Free Charity or Bribery Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Charity or Bribery

"Charity or Bribery" Harvard business case study is written by Eugene Soltes, Brian Tilley. It deals with the challenges in the field of Business Ethics. The case study is 4 page(s) long and it was first published on : Dec 13, 2017

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Sarah, the newly appointed head of the International Development Department, **refuse the donation** from the construction company. This decision should be communicated clearly and transparently to the company, emphasizing the university's commitment to ethical fundraising practices and upholding its code of conduct. Sarah should also initiate a review of the university's existing policies on donations and partnerships to ensure they are robust and aligned with ethical principles. This review should involve key stakeholders, including faculty, staff, and students, to foster a culture of ethical decision-making and transparency within the university.

2. Background

The case study revolves around Sarah, the newly appointed head of the International Development Department at Fern Fort University. She is tasked with securing funding for a new development project in a developing country. A construction company, known for its questionable ethical practices, offers a substantial donation to the university, contingent on the selection of their company for the project. Sarah faces a moral dilemma: accepting the donation would provide crucial funding but compromises the university's ethical principles, while rejecting it could jeopardize the project's success.

The main protagonists are Sarah, the construction company, and Fern Fort University. Sarah is the decision-maker grappling with the ethical implications of accepting the donation. The construction company represents the external pressure to compromise ethical standards for financial gain. Fern Fort University represents the institution's values and its commitment to ethical conduct.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study presents a complex ethical dilemma that can be analyzed through the lens of stakeholder theory. The key stakeholders involved include:

  • Internal Stakeholders: Sarah, the university administration, faculty, staff, and students.
  • External Stakeholders: The construction company, the beneficiaries of the development project in the developing country, the university's alumni, and the broader public.

The decision to accept or reject the donation impacts each stakeholder differently:

  • Sarah: Accepting the donation could advance her career and secure funding for the project, but it would compromise her personal values and potentially damage her reputation. Rejecting the donation could hinder the project's success and potentially lead to negative consequences for her career.
  • University Administration: Accepting the donation could provide financial benefits but could also damage the university's reputation and erode public trust. Rejecting the donation could lead to financial constraints and potential delays in the project.
  • Faculty and Staff: Accepting the donation could provide resources for research and teaching but could also raise ethical concerns about the university's association with a company known for questionable practices. Rejecting the donation could impact their research and teaching activities.
  • Students: Accepting the donation could provide opportunities for internships and research collaborations but could also raise concerns about the university's commitment to ethical values. Rejecting the donation could impact their access to resources and opportunities.
  • Construction Company: Accepting the donation would secure the project and generate revenue for the company. Rejecting the donation would result in lost business opportunities.
  • Beneficiaries: Accepting the donation could lead to the implementation of the development project, benefiting the community. Rejecting the donation could delay or hinder the project, potentially impacting the community's well-being.
  • Alumni and Public: Accepting the donation could damage the university's reputation and erode public trust. Rejecting the donation could demonstrate the university's commitment to ethical values and strengthen its reputation.

The case study also highlights the importance of corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership. Sarah, as a leader, has a responsibility to uphold the university's values and make decisions that align with its commitment to ethical conduct. This includes considering the potential impact of her decisions on all stakeholders, both internal and external.

