotiation is a negotiation strategy that focuses on finding a solution that meets the interests of both parties. It is based on the following principles:

  • Separate the people from the problem. This means focusing on the issues at hand, rather than on the personal relationships between the parties.
  • Focus on interests, not positions. This means understanding the underlying needs and concerns of both parties.
  • Generate a variety of options before deciding. This means brainstorming a range of possible solutions that could meet the interests of both parties.
  • Insist on objective criteria. This means using data and evidence to support your positions.
  • Be willing to walk away from the negotiation. This means having a BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) in case you cannot reach an agreement.

We believe that principled negotiation is the best way to resolve the conflict between the Humane Society and SeaWorld. This approach will allow both parties to express their interests, generate a variety of options, and find a solution that meets the needs of both parties.

5. Basis of Recommendaations

Our recommendations are based on the following considerations:
  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The Humane Society's core competency is animal welfare. Its mission is to protect animals from cruelty and exploitation. SeaWorld's core competency is marine animal care and education. Its mission is to provide a fun and educational experience for its guests. Our recommendations are consistent with the missions of both organizations.

  • External customers and internal clients: The Humane Society's external customers are animal lovers and animal welfare advocates. Its internal clients are its members and donors. SeaWorld's external customers are families and tourists. Its internal clients are its employees and shareholders. Our recommendations take into account the interests of all of these stakeholders.

  • Competitors: The Humane Society's main competitor is PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). SeaWorld's main competitor is Disney. Our recommendations will help both organizations to compete more effectively with their rivals.

  • Attractiveness ' quantitative measures if applicable (e.g., NPV, ROI, break-even, payback): We believe that our recommendations will have a positive financial impact on both the Humane Society and SeaWorld. The Humane Society will be able to achieve its goal of ending orca captivity, which will boost its reputation and attract new members and donors. SeaWorld will be able to preserve its financial viability by finding a way to keep orcas in captivity that is acceptable to the public.

  • Are all assumptions explicitly stated (e.g., needs, technology trends)' Our recommendations are based on the following assumptions:

    • The Humane Society and SeaWorld are both committed to finding a mutually acceptable solution.
    • Both organizations are willing to compromise on their positions.
    • There is a viable alternative to orca captivity that meets the needs of both organizations.

6. Conclusion

We believe that our recommendations provide a fair and equitable solution to the conflict between the Humane Society and SeaWorld. We urge both organizations to adopt these recommendations and work together to find a way to end orca captivity while preserving SeaWorld's financial viability.

7. Discussion

**Other alternatives not selected**We considered a number of other alternatives before making our recommendations. These alternatives included:
  • The Humane Society continuing to campaign against SeaWorld until the company agrees to end orca captivity. This alternative is unlikely to be successful, as SeaWorld has a strong financial incentive to keep orcas in captivity.
  • SeaWorld continuing to keep orcas in captivity despite the Humane Society's campaign. This alternative is also unlikely to be successful, as the Humane Society has a strong public relations campaign and is likely to continue to damage SeaWorld's reputation.
  • The Humane Society and SeaWorld agreeing to a compromise that allows SeaWorld to keep a small number of orcas in captivity for educational purposes. This alternative is possible, but it is unlikely to satisfy either organization completely.

Risks and key assumptionsThere are a number of risks and key assumptions associated with our recommendations. These include:

  • The Humane Society and SeaWorld may not be able to reach an agreement. This is the biggest risk associated with our recommendations. If the two organizations cannot agree on a solution, the conflict will continue and both organizations will suffer.
  • The Humane Society may not be able to find a viable alternative to orca captivity. This is another risk associated with our recommendations. If the Humane Society cannot find a way to keep orcas out of captivity, it will be difficult for the organization to achieve its goal of ending orca captivity.
  • SeaWorld may not be able to preserve its financial viability if it ends orca captivity. This is a risk for SeaWorld, as orcas are a major attraction for the company. If SeaWorld cannot find a way to replace the revenue that it generates from orcas, it may be forced to close its doors.

8. Next Steps

We recommend that the Humane Society and SeaWorld take the following steps to implement our recommendations:
  • Appoint a team of negotiators to represent each organization. The negotiators should be experienced and skilled in principled negotiation.
  • Develop a clear agenda for the negotiations. The agenda should include a list of the issues to be discussed and a timeline for reaching an agreement.
  • Meet regularly to negotiate a solution. The negotiations should be conducted in a private and confidential setting.
  • Be willing to compromise. Both organizations will need to be willing to compromise on their positions in order to reach an agreement.
  • Document the agreement in writing. Once an agreement has been reached, it should be documented in writing and signed by both parties.

We believe that by following these steps, the Humane Society and SeaWorld can find a mutually acceptable solution that addresses the ethical concerns surrounding orca captivity while preserving SeaWorld's financial viability.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle

Case Description

In 2016, the respective heads of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. (SeaWorld) were trying to reach a mutually beneficial resolution to their dispute over orca whale breeding. The HSUS opposed SeaWorld's practice of breeding captive orcas and each leader was facing challenges. SeaWorld was experiencing growing negative publicity and a decline in park attendance and revenues, while the HSUS was in the process of publishing a book encouraging business leaders to join the animal protection movement and incorporate HSUS values into their strategic plans. After a decades-long antagonistic relationship, how could SeaWorld and the HSUS find common ground? Could SeaWorld continue operating in a way that was financially beneficial for the parks and entertaining to guests, while also being respectful of the welfare of the orca whales in their care? Could they meet the HSUS's goals of animal protection?

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle

The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - The Humane Society and SeaWorld: Orca Obstacle




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.