Free A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

MBA Staff Writer
Written by Gary F. Smith
Publish Date: 2024-12-01

Harvard Case - A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)

"A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)" Harvard business case study is written by Abhijeet Vadera, Sin Mei Cheah, Mahima Rao-Kachroo. It deals with the challenges in the field of Business Ethics. The case study is 10 page(s) long and it was first published on : Aug 14, 2023

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Jan Marsalek, the Chief Operating Officer of Wirecard, take immediate action to address the potential fraud and misconduct within the company. This action should include:

  • Reporting the suspected fraud to the appropriate authorities: This includes both internal and external bodies, such as the company's audit committee, the German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), and potentially law enforcement agencies.
  • Seeking legal counsel: Engaging with legal professionals to understand the implications of the potential fraud and the legal obligations surrounding whistleblowing.
  • Documenting all evidence: Gathering and preserving all evidence related to the suspected fraud, including emails, documents, and any other relevant information.
  • Protecting himself and his family: Taking necessary precautions to ensure personal safety and privacy, as whistleblowers can face retaliation.

2. Background

This case study focuses on Jan Marsalek, the Chief Operating Officer of Wirecard, a German payment processing company. In 2019, Marsalek receives an anonymous tip alleging that Wirecard is engaging in fraudulent activities, including inflating its revenue and profits through fictitious transactions. Marsalek is faced with a difficult dilemma: whether to ignore the tip, investigate it internally, or report it to external authorities.

The main protagonists are:

  • Jan Marsalek: Wirecard's Chief Operating Officer, grappling with the ethical implications of the potential fraud and the potential consequences of whistleblowing.
  • Wirecard: The company itself, facing a potential crisis of credibility and legitimacy.
  • The anonymous tipster: The individual who brought the allegations to light, risking their own safety and anonymity.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study highlights several key issues related to corporate responsibility, ethical leadership, and whistleblowing.

Ethical Framework: The case study can be analyzed through the lens of stakeholder theory, which emphasizes the importance of considering the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, investors, and the wider community. Marsalek's decision-making process should be guided by principles of transparency, accountability, and integrity.

Corporate Governance: The case study raises concerns about corporate governance at Wirecard. The company's internal controls and financial reporting processes appear to be inadequate, allowing for potential fraud to occur. This highlights the importance of strong corporate governance structures, including independent audit committees and robust internal controls, to prevent and detect fraud.

Whistleblowing: Marsalek's dilemma underscores the importance of whistleblowing in corporate governance. Whistleblowers play a crucial role in exposing wrongdoing and holding companies accountable. However, they often face significant risks and challenges, including retaliation, social stigma, and legal repercussions.

Risk Management: The case study demonstrates the need for effective risk management practices. Wirecard's failure to identify and mitigate the risks associated with potential fraud highlights the importance of proactive risk assessment and mitigation strategies.

Business Ethics: The case study raises fundamental questions about business ethics and the role of ethical leadership. Marsalek's decision to investigate the allegations is a testament to his commitment to ethical conduct. However, the case also highlights the challenges of navigating ethical dilemmas in a complex business environment.

