Free The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR

"The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR" Harvard business case study is written by Charan Devereaux, Robert Lawrence. It deals with the challenges in the field of Negotiation. The case study is 43 page(s) long and it was first published on : Dec 7, 2004

The PNTR agreement was controversial in the United States. Some members of Congress argued that China should not be granted PNTR status because of its human rights record and its unfair trade practices. However, the Clinton administration argued that PNTR status was in the best interests of the United States. The administration argued that PNTR status would help to promote economic growth and job creation in the United States. It also argued that PNTR status would help to improve relations between the United States and China.

The PNTR agreement was eventually approved by Congress in a close vote. However, the agreement has remained controversial. Some members of Congress have continued to argue that China should not have been granted PNTR status. They argue that China has not lived up to its commitments under the agreement. They also argue that the agreement has led to job losses in the United States.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The PNTR agreement has had a significant impact on the US-China relationship. The agreement has helped to increase trade between the two countries. It has also helped to improve relations between the two countries. However, the agreement has also been controversial. Some members of Congress have argued that China should not have been granted PNTR status. They argue that China has not lived up to its commitments under the agreement. They also argue that the agreement has led to job losses in the United States.

The PNTR agreement is a complex issue with no easy answers. There are valid arguments on both sides of the issue. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to grant China PNTR status is a political one.

4. Recommendaations

The United States and China should work together to develop a new bilateral trade agreement that addresses the concerns of both countries. The new agreement should be based on the principles of mutual respect, transparency, and fairness. It should also include provisions that promote economic growth, job creation, and environmental protection.

The new agreement should be negotiated in a transparent and inclusive manner. All stakeholders, including businesses, labor unions, and environmental groups, should have a voice in the process. The agreement should also be subject to regular review to ensure that it is meeting the needs of both countries.

5. Basis of Recommendaations

The recommendations in this case study solution are based on the following considerations:
  • The United States and China are the world's two largest economies. A new bilateral trade agreement between the two countries would have a significant impact on the global economy.
  • The PNTR agreement has been controversial in the United States. Some members of Congress have argued that China should not have been granted PNTR status. They argue that China has not lived up to its commitments under the agreement. They also argue that the agreement has led to job losses in the United States.
  • The United States and China have different economic systems. The United States is a capitalist economy, while China is a socialist economy. This difference in economic systems can lead to misunderstandings and conflict.
  • The United States and China have different political systems. The United States is a democracy, while China is a one-party state. This difference in political systems can also lead to misunderstandings and conflict.

6. Conclusion

The United States and China are two of the most important countries in the world. A new bilateral trade agreement between the two countries would have a significant impact on the global economy. It is important that the two countries work together to develop an agreement that is fair and beneficial to both sides.

7. Discussion

There are a number of other alternatives that could be considered in addition to the one recommended in this case study solution. One alternative would be to simply maintain the status quo. This would mean that the United States and China would continue to trade under the terms of the current PNTR agreement. However, this alternative is not likely to be satisfactory to either country.

Another alternative would be to terminate the PNTR agreement. This would mean that the United States would no longer treat China as a 'most-favored nation' in terms of trade. This would likely lead to a decrease in trade between the two countries. It could also lead to an increase in tensions between the two countries.

A third alternative would be to renegotiate the PNTR agreement. This would allow the two countries to address the concerns that they have with the current agreement. However, it is not clear whether the two countries would be able to reach an agreement that is satisfactory to both sides.

8. Next Steps

The next step is for the United States and China to begin negotiations on a new bilateral trade agreement. The two countries should work together to develop an agreement that is fair and beneficial to both sides. The agreement should be based on the principles of mutual respect, transparency, and fairness. It should also include provisions that promote economic growth, job creation, and environmental protection.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR

Case Description

On December 11, 2001, China became a member of the World Trade Organization. Many say the 1999 US-China bilateral trade agreement and the vote in Congress to permanently establish normal trade relations with China paved the way for China''s WTO accession. Even though China was not a WTO member, the United States had granted China Most Favored Nation trading status (MFN) since 1979. However, under US law, China''s trade status required an annual renewal that often became a focal point in Congress for protests over human rights issues, security concerns, and the growing US trade deficit with China. In order to support China''s WTO accession, the United States had to commit to non-discriminatory treatment by agreeing to make China''s MFN status permanent-known as PNTR or Permanent Normal Trade Status-thereby giving up the right to annual reviews. The vote in Congress generated a lobbying battle on Capitol Hill of historical proportions. Why did PNTR pass? What role should trade agreements play in promoting human rights, enhancing domestic reform, encouraging the rule of law, and promoting national security? How were the US-China bilateral agreement and the PNTR vote linked to other key negotiations? What is the role of trade in advancing America''s economic interests? (Revised August 2005) HKS Case Number 1771.0

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR

The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - The Eagle and the Dragon: The November 1999 US-China Bilateral Agreement and the Battle Over PNTR




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.