Free The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One

"The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One" Harvard business case study is written by Folkert Mulder, Steffen Giessner. It deals with the challenges in the field of Human Resource Management. The case study is 14 page(s) long and it was first published on : Sep 11, 2022

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a comprehensive Talent Management strategy for the Tokyo 2021 Olympic Games Organizing Committee (Tokyo 2020). This strategy will focus on attracting, developing, and retaining a diverse and highly skilled workforce, while fostering a culture of collaboration, innovation, and excellence. This will involve a multi-pronged approach encompassing strategic HR planning, leadership development, organizational development, performance management, employee engagement, and diversity and inclusion initiatives.

2. Background

The Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games Organizing Committee faced significant challenges in the lead-up to the Games, including the COVID-19 pandemic, budget constraints, and a complex organizational structure. The case study highlights the need for effective talent management to address these challenges and ensure the success of the Games. The main protagonists are Toshiro Muto, the CEO of the Tokyo 2020 Organizing Committee, and the various stakeholders involved in the Games' organization, including volunteers, athletes, sponsors, and government officials.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study reveals several critical issues:

  • Lack of a cohesive talent management strategy: The Organizing Committee lacked a clear plan for attracting, developing, and retaining talent, leading to difficulties in finding and managing the right people for the right roles.
  • Organizational structure and design challenges: The complex organizational structure with multiple stakeholders and layers of bureaucracy hindered effective communication, collaboration, and decision-making.
  • Leadership challenges: The leadership team lacked experience in managing large-scale events and struggled to effectively delegate tasks, motivate employees, and foster a collaborative environment.
  • Diversity and inclusion issues: The Organizing Committee lacked a diverse workforce, potentially limiting its ability to tap into a wider pool of talent and perspectives.
  • Change management challenges: The rapid changes and unexpected events, such as the pandemic, required agile and adaptable leadership, which was lacking in the initial stages.

Applying the SWOT framework:

Strengths:

  • Strong national support and government backing
  • Experienced volunteers and staff in specific areas
  • Established infrastructure and resources

Weaknesses:

  • Lack of a cohesive talent management strategy
  • Complex organizational structure and bureaucracy
  • Leadership challenges and lack of experience in managing large-scale events
  • Diversity and inclusion issues
  • Change management challenges

Opportunities:

  • Leverage technology and analytics for efficient operations
  • Foster a culture of innovation and collaboration
  • Enhance employee engagement and motivation
  • Develop a robust succession planning strategy
  • Embrace diversity and inclusion to attract and retain top talent

Threats:

  • Budget constraints and financial pressures
  • Potential for delays and disruptions due to unforeseen circumstances
  • Competition from other major sporting events
  • Negative media coverage and public perception

4. Recommendations

Strategic HR Planning:

  • Develop a comprehensive talent management strategy: This strategy should outline the organization's talent needs, recruitment strategies, training and development programs, performance management system, and employee retention initiatives.
  • Conduct a thorough job analysis: Identify the specific skills, knowledge, and experience required for each role within the organization.
  • Implement a robust workforce planning system: This system should forecast future talent needs, identify potential skill gaps, and develop strategies to address them.

Recruitment Strategies:

  • Expand the recruitment pool: Utilize various channels to attract a diverse range of candidates, including online platforms, social media, and professional networks.
  • Develop a strong employer brand: Highlight the unique opportunities and benefits of working for the Organizing Committee, emphasizing its mission, values, and commitment to excellence.
  • Implement a structured interview process: Ensure that all candidates are evaluated consistently based on pre-defined criteria and competencies.

Leadership Development:

  • Invest in leadership training and development programs: Equip leaders with the skills and knowledge needed to manage complex projects, motivate teams, and foster a collaborative environment.
  • Promote a culture of mentorship and coaching: Encourage senior leaders to mentor and coach junior staff, providing them with guidance and support.
  • Develop a succession planning strategy: Identify and groom potential leaders for future roles within the organization.

Organizational Development:

  • Streamline the organizational structure: Simplify the structure and reduce bureaucratic layers to enhance communication, collaboration, and decision-making.
  • Foster a culture of collaboration and innovation: Encourage cross-functional teams, knowledge sharing, and creative problem-solving.
  • Implement a performance management system: Establish clear performance expectations, provide regular feedback, and recognize and reward high performers.

Employee Engagement:

  • Develop employee engagement initiatives: Implement programs that foster a sense of belonging, purpose, and pride among employees.
  • Provide opportunities for career advancement: Create pathways for employees to develop their skills and advance within the organization.
  • Offer competitive compensation and benefits: Ensure that employees are fairly compensated and provided with benefits that meet their needs.

