Free Alphabet's Google Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Alphabet's Google

"Alphabet's Google" Harvard business case study is written by Frank T. Rothaermel. It deals with the challenges in the field of Strategy. The case study is 26 page(s) long and it was first published on : Sep 27, 2017

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Alphabet/Google continue its strategy of disruptive innovation and strategic diversification while focusing on sustainable competitive advantage through core competencies in technology and analytics, AI and machine learning, and digital transformation. This strategy should be implemented through a combination of organic growth, strategic alliances, mergers and acquisitions, and global expansion, with a strong emphasis on corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability.

2. Background

This case study examines Alphabet Inc., the parent company of Google, and its journey from a search engine giant to a diversified technology conglomerate. The case highlights Google's phenomenal success in innovation and market dominance through its core business of search, advertising, and cloud computing. However, it also explores the challenges the company faces in maintaining its competitive advantage in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.

The main protagonists are Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and Alphabet, and Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the founders of Google, who are tasked with navigating the company through its next phase of growth and maintaining its leadership position in the face of increasing competition from companies like Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

SWOT Analysis:

Strengths:

  • Strong brand recognition and reputation: Google is a globally recognized brand with a strong reputation for innovation and reliability.
  • Dominant market share in search and advertising: Google holds a dominant market share in search and advertising, generating substantial revenue.
  • Strong financial position: Google has a strong financial position, allowing it to invest in new technologies and acquisitions.
  • Talented workforce: Google attracts and retains top talent in technology, engineering, and research.
  • Advanced technology and analytics capabilities: Google possesses cutting-edge technology and analytics capabilities, enabling it to develop innovative products and services.

Weaknesses:

  • Antitrust concerns and regulatory scrutiny: Google faces increasing antitrust concerns and regulatory scrutiny, potentially impacting its future growth.
  • Dependence on advertising revenue: Google's revenue is heavily reliant on advertising, making it vulnerable to economic downturns and changes in consumer behavior.
  • Privacy concerns: Google's data collection practices have raised privacy concerns, leading to negative public perception.
  • Competition from emerging technologies: Google faces competition from emerging technologies such as blockchain and decentralized platforms.
  • Limited success in some new ventures: Google has faced challenges in some new ventures, such as its social media platform Google+ and its self-driving car project.

Opportunities:

  • Growth in emerging markets: Google can leverage its technology and resources to expand its presence in emerging markets with significant growth potential.
  • Expansion into new markets and industries: Google can explore new markets and industries through acquisitions and partnerships, leveraging its core competencies.
  • Developing new technologies: Google can continue investing in research and development to develop new technologies and stay ahead of the curve.
  • Improving user experience: Google can focus on improving user experience across its products and services, enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty.
  • Leveraging AI and machine learning: Google can leverage its expertise in AI and machine learning to develop innovative products and services in various industries.

Threats:

  • Increased competition from tech giants: Google faces intense competition from other tech giants such as Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft.
  • Changes in consumer behavior: Changes in consumer behavior, such as the rise of mobile-first browsing and the use of ad-blocking software, could impact Google's revenue.
  • Data privacy regulations: Increasing data privacy regulations could limit Google's ability to collect and use user data, affecting its business model.
  • Cybersecurity threats: Google faces cybersecurity threats that could damage its reputation and disrupt its operations.
  • Economic downturns: Economic downturns could impact advertising spending, negatively affecting Google's revenue.

Porter's Five Forces Analysis:

  • Threat of new entrants: The threat of new entrants is moderate. While the technology barrier to entry is high, the market is already saturated with established players.
  • Bargaining power of buyers: The bargaining power of buyers is moderate. While users have a wide range of choices, Google's dominant market share gives it significant leverage.
  • Bargaining power of suppliers: The bargaining power of suppliers is low. Google relies on a diverse range of suppliers, and there are no dominant suppliers in the market.
  • Threat of substitute products: The threat of substitute products is high. There are numerous alternative search engines and advertising platforms available.
  • Rivalry among existing competitors: The rivalry among existing competitors is intense. Google faces fierce competition from other tech giants like Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft, who are constantly innovating and expanding their offerings.

Value Chain Analysis:

Google's value chain consists of the following primary activities:

  • Research and Development: Investing in R&D to develop new technologies and products, including AI, machine learning, and cloud computing.
  • Product Development: Developing and launching new products and services, such as Google Search, Gmail, Android, and Google Cloud.
  • Marketing and Sales: Promoting Google's products and services through various channels, including online advertising, search engine optimization, and social media.
  • Customer Service: Providing support to users and resolving issues related to Google's products and services.
  • Operations: Managing Google's infrastructure, including data centers, servers, and networks.