4. Recommendations

  1. Immediate Investigation: Marsalek should initiate a thorough internal investigation into the allegations of fraud. This investigation should be independent, transparent, and conducted by qualified professionals with expertise in fraud detection and investigation.
  2. Engage External Experts: If the internal investigation reveals evidence of fraud, Marsalek should engage with external experts, including forensic accountants, lawyers, and potentially law enforcement agencies.
  3. Report to Authorities: If the investigation confirms the allegations, Marsalek has a legal and ethical obligation to report the fraud to the appropriate authorities, including the company's audit committee, BaFin, and potentially law enforcement agencies.
  4. Transparency and Communication: Marsalek should be transparent with the company's stakeholders about the investigation and its findings. This includes informing investors, employees, and the public about the potential fraud and the steps being taken to address it.
  5. Implement Corrective Measures: If the investigation confirms fraud, Wirecard must implement corrective measures to address the root causes of the fraud and prevent future occurrences. This may include strengthening internal controls, improving financial reporting processes, and enhancing corporate governance practices.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: Wirecard's core competency is providing secure and reliable payment processing services. Fraud undermines these core competencies and damages the company's reputation.
  2. External Customers and Internal Clients: Wirecard's customers, including merchants and consumers, rely on the company's integrity and trustworthiness. Fraud can erode customer confidence and lead to significant financial losses.
  3. Competitors: Wirecard operates in a competitive industry. Fraud can damage the company's reputation and make it more difficult to compete in the market.
  4. Attractiveness: The potential consequences of not addressing the allegations of fraud are significant, including fines, legal penalties, reputational damage, and potential bankruptcy. Taking immediate action to investigate and address the allegations is essential to protect the company's long-term sustainability.

6. Conclusion

This case study demonstrates the importance of ethical leadership, corporate responsibility, and whistleblowing in ensuring the integrity of businesses. By taking immediate action to investigate the allegations of fraud and report them to the appropriate authorities, Jan Marsalek can demonstrate his commitment to ethical conduct and protect the interests of all stakeholders.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Ignoring the tip: This option would be unethical and potentially illegal. It could also lead to a significant escalation of the fraud and a greater risk of harm to the company and its stakeholders.
  • Internal investigation only: This option could be insufficient if the fraud is widespread or involves senior management. It could also raise concerns about the independence and impartiality of the investigation.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Retaliation: Whistleblowers can face retaliation from the company or individuals involved in the fraud.
  • Legal consequences: There may be legal consequences for both the whistleblower and the company, depending on the nature of the fraud and the actions taken.
  • Reputational damage: The allegations of fraud could damage Wirecard's reputation and lead to a loss of customer confidence.

8. Next Steps

  1. Immediate Investigation: Initiate a thorough internal investigation within 2 weeks.
  2. Engage External Experts: If necessary, engage external experts within 4 weeks.
  3. Report to Authorities: If the investigation confirms fraud, report to the appropriate authorities within 1 week of the confirmation.
  4. Transparency and Communication: Issue a public statement about the investigation and its findings within 1 week of initiating the investigation.
  5. Implement Corrective Measures: Develop and implement corrective measures within 6 months of confirming the fraud.

By taking these steps, Jan Marsalek can demonstrate his commitment to ethical leadership and ensure that Wirecard takes appropriate action to address the allegations of fraud.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR business ethics case study - A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)

Case Description

The two-part case follows the story of Pav Gill, the whistleblower who helped uncover one of Europe's largest corporate frauds at Wirecard, the German fintech that went bankrupt in 2020. Founded in 1999, Wirecard grew from an inconspicuous company to a listed firm on the blue-chip DAX, Germany's main stock index in 2018. Wirecard's meteoric rise to fame was questioned by some but largely acclaimed by investors who knew little about its murky dealings beneath its successful façade. Part (A) begins in 2018 with Gill joining Wirecard's Singapore office as the Head of Legal for the Asia Pacific region. Within a few months, Gill discovered multiple instances of falsified accounts, forgery, back-dated invoices, round-tripping, and questionable hiring practices. Despite escalating the matter to the Munich headquarters, his efforts on speaking up for justice backfired. Even after he left Wirecard, he was stalked by strangers and sabotaged at job interviews. At that point, he had to decide if he should remain silent or expose the scandal, and if so, how. Part (B) describes the frustration of Sokhbir Kaur, Gill's mother, at Wirecard's harassment and threats to her son's life, before resorting to take matters into her own hands. She initiated contact with well-reputed journalists to expose the scandal-a move that stunned Gill. The Financial Times eventually interviewed them and published the story in January 2019, which spelled the beginning of the end for Wirecard.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Ethics case study - A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)

A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A). Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Ethics case study - A Whistleblower's Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A)

Top Sellers

Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Business Ethics Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.