Free Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties

"Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties" Harvard business case study is written by Roberto Rafael Luchi, Tomas Garzon de la Roza. It deals with the challenges in the field of Negotiation. The case study is 13 page(s) long and it was first published on : Nov 17, 2020

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a multi-pronged approach to navigate the complex crisis stemming from the oil spill in the Argentine Sea. This approach prioritizes immediate environmental remediation, transparent communication, and a collaborative negotiation process involving all stakeholders. This strategy aims to mitigate environmental damage, restore public trust, and minimize financial and reputational repercussions for all parties involved.

2. Background

This case study focuses on the aftermath of a major oil spill in the Argentine Sea, caused by a collision between an oil tanker and a cargo ship. The spill has significant environmental and economic consequences, impacting fishing communities, tourism, and the overall ecosystem. The case study highlights the complex negotiations that must occur between the involved parties: the oil tanker company (Argentinian-owned), the cargo ship company (Panamanian-owned), the Argentine government, and various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) advocating for environmental protection and the affected communities.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

A. Strategic Framework: This case study can be analyzed through the lens of crisis management and international business negotiations.

B. Key Stakeholders:

  • Argentinian Government: Responsible for environmental protection, disaster response, and representing the interests of its citizens.
  • Oil Tanker Company: Facing potential legal and financial liabilities, reputational damage, and pressure to compensate for the spill.
  • Cargo Ship Company: Potentially liable for the collision and the resulting spill, facing legal and financial repercussions.
  • NGOs: Advocating for environmental protection, representing affected communities, and pushing for accountability.
  • Fishing Communities: Directly impacted by the spill, facing economic hardship and potential long-term damage to their livelihoods.

C. Conflict Points:

  • Liability: Determining the responsible party for the spill and assigning liability for damages.
  • Compensation: Establishing a fair and equitable compensation structure for affected communities and environmental restoration.
  • Environmental Remediation: Agreeing on the scope and timeline for cleaning up the oil spill and mitigating long-term environmental damage.
  • Transparency: Ensuring open communication and information sharing among all parties, building trust and accountability.

D. Power Dynamics:

  • The Argentine government holds significant power due to its regulatory authority and jurisdiction over the affected area.
  • The oil tanker company has economic leverage but faces significant pressure from public opinion and potential legal consequences.
  • The cargo ship company has limited power in this situation, potentially facing legal action and reputational damage.
  • NGOs and fishing communities hold moral authority and can mobilize public opinion to exert pressure on the involved parties.

E. Negotiation Strategies:

  • Principled Negotiation: All parties should focus on finding mutually acceptable solutions based on shared interests, rather than positional bargaining.
  • Integrative Negotiation: Identifying opportunities for win-win solutions that address the needs of all stakeholders, such as joint environmental remediation efforts and sustainable development initiatives.
  • Conflict Resolution: Utilizing mediation techniques and collaborative approaches to address disagreements and facilitate consensus.
  • Transparency and Communication: Openly sharing information, building trust, and fostering a collaborative environment for negotiation.

4. Recommendations

A. Immediate Actions:

  • Environmental Remediation: The oil tanker company, in collaboration with the Argentine government and NGOs, should immediately initiate a comprehensive environmental cleanup plan. This plan should prioritize containment, removal, and long-term monitoring of the oil spill.
  • Compensation: The oil tanker company, in consultation with the government and affected communities, should establish a transparent compensation framework for fishing communities and other impacted businesses. This should include short-term relief measures and long-term support for economic recovery.
  • Public Communication: All involved parties should engage in open and transparent communication with the public, providing regular updates on the situation, the cleanup efforts, and the compensation process. This will help build trust and mitigate public anger.

B. Long-Term Strategies:

  • Joint Venture for Sustainable Development: The oil tanker company, in partnership with the Argentine government and NGOs, should establish a joint venture focused on sustainable development initiatives in the affected region. This could include investments in renewable energy, eco-tourism, and sustainable fishing practices.
  • Environmental Monitoring and Research: The oil tanker company should commit to long-term environmental monitoring and research in the affected area, collaborating with scientific institutions and NGOs to assess the long-term impact of the spill and develop mitigation strategies.
  • Legal Framework: The Argentine government should review and strengthen its legal framework for environmental protection, including regulations for oil transportation, liability for spills, and compensation mechanisms for affected communities.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The oil tanker company's core competency lies in oil transportation. This situation presents an opportunity to demonstrate its commitment to environmental responsibility and sustainable practices, aligning with its mission.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The oil tanker company's external customers include its clients and the broader public. Addressing the crisis effectively will help maintain customer trust and mitigate reputational damage. Internal clients, including employees, will benefit from a transparent and responsible approach to the crisis.
  • Competitors: The oil tanker company's competitors will be watching closely how it handles this crisis. A proactive and responsible approach will set a positive example and enhance its competitive advantage.
  • Attractiveness: The proposed joint venture for sustainable development presents an attractive investment opportunity for the oil tanker company, demonstrating its commitment to environmental responsibility and potentially generating long-term economic benefits.

6. Conclusion

The oil spill in the Argentine Sea presents a complex crisis requiring a collaborative and responsible approach. By prioritizing environmental remediation, transparent communication, and a negotiated solution that addresses the needs of all stakeholders, the involved parties can mitigate the environmental damage, restore public trust, and minimize the financial and reputational repercussions of this disaster. This approach will demonstrate a commitment to environmental sustainability, corporate social responsibility, and responsible international business practices.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Ignoring the crisis: This would lead to severe reputational damage, legal consequences, and potential boycotts.
  • Focusing solely on legal battles: This would be costly, time-consuming, and could further escalate tensions.
  • Prioritizing short-term profits over long-term sustainability: This would exacerbate the environmental damage and erode public trust.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Risk of inadequate compensation: The proposed compensation framework must be fair and equitable to avoid further conflict.
  • Risk of public backlash: Open communication and transparency are crucial to mitigate public anger and maintain trust.
  • Assumption of cooperation: All stakeholders must be willing to collaborate and compromise to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome.

8. Next Steps

  • Immediate action: Establish a crisis management team to coordinate environmental remediation and communication efforts.
  • Negotiation process: Initiate negotiations with all stakeholders, focusing on finding win-win solutions.
  • Joint venture development: Explore the feasibility and structure of a joint venture for sustainable development in the affected region.
  • Long-term monitoring: Implement a comprehensive environmental monitoring and research program to assess the long-term impact of the spill.

By taking these steps, the oil tanker company, the Argentine government, and other stakeholders can navigate this crisis effectively, minimizing its negative impacts and creating opportunities for sustainable development in the region.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties

Case Description

The case aims to exercise skills in decision-making, negotiations, and conflict resolution in extreme crisis management. It is a multi-party negotiation: CEO of the company that produces the spill, national government and municipal government, port authorities, and environmental associations. There is also a multivariable agenda to negotiate: an emergency level to be declared, cleaning operations to be deployed, additional environmental recovery work, provisions in the port area, and compensation mechanisms for the affected communities. The multimedia format allows adding information to extend the discussion of the case to an extreme experience design format with recordings of people involved, filming of affected residents, news in the media, and the impact of social networks.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties

Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - Negotiate in a Crisis: Oil Disaster in the Argentine Sea. General Instructions for All Parties




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.