Business Model Innovation:

Google's business model innovation is based on its ability to leverage its vast data collection capabilities to provide targeted advertising and personalize user experiences. This model has proven highly successful but faces increasing scrutiny due to privacy concerns.

Corporate Governance:

Google's corporate governance is characterized by a strong focus on innovation and long-term growth. The company is known for its employee-centric culture and its commitment to social responsibility.

Mergers and Acquisitions:

Google has a history of strategic acquisitions, including YouTube, Android, and Nest Labs, which have helped expand its product portfolio and market reach.

Strategic Planning:

Google's strategic planning focuses on maintaining its leadership in search and advertising, expanding into new markets and industries, and developing new technologies.

Market Segmentation:

Google targets a wide range of users, from individuals to businesses, through its diverse product offerings.

Blue Ocean Strategy:

Google has successfully created blue oceans by developing innovative products and services that have disrupted existing markets, such as search, advertising, and cloud computing.

Disruptive Innovation:

Google has consistently pursued disruptive innovation by developing new technologies and products that challenge existing paradigms, such as Android and Google Maps.

Balanced Scorecard:

Google uses a balanced scorecard to measure its performance across various dimensions, including financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth.

Core Competencies:

Google's core competencies include:

  • Technology and analytics: Google possesses advanced technology and analytics capabilities, enabling it to develop innovative products and services.
  • AI and machine learning: Google is a leader in AI and machine learning, using these technologies to improve its products and services.
  • Digital transformation: Google has a strong track record of driving digital transformation across various industries.

Diversification:

Google has diversified its business by expanding into new markets and industries, including cloud computing, hardware, and self-driving cars.

Vertical Integration:

Google has vertically integrated its operations by developing its own hardware, software, and services, such as Android, Google Pixel phones, and Google Cloud Platform.

Horizontal Integration:

Google has horizontally integrated its operations by acquiring companies in related industries, such as YouTube, Waze, and DoubleClick.

Strategic Alliances:

Google has formed strategic alliances with companies such as Samsung, LG, and Microsoft to expand its reach and market share.

Outsourcing:

Google outsources certain functions, such as customer support and manufacturing, to focus on its core competencies.

Globalization Strategies:

Google has adopted a globalization strategy by expanding its operations and products to international markets, adapting its offerings to local cultures and languages.

Product Differentiation:

Google differentiates its products and services through their features, functionality, and user experience.

Cost Leadership:

Google aims to achieve cost leadership through economies of scale, efficient operations, and strategic partnerships.

Market Penetration:

Google continues to penetrate existing markets by increasing its market share and expanding its user base.

Market Development:

Google develops new markets by expanding into emerging markets and exploring new industries.

Product Development:

Google invests heavily in product development to create innovative products and services that meet evolving customer needs.

Resource-based View:

Google's resource-based view emphasizes its unique resources and capabilities, such as its technology, data, and talent, as key drivers of its competitive advantage.

Dynamic Capabilities:

Google's dynamic capabilities enable it to adapt to changing market conditions, innovate rapidly, and create new markets.

Scenario Planning:

Google uses scenario planning to anticipate future trends and develop strategies to navigate potential challenges and opportunities.

Stakeholder Analysis:

Google recognizes the importance of its stakeholders, including customers, employees, investors, and government regulators, and strives to meet their expectations.

Strategic Positioning:

Google aims to position itself as a leader in technology and innovation, providing a wide range of products and services that meet the needs of its diverse customer base.

Business Ecosystem:

Google operates within a complex business ecosystem, collaborating with partners, suppliers, and competitors to create value for its customers.

Game Theory in Strategy:

Google applies game theory in its strategic decision-making, considering the actions of its competitors and anticipating their responses.

Strategic Leadership:

Google's leadership team is focused on driving innovation, fostering a culture of excellence, and ensuring the company's long-term success.

Change Management:

Google is adept at managing change, adapting to new technologies, and evolving its business model to meet changing market demands.

Organizational Culture:

Google's organizational culture is characterized by innovation, creativity, and a strong focus on employee well-being.

Strategic Implementation:

Google has a robust strategic implementation process, ensuring that its plans are translated into action and that progress is monitored closely.

Benchmarking:

Google benchmarks its performance against industry leaders to identify areas for improvement and maintain its competitive advantage.

Strategic Control:

Google uses a variety of mechanisms to monitor its performance and ensure that its strategies are achieving the desired results.

