Free MBA In Jeopardy (A) Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - MBA In Jeopardy (A)

"MBA In Jeopardy (A)" Harvard business case study is written by Lynn Sharp Paine, HBS Students. It deals with the challenges in the field of Business Ethics. The case study is 16 page(s) long and it was first published on : Sep 21, 2000

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a comprehensive approach to address the ethical dilemma faced by the MBA student, focusing on ethical leadership, transparency, and whistleblowing as key principles. This includes a commitment to corporate social responsibility, stakeholder theory, and ethical decision-making within the university's organizational culture.

2. Background

The case study 'MBA in Jeopardy (A)' presents a scenario where an MBA student, David, discovers unethical practices within his university, Fern Fort University (FFU). These practices involve the manipulation of admission data to inflate the university's rankings, potentially jeopardizing the integrity of the MBA program and the reputation of the institution. David grapples with the ethical dilemma of whether to expose these practices, potentially jeopardizing his own career prospects and facing potential repercussions.

The main protagonists in this case are David, the MBA student, and the university administration, represented by Dean Thompson and the Admissions Committee. The case highlights the conflict between individual ethical values and organizational pressures, particularly in a highly competitive environment.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed using the Stakeholder Theory framework, which emphasizes the importance of considering the interests of all stakeholders involved in a decision-making process. In this case, the stakeholders include:

  • Students: They have a vested interest in the quality and integrity of the MBA program, which is directly impacted by the university's actions.
  • Faculty: They are responsible for delivering the curriculum and maintaining the academic standards of the program.
  • Alumni: Their reputation and career prospects are linked to the university's reputation.
  • University Administration: They are responsible for the overall management and governance of the university, including maintaining its reputation and financial stability.
  • Potential Students: They rely on accurate information to make informed decisions about their education.
  • The Public: The university's actions impact its public image and credibility.

The case study also highlights the importance of ethical leadership, which involves setting a clear ethical tone for the organization and ensuring that ethical principles are integrated into all decision-making processes. The Dean's actions, or inaction, in this case, directly reflect on the university's commitment to ethical conduct.

4. Recommendations

To address the ethical dilemma, we recommend the following actions:

  1. David should report the unethical practices to the appropriate authorities. This could involve contacting the university's ethics committee, the dean, or an independent body like the accrediting agency. This action aligns with the principle of whistleblowing, which encourages individuals to expose unethical behavior within an organization.
  2. FFU should conduct a thorough investigation into the alleged unethical practices. This investigation should be independent and transparent, involving external experts if necessary. The university should also consider implementing a comprehensive code of conduct that clearly outlines ethical expectations for all employees and students.
  3. FFU should take appropriate disciplinary action against any individuals found to be involved in the unethical practices. This could include dismissal, suspension, or other appropriate measures. This action demonstrates the university's commitment to accountability and ethical behavior.
  4. FFU should communicate transparently with all stakeholders about the investigation and its findings. This communication should be clear, concise, and honest, acknowledging the university's shortcomings and outlining the steps being taken to address them. This fosters transparency and builds trust with stakeholders.
  5. FFU should implement a robust system for monitoring and preventing future unethical practices. This could include establishing an ethics hotline, providing ethics training for all employees and students, and regularly reviewing and updating its code of conduct. This proactive approach promotes ethical decision-making and corporate governance.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following principles:

  • Corporate Social Responsibility: FFU has a responsibility to act ethically and transparently, upholding the integrity of its academic programs and protecting the interests of its stakeholders.
  • Stakeholder Theory: The recommendations consider the interests of all stakeholders, including students, faculty, alumni, and the public.
  • Ethical Leadership: The recommendations promote ethical leadership by encouraging transparency, accountability, and ethical decision-making within the university.
  • Transparency: The recommendations emphasize the importance of open communication and transparency in addressing the ethical dilemma.
  • Whistleblowing: The recommendations encourage individuals to report unethical behavior, ensuring that such practices are addressed promptly and effectively.

6. Conclusion

The ethical dilemma faced by David highlights the importance of ethical leadership, transparency, and accountability within organizations. By taking a proactive approach to addressing ethical concerns, FFU can demonstrate its commitment to ethical conduct and protect the integrity of its academic programs. This will ultimately benefit all stakeholders, including students, faculty, alumni, and the university itself.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives to David's situation include:

  • Ignoring the issue: This would allow the unethical practices to continue, potentially harming the university's reputation and the quality of the MBA program.
  • Confronting the individuals involved directly: This could be risky and potentially ineffective, as it might not lead to a resolution.
  • Seeking advice from a trusted advisor: This could provide David with guidance and support, but it might not lead to a concrete solution.

The risks associated with the recommended approach include:

  • Retaliation from the individuals involved: This could lead to negative consequences for David.
  • Damage to David's reputation: This could impact his future career prospects.
  • Negative publicity for the university: This could damage the university's reputation and enrollment.

The key assumptions underlying the recommendations are:

  • David is genuinely concerned about the ethical implications of the practices.
  • The university is committed to addressing ethical concerns.
  • The university has a system in place for investigating and addressing ethical violations.

8. Next Steps

The implementation of these recommendations should be guided by a clear timeline with key milestones:

  • Immediate: David reports the unethical practices to the appropriate authorities.
  • Within 1 week: FFU initiates a thorough investigation into the allegations.
  • Within 2 weeks: FFU communicates with stakeholders about the investigation and its preliminary findings.
  • Within 4 weeks: FFU completes the investigation and takes appropriate disciplinary action against any individuals found to be involved in the unethical practices.
  • Within 6 weeks: FFU implements a comprehensive code of conduct and establishes a robust system for monitoring and preventing future unethical practices.

By taking these steps, FFU can demonstrate its commitment to ethical leadership, transparency, and accountability, ensuring the integrity of its academic programs and protecting the interests of all stakeholders.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR business ethics case study - MBA In Jeopardy (A)

Case Description

The Community Standards Panel of Harvard Business School must determine whether two students have violated the school's community standards, and if so, what sanction would be appropriate. Concerns allegations of plagiarism. In a second-year elective course, two students submitted a joint paper, substantial portions of which were taken nearly verbatim from their sources. The material was not footnoted. However, the sources were listed in the bibliography provided at the end of the paper. The students, who are not from the United States, claim that they followed the citation practices customary in their home country.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - MBA In Jeopardy (A)

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Ethics case study - MBA In Jeopardy (A)

MBA In Jeopardy (A) FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "MBA In Jeopardy (A)" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " MBA In Jeopardy (A) ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The MBA In Jeopardy (A) case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for MBA In Jeopardy (A). Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "MBA In Jeopardy (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for MBA In Jeopardy (A) & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "MBA In Jeopardy (A)" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my MBA In Jeopardy (A) solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - MBA In Jeopardy (A)

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "MBA In Jeopardy (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "MBA In Jeopardy (A)"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study MBA In Jeopardy (A) to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for MBA In Jeopardy (A) ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the MBA In Jeopardy (A) case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "MBA In Jeopardy (A)" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Ethics case study - MBA In Jeopardy (A)




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Business Ethics Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.