Diversity and Inclusion:

  • Promote diversity and inclusion at all levels: Implement policies and practices that ensure equal opportunities for all employees, regardless of gender, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation.
  • Develop a diversity and inclusion training program: Educate employees on the importance of diversity and inclusion, and provide them with the tools and resources to create a more inclusive workplace.
  • Establish a diversity and inclusion council: Create a forum for employees to discuss diversity and inclusion issues and provide feedback on initiatives.

Change Management:

  • Communicate effectively and transparently: Keep employees informed about changes and provide them with the necessary support to adapt.
  • Involve employees in the change process: Seek input from employees and involve them in decision-making to ensure buy-in and ownership.
  • Provide training and development opportunities: Equip employees with the skills and knowledge they need to thrive in a changing environment.

Technology and Analytics:

  • Leverage technology to enhance efficiency and effectiveness: Implement systems for talent management, performance tracking, communication, and collaboration.
  • Utilize data analytics to inform decision-making: Track key performance indicators (KPIs) related to talent management, such as employee satisfaction, retention rates, and diversity metrics.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations align with the Organizing Committee's mission to deliver successful and memorable Olympic Games.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations address the needs of various stakeholders, including volunteers, athletes, sponsors, and government officials.
  • Competitors: The recommendations aim to ensure that the Organizing Committee remains competitive in attracting and retaining top talent compared to other major sporting events.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are expected to improve employee engagement, retention rates, and overall organizational performance.

Assumptions:

  • The Organizing Committee is committed to investing in talent management initiatives.
  • The leadership team is willing to embrace change and adopt a more collaborative and inclusive leadership style.
  • Employees are receptive to new initiatives and are motivated to contribute to the success of the Games.

6. Conclusion

By implementing a comprehensive talent management strategy, the Tokyo 2020 Organizing Committee can overcome its challenges, attract and retain a highly skilled and diverse workforce, and ensure the successful delivery of the Olympic Games. This strategy will involve a multi-pronged approach encompassing strategic HR planning, leadership development, organizational development, performance management, employee engagement, and diversity and inclusion initiatives.

7. Discussion

Other Alternatives:

  • Outsourcing HR functions: This could reduce costs and provide access to specialized expertise, but it could also lead to a loss of control over talent management processes.
  • Adopting a more decentralized organizational structure: This could empower employees and improve decision-making, but it could also lead to inconsistencies and coordination challenges.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Budget constraints: The implementation of these recommendations may require significant financial investment.
  • Resistance to change: Some employees may resist changes to the organizational structure or processes.
  • Lack of leadership commitment: The success of these initiatives depends on the commitment and support of the leadership team.

8. Next Steps

  • Develop a detailed implementation plan: Outline the specific actions, timelines, and resources required to implement each recommendation.
  • Secure leadership buy-in: Gain the support of the CEO and other key leaders for the talent management strategy.
  • Communicate the strategy to employees: Inform employees about the changes and the rationale behind them.
  • Monitor progress and make adjustments as needed: Track key performance indicators and make adjustments to the strategy based on the results.

By taking these steps, the Tokyo 2020 Organizing Committee can build a strong and capable workforce, fostering a culture of collaboration, innovation, and excellence, ultimately ensuring the success of the Olympic Games.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One

Case Description

This case follows the National Field Hockey team's journey from the preparation for the 2016 Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro up to the 2021 Olympics in Tokyo. The case describes the process of rebuilding cohesion among the players, addressing issues of team development and leadership development. The culture and mindset change within the team is seen from the perspective of Jim Carousa, an independent advisor on strategy and organisational change.The team's coach had asked Jim to support him in building an outperforming team. Jim's task was to establish trust among the team by developing a clear direction and effective interaction among the players and coaching staff. How did he handle this challenging task? Moreover, how did he manage to re-align a dysfunctional team and establish strong and effective leadership for it? What was his approach, and what are the key lessons from this process? The case consists of four parts. Case A looks at what happened during the Olympics in Rio de Janeiro that caused the team to lose the game; it then explains Jim's thinking in the following months as he questioned how to solve the challenges the team was facing. Case B describes the team's development as they solved key challenges in team dynamics, leadership and team culture. Case C illustrates the emergence of a new leadership team. Case D describes the aftermath of the team development process and the consequences for the team when, due to the postponement of the Olympic Games in Tokyo, they needed to continue for another year. By addressing these challenges candidly, this case provides valuable insights to anyone who is involved in or concerned about change management in a complex environment.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One

The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - The Road to the Olympic Games Tokyo 2021 (A-D): Why Many Heads Are Better than One




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.