Free What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max? Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

MBA Staff Writer
Written by Gary F. Smith
Publish Date: 2024-11-01

Harvard Case - What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?

"What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?" Harvard business case study is written by William W. George, Amram Migdal. It deals with the challenges in the field of Business Ethics. The case study is 23 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jun 28, 2020

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Boeing implement a comprehensive overhaul of its corporate culture, prioritizing ethical leadership, transparency, and stakeholder engagement. This involves a multi-pronged approach encompassing robust ethical frameworks, enhanced regulatory compliance, and a commitment to corporate social responsibility.

2. Background

The Boeing 737 Max crisis unfolded after two fatal crashes within a short period, highlighting serious flaws in the aircraft's design and the company's subsequent response. The case study focuses on the development and certification of the MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System), a flight control system that played a central role in the crashes. The main protagonists are Boeing executives, including CEO Dennis Muilenburg, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), responsible for aircraft certification.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study exemplifies a failure of ethical leadership, corporate governance, and regulatory oversight. The analysis can be structured using the following frameworks:

a) Stakeholder Theory: Boeing failed to adequately consider the interests of all stakeholders, prioritizing shareholder value over the safety of passengers, pilots, and the general public.

b) Ethical Decision-Making: The decision to prioritize cost-effectiveness over safety in the development of the MCAS system demonstrates a clear deviation from ethical decision-making principles.

c) Corporate Responsibility: Boeing's lack of transparency and accountability in the wake of the crashes, coupled with attempts to downplay the severity of the issues, exposed a significant deficit in its understanding of corporate responsibility.

d) Conflicts of Interest: The close relationship between Boeing and the FAA, including the delegation of certification responsibilities to Boeing employees, created a conflict of interest that compromised the integrity of the certification process.

e) Whistleblowing: The case highlights the importance of whistleblowing as a mechanism for exposing wrongdoing. However, the lack of a robust whistleblowing culture at Boeing prevented employees from raising concerns about the MCAS system effectively.

4. Recommendations

a) Establish a Robust Ethical Framework:

  • Code of Conduct: Implement a comprehensive code of conduct emphasizing ethical decision-making, transparency, and accountability.
  • Ethical Leadership Training: Provide mandatory training for all employees on ethical leadership principles, conflict of interest management, and whistleblowing procedures.
  • Independent Ethics Committee: Establish an independent ethics committee to oversee ethical compliance and provide guidance on complex ethical issues.

b) Enhance Regulatory Compliance:

  • Independent Certification Process: Ensure a completely independent certification process, eliminating any potential conflicts of interest.
  • Transparency and Accountability: Publish detailed information about the development and certification of new aircraft systems, ensuring complete transparency.
  • Strengthened Oversight: Increase the FAA's oversight of aircraft manufacturers, including regular audits and independent inspections.

c) Embrace Corporate Social Responsibility:

  • Stakeholder Engagement: Establish a formal process for engaging with all stakeholders, including passengers, pilots, employees, and communities impacted by Boeing's operations.
  • Sustainability and Safety: Prioritize sustainability and safety in all aspects of the business, demonstrating a commitment to responsible operations.
  • Transparency and Communication: Maintain open and honest communication with stakeholders, providing timely and accurate information about any potential risks or issues.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are grounded in the following principles:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The recommendations align with Boeing's core competencies in aircraft manufacturing and its mission to provide safe and reliable transportation.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations prioritize the safety and well-being of external customers (passengers) and internal clients (employees).
  • Competitors: By demonstrating a commitment to ethical practices and corporate responsibility, Boeing can differentiate itself from competitors and regain public trust.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are expected to enhance Boeing's long-term attractiveness to investors and customers by rebuilding trust and ensuring sustainable growth.

6. Conclusion

The Boeing 737 Max crisis underscores the critical importance of ethical leadership, transparency, and corporate responsibility in the business world. By implementing these recommendations, Boeing can rebuild trust with stakeholders, restore its reputation, and ensure a safer future for its passengers and employees.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Ignoring the crisis: This option would have resulted in further damage to Boeing's reputation and potentially led to more accidents.
  • Minimal changes: Implementing only superficial changes would not address the underlying issues and could be perceived as insincere by stakeholders.

Risks:

  • Resistance to change: Some employees and executives may resist the implementation of these recommendations.
  • Increased costs: Implementing these changes could increase costs in the short term.
  • Regulatory scrutiny: The FAA and other regulatory bodies may continue to scrutinize Boeing's operations.

Key Assumptions:

  • Commitment to change: Boeing's leadership must be committed to implementing these recommendations.
  • Stakeholder support: Stakeholders must be willing to engage with Boeing and provide feedback.
  • Regulatory cooperation: The FAA and other regulatory bodies must be willing to collaborate with Boeing on implementing these changes.

8. Next Steps

  • Develop a detailed implementation plan: This plan should include timelines, milestones, and responsible parties.
  • Communicate the changes to stakeholders: Boeing should proactively communicate the changes to all stakeholders, including employees, customers, investors, and the public.
  • Monitor progress and make adjustments: Boeing should regularly monitor the progress of the implementation and make adjustments as needed.

By taking these steps, Boeing can begin to rebuild trust and ensure a safer future for its passengers and employees.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR business ethics case study - What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?

Case Description

This case describes the development of the Boeing 737 Max airplane model and the events leading up to two tragic plane crashes, in which a total of 346 people died: the crash of Lion Air flight 610 on October 29, 2018, in Indonesia, and the crash of Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 on March 9, 2019, in Ethiopia. The evolution of Boeing's organization and management is described, focusing on the span from Boeing's 1997 merger with rival McDonnell Douglas through the development of the 737 Max and the crashes. The case examines the antecedents and possible causes of the crashes, both through the lens of industry and competitive dynamics and through the lens of corporate culture and development processes at Boeing. The development of the 737 Max is described in detail, including the factors and decisions that led to the development of the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), the system that ultimately led to the crashes. Information about Boeing's response and actions during the period between the two crashes is also included in the case.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Ethics case study - What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?

What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max? FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max? ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max? case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max? & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max? solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max? to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max? ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max? case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Ethics case study - What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max?

Top Sellers

Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Business Ethics Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.