4. Recommendations

  1. Refuse the donation: Sarah should clearly and firmly communicate the university's decision to decline the donation to the construction company. This decision should be based on the university's commitment to ethical fundraising practices and its code of conduct.
  2. Initiate a review of donation policies: Sarah should propose a comprehensive review of the university's existing policies on donations and partnerships. This review should be conducted with the involvement of key stakeholders, including faculty, staff, and students. The objective is to ensure that the policies are robust, transparent, and aligned with ethical principles.
  3. Develop a transparent and ethical fundraising strategy: Sarah should work with the university administration to develop a transparent and ethical fundraising strategy. This strategy should prioritize partnerships with organizations that share the university's values and commitment to social responsibility.
  4. Promote a culture of ethical decision-making: Sarah should actively promote a culture of ethical decision-making within the International Development Department and the university as a whole. This can be achieved through training programs, workshops, and open discussions on ethical dilemmas.
  5. Engage with stakeholders: Sarah should engage with all stakeholders, including the construction company, the beneficiaries of the development project, and the university community, to explain the university's decision and its commitment to ethical practices. This open communication can help build trust and understanding.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core competencies and consistency with mission: Fern Fort University's mission statement emphasizes its commitment to ethical conduct and social responsibility. Accepting the donation would contradict these core values and undermine the university's reputation.
  2. External customers and internal clients: The university's stakeholders, including alumni, donors, and the broader public, expect ethical behavior from the institution. Accepting the donation would damage these relationships and erode trust.
  3. Competitors: Universities are increasingly competing for funding and resources. By upholding ethical standards, Fern Fort University can differentiate itself from competitors and attract donors who value ethical practices.
  4. Attractiveness ' quantitative measures: While the donation would provide financial benefits, the long-term reputational damage and potential legal risks associated with accepting the donation outweigh these short-term gains.
  5. Assumptions: These recommendations assume that the university is committed to its ethical principles and is willing to prioritize its long-term reputation over short-term financial gains.

6. Conclusion

The case study highlights the importance of ethical decision-making in the context of corporate social responsibility. Sarah's decision to refuse the donation demonstrates her commitment to ethical leadership and her understanding of the university's values. By upholding its ethical principles, Fern Fort University can build a strong reputation, attract ethical partners, and contribute positively to the development of the community.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives to refusing the donation include:

  • Negotiating with the construction company: Sarah could attempt to negotiate with the company to remove the conditionality of the donation. This would require a strong negotiation strategy and a willingness to compromise on certain aspects of the project.
  • Accepting the donation with conditions: Sarah could accept the donation but impose conditions on the construction company, such as requiring them to adhere to specific ethical standards or undergo independent audits. This approach would require careful consideration of the company's willingness to comply with these conditions.

The risks associated with these alternatives include:

  • Damage to the university's reputation: Accepting the donation with conditions could still damage the university's reputation if the company fails to meet these conditions.
  • Legal risks: The university could face legal challenges if it is perceived to be engaging in unethical practices, even if it has imposed conditions on the company.

The key assumption underlying these recommendations is that the university is committed to its ethical principles and is willing to prioritize its long-term reputation over short-term financial gains.

8. Next Steps

  1. Communicate the decision to the construction company: Sarah should promptly inform the construction company of the university's decision to decline the donation, explaining the reasons for this decision.
  2. Initiate the review of donation policies: Sarah should work with the university administration to assemble a committee to review the existing donation policies. This committee should include representatives from faculty, staff, and students.
  3. Develop a communication strategy: Sarah should develop a communication strategy to inform the university community, alumni, and the broader public about the decision to decline the donation and the university's commitment to ethical fundraising practices.
  4. Explore alternative funding sources: Sarah should work with the university administration to explore alternative funding sources for the development project. This could include seeking grants from foundations, government agencies, or other non-profit organizations.
  5. Implement the revised donation policies: Once the review of donation policies is complete, the university should implement the revised policies and ensure that they are communicated to all relevant stakeholders.

By taking these steps, Fern Fort University can demonstrate its commitment to ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility, ensuring that its actions align with its values and its mission.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR business ethics case study - Charity or Bribery

Case Description

Filip Kowalski, a senior manager at the pharmaceutical company Healthgen, leads sales for the firm's Polish division. While pitching Healthgen's products, he develops a relationship with a director of a regional health fund who also runs a private foundation. After a natural disaster, Healthgen- at the request of the director- donated products to help during the crises. After Healthgen wins an important contract, the media alleges that the donation was made to secure support of the regional health director. Were the efforts to boost company sales and support public health a donation or a bribe?

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Charity or Bribery

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Ethics case study - Charity or Bribery

Charity or Bribery FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Charity or Bribery" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Charity or Bribery ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Charity or Bribery case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Charity or Bribery. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Charity or Bribery" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Charity or Bribery & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Charity or Bribery" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Charity or Bribery solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Charity or Bribery

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Charity or Bribery" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Charity or Bribery"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Charity or Bribery to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Charity or Bribery ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Charity or Bribery case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Charity or Bribery" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Ethics case study - Charity or Bribery




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Business Ethics Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.