PESTEL Analysis:

  • Political: Google faces political challenges related to antitrust concerns, data privacy regulations, and government censorship in some countries.
  • Economic: Economic downturns can impact advertising spending, affecting Google's revenue.
  • Social: Google faces increasing social pressure to address issues such as data privacy, misinformation, and the impact of its technology on society.
  • Technological: Rapid technological advancements create both opportunities and threats for Google, requiring constant innovation and adaptation.
  • Environmental: Google is committed to environmental sustainability and is taking steps to reduce its carbon footprint.
  • Legal: Google operates in a complex legal environment, subject to various regulations and laws.

Industry Lifecycle:

The internet and digital advertising industry is in a mature stage of its lifecycle, characterized by intense competition and consolidation.

Strategic Groups:

Google belongs to the strategic group of leading technology companies, competing with other giants like Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft.

Value Proposition:

Google's value proposition is based on providing users with a wide range of free and paid services, including search, advertising, email, cloud computing, and mobile operating systems.

Business Portfolio Analysis:

Google's business portfolio consists of a diverse range of products and services, including its core search and advertising business, as well as newer ventures such as cloud computing, hardware, and self-driving cars.

BCG Matrix:

Google's business portfolio can be analyzed using the BCG matrix, with its core search and advertising business being a cash cow, while its newer ventures are considered question marks or stars.

Ansoff Matrix:

Google uses the Ansoff matrix to guide its growth strategies, exploring options for market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification.

Strategic Intent:

Google's strategic intent is to be a leader in technology and innovation, providing a wide range of products and services that meet the needs of its diverse customer base.

Sustainable Competitive Advantage:

Google aims to achieve sustainable competitive advantage through its core competencies in technology, analytics, AI, and machine learning, as well as its strong brand recognition and reputation.

Strategic Flexibility:

Google maintains strategic flexibility by adapting to changing market conditions, innovating rapidly, and exploring new opportunities.

Corporate Social Responsibility:

Google is committed to corporate social responsibility, addressing issues such as data privacy, environmental sustainability, and social equity.

Digital Transformation Strategy:

Google is a leader in digital transformation, driving innovation and change across various industries.

Strategic Foresight:

Google uses strategic foresight to anticipate future trends and develop strategies to navigate potential challenges and opportunities.

4. Recommendations

  1. Continue investing in disruptive innovation: Google should continue to invest heavily in research and development to develop new technologies and products that disrupt existing markets and create new opportunities. This includes focusing on areas such as AI, machine learning, quantum computing, and blockchain.
  2. Expand into new markets and industries: Google should leverage its core competencies to expand into new markets and industries, such as healthcare, education, and finance. This can be achieved through organic growth, strategic alliances, and acquisitions.
  3. Embrace globalization: Google should continue to expand its global presence, adapting its products and services to local markets and cultures. This includes investing in local talent and partnerships.
  4. Strengthen its focus on corporate social responsibility: Google should prioritize corporate social responsibility by addressing concerns related to data privacy, environmental sustainability, and social equity. This can be achieved through transparent data practices, responsible AI development, and support for social causes.
  5. Develop a robust digital transformation strategy: Google should develop a comprehensive digital transformation strategy that leverages its technology and expertise to help businesses and organizations across various industries adopt new technologies and improve their operations.
  6. Invest in talent development: Google should continue to attract and retain top talent, investing in training and development programs to foster a culture of innovation and learning.
  7. Enhance its strategic planning process: Google should refine its strategic planning process to ensure that its strategies are aligned with its long-term goals and that progress is monitored closely.
  8. Improve its communication and engagement with stakeholders: Google should enhance its communication and engagement with stakeholders, including customers, employees, investors, and government regulators, to build trust and address concerns.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a comprehensive analysis of Google's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, as well as its industry context and competitive landscape. They are also aligned with Google's mission to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.

The recommendations consider the following factors:

  1. Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations leverage Google's core competencies in technology, analytics, AI, and machine learning, and are consistent with its mission to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.
  2. External customers and internal clients: The recommendations address the needs of Google's customers, including individuals and businesses, and aim to create a positive work environment for its employees.
  3. Competitors: The recommendations consider the competitive landscape and aim to maintain Google's competitive advantage in the face of increasing competition from other tech giants.
  4. Attractiveness ' quantitative measures if applicable (e.g., NPV, ROI, break-even, payback): The recommendations are expected to generate positive returns on investment, although specific quantitative measures are not provided in this analysis.
  5. Assumptions: The recommendations are based on the assumption that Google will continue to invest in innovation, expand into new markets, and prioritize corporate social responsibility.

