Free General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)

"General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)" Harvard business case study is written by Michael E. Porter. It deals with the challenges in the field of Strategy. The case study is 15 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jan 1, 1980

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that General Electric (GE) adopt a multifaceted strategy to maintain its competitive advantage in the large turbine generator market. This strategy should focus on leveraging GE's core competencies in technology and innovation, while simultaneously adapting to the evolving industry landscape marked by globalization, environmental sustainability, and digital transformation.

2. Background

This case study examines the intense rivalry between General Electric (GE) and Westinghouse in the large turbine generator market during the 1980s. The market was characterized by high capital investment, long lead times, and a complex sales process. GE, a dominant player, faced increasing competition from Westinghouse, which was aggressively pursuing market share.

The main protagonists in this case are:

  • General Electric (GE): A global conglomerate with a strong presence in the power generation industry. GE held a dominant market share in large turbine generators and was known for its technological prowess and innovation.
  • Westinghouse: A major competitor to GE, aiming to gain market share by offering lower prices and faster delivery times. Westinghouse was also actively pursuing international markets.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

To analyze the situation, we will utilize several frameworks:

a) Porter's Five Forces:

  • Threat of New Entrants: High barriers to entry due to significant capital investment and technological expertise required.
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers: Moderate, as buyers are large utilities with limited alternatives but can negotiate based on price and delivery time.
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Moderate, as suppliers are specialized but can switch to other customers.
  • Threat of Substitutes: Moderate, as other power generation technologies exist but are not always readily available or cost-effective.
  • Rivalry Among Existing Competitors: High, with GE and Westinghouse engaging in intense price competition and product differentiation.

b) SWOT Analysis:

GE:

  • Strengths: Strong brand reputation, technological leadership, global reach, extensive manufacturing capabilities.
  • Weaknesses: High cost structure, complex organizational structure, potential for complacency.
  • Opportunities: Growing demand for power generation, emerging markets, technological advancements in efficiency and sustainability.
  • Threats: Intense competition from Westinghouse, changing regulatory landscape, economic fluctuations.

Westinghouse:

  • Strengths: Lower cost structure, aggressive pricing strategy, focus on international markets.
  • Weaknesses: Limited brand recognition, potential for quality issues, dependence on government contracts.
  • Opportunities: Growing demand for power generation, emerging markets, technological advancements in efficiency and sustainability.
  • Threats: Intense competition from GE, potential for technology gaps, economic fluctuations.

c) Value Chain Analysis:

GE's value chain includes:

  • Research and Development: Investing in new technologies and product development.
  • Manufacturing: Producing high-quality turbine generators with advanced manufacturing processes.
  • Marketing and Sales: Building relationships with utilities and government agencies.
  • Service and Support: Providing ongoing maintenance and upgrades.

d) Business Model Innovation:

Westinghouse was employing a business model innovation strategy by focusing on:

  • Lower Cost Structure: Streamlining manufacturing and reducing overhead costs.
  • Faster Delivery Times: Utilizing lean manufacturing principles and optimizing supply chain management.
  • Aggressive Pricing: Offering competitive prices to attract customers.

4. Recommendations

GE should implement a multi-pronged strategy to maintain its competitive advantage:

a) Enhance Technological Leadership:

  • Invest in R&D: Continuously develop innovative technologies that improve efficiency, reduce emissions, and offer superior performance.
  • Embrace Digital Transformation: Leverage AI and machine learning to optimize manufacturing processes, enhance product design, and provide predictive maintenance services.
  • Develop Sustainable Solutions: Focus on developing turbine generators that comply with stringent environmental regulations and promote renewable energy integration.

b) Optimize Operations and Cost Structure:

  • Streamline Manufacturing Processes: Implement lean manufacturing principles and automation to reduce production costs and lead times.
  • Optimize Supply Chain Management: Enhance global sourcing capabilities and leverage strategic alliances to secure raw materials and components at competitive prices.
  • Improve IT Management: Implement robust information systems to manage data, track performance, and facilitate decision-making.

c) Expand Global Reach and Market Share:

  • Target Emerging Markets: Identify high-growth regions and tailor products and services to meet local needs.
  • Pursue Strategic Alliances: Collaborate with local partners to gain access to new markets, expand distribution networks, and leverage their expertise.
  • Develop a Strong Brand Presence: Build brand awareness through marketing campaigns, industry events, and social media engagement.

d) Enhance Customer Focus and Value Creation:

  • Develop Customized Solutions: Provide tailored products and services to meet specific customer requirements.
  • Offer Comprehensive Support: Provide ongoing maintenance, upgrades, and technical expertise throughout the turbine generator's lifecycle.
  • Build Long-Term Relationships: Foster strong relationships with customers based on trust, reliability, and value creation.

e) Foster a Culture of Innovation and Continuous Improvement:

  • Encourage Employee Engagement: Create a workplace that fosters creativity, collaboration, and a commitment to excellence.
  • Invest in Leadership Development: Develop leaders who champion innovation, embrace change, and inspire employees.
  • Promote a Data-Driven Culture: Encourage the use of analytics and data insights to drive informed decision-making and optimize performance.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a comprehensive analysis of GE's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, and consider the following factors:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations leverage GE's core competencies in technology and innovation, aligning with its mission to be a global leader in power generation.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations focus on enhancing customer value, providing tailored solutions, and building long-term relationships.
  • Competitors: The recommendations address the competitive threat from Westinghouse by focusing on cost optimization, technological leadership, and market expansion.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are expected to improve GE's financial performance by increasing market share, reducing costs, and enhancing profitability.

6. Conclusion

By embracing these recommendations, GE can maintain its competitive advantage in the large turbine generator market. The company must focus on innovation, operational excellence, global expansion, and customer focus to navigate the evolving industry landscape and ensure its long-term success.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Merging with Westinghouse: This could have consolidated market share but would have faced regulatory scrutiny and potential antitrust issues.
  • Exiting the large turbine generator market: This would have been a strategic retreat but would have lost a significant revenue stream and market presence.

Key risks and assumptions associated with the recommended strategy include:

  • Technological advancements: The rapid pace of technological change could disrupt the market and require GE to constantly adapt.
  • Economic fluctuations: Economic downturns could reduce demand for power generation and impact GE's sales.
  • Regulatory changes: New environmental regulations could increase costs and impact GE's product offerings.

8. Next Steps

GE should implement the recommended strategy in a phased approach:

  • Phase 1 (Short-Term): Focus on cost optimization, streamlining manufacturing processes, and expanding into emerging markets.
  • Phase 2 (Medium-Term): Invest in R&D, develop sustainable solutions, and enhance digital capabilities.
  • Phase 3 (Long-Term): Build a strong brand presence, foster a culture of innovation, and solidify GE's leadership position in the industry.

By taking these steps, GE can successfully navigate the challenges and opportunities in the large turbine generator market, ensuring its continued success in the years to come.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)

Case Description

Describes the U.S. large turbine generator industry in early 1963, a period of severe price cutting and depressed industry conditions. Presents data to allow a structural analysis of the industry and an analysis of the strategies of the major players since 1946. The major teaching issue is the process of competitive rivalry in an oligopoly market, particularly the problems of deescalating in a situation of market warfare. This industry is one where the conditions for avoiding warfare are difficult. Subsidiary teaching issues include the structural analysis of capital goods markets and strategy for the market leader in areas like pricing, rate of technological change, and customer focus. After understanding the industry structure, the discussion should turn to what GE can do to extricate itself from the disastrous price cutting afflicting the industry.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)

General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A). Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Stategy Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.