6. Conclusion

Google is a technology giant with a strong track record of innovation and market dominance. However, the company faces increasing competition and challenges in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. By continuing to invest in disruptive innovation, expanding into new markets and industries, embracing globalization, and prioritizing corporate social responsibility, Google can maintain its leadership position and achieve long-term success.

7. Discussion

Other Alternatives:

  • Focusing solely on its core business: Google could choose to focus solely on its core business of search and advertising, but this would limit its growth potential and expose it to greater risk from competitors.
  • Acquiring a major competitor: Google could acquire a major competitor, such as Facebook or Amazon, but this would face significant regulatory hurdles and could create antitrust concerns.
  • Divesting non-core businesses: Google could divest its non-core businesses, such as its self-driving car project or its hardware division, but this would reduce its diversification and potentially limit its future growth opportunities.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Regulatory scrutiny: Google faces increasing regulatory scrutiny, which could impact its future growth and profitability.
  • Changes in consumer behavior: Changes in consumer behavior, such as the use of ad-blocking software, could negatively impact Google's revenue.
  • Competition from emerging technologies: Emerging technologies, such as blockchain and decentralized platforms, could challenge Google's dominance in certain areas.
  • Economic downturns: Economic downturns could impact advertising spending, negatively affecting Google's revenue.

Options Grid:

OptionAdvantagesDisadvantagesRisks
Continue investing in disruptive innovationMaintain leadership in technology, create new marketsHigh investment costs, potential for failureRegulatory scrutiny, competition from emerging technologies
Expand into new markets and industriesDiversify revenue streams, reduce reliance on advertisingIncreased complexity, potential for failureCompetition, regulatory hurdles
Embrace globalizationAccess new markets, increase revenueCultural challenges, regulatory differencesPolitical instability, economic downturns
Strengthen its focus on corporate social responsibilityImprove brand reputation, attract talentIncreased costs, potential for backlashPublic scrutiny, reputational damage
Develop a robust digital transformation strategyHelp businesses adopt new technologies, increase revenueHigh investment costs, potential for failureCompetition, regulatory hurdles
Invest in talent developmentAttract and retain top talent, foster innovationHigh costs, potential for talent poachingEconomic downturns, competition for talent
Enhance its strategic planning processEnsure alignment with long-term goals, improve decision-makingTime-consuming, potential for bureaucracyChanges in market conditions, unforeseen events
Improve its communication and engagement with stakeholdersBuild trust, address concernsTime-consuming, potential for miscommunicationPublic scrutiny, reputational damage

8. Next Steps

  1. Develop a detailed strategic plan: Google should develop a detailed strategic plan that outlines its goals, strategies, and action plans for the next 5-10 years.
  2. Allocate resources: Google should allocate resources to support its strategic initiatives, including research and development, new market expansion, and corporate social responsibility programs.
  3. Monitor progress: Google should regularly monitor its progress against its strategic goals and make adjustments as needed.
  4. Communicate with stakeholders: Google should communicate its strategic plans and progress to its stakeholders, including customers, employees, investors, and government regulators.

By taking these steps, Google can continue to innovate, grow, and maintain its leadership position in the technology industry while addressing the challenges and opportunities of the digital age.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Alphabet's Google

Case Description

The case is written from the perspectives of Larry Page, CEO of Alphabet and Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google. The case focuses on opportunities and challenges faced by Alphabet's largest business unit, Google. Competition in Google's advertising space has intensified, mostly by the way of Facebook. This poses a threat because Google still secures more than 90 percent of Alphabet's profits and revenues. The case also highlights challenges of managing a multi-business conglomerate pursuing an unrelated diversification strategy. As Alphabet continues to implement an M-form structure to administer unrelated diversified, the adjacent business units will have a significant impact on Google. Most notably, the Waymo subsidiary has the potential to enter a multibillion-dollar market. The uncertainty of this venture along with Google's core competencies present new opportunities and challenges to the firm. There is also the question if Alphabet can manage this new structure while securing future growth and profitability.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Alphabet's Google

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Alphabet's Google

Alphabet's Google FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Alphabet's Google" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Alphabet's Google ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Alphabet's Google case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Alphabet's Google. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Alphabet's Google" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Alphabet's Google & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Alphabet's Google" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Alphabet's Google solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Alphabet's Google

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Alphabet's Google" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Alphabet's Google"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Alphabet's Google to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Alphabet's Google ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Alphabet's Google case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Alphabet's Google" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Alphabet's Google




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Stategy Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.