Free Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus

"Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus" Harvard business case study is written by John L. Ward, Carol Adler Zsolnay. It deals with the challenges in the field of Strategy. The case study is 10 page(s) long and it was first published on : Aug 16, 2016

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a multi-pronged approach for Plymouth Tube Company to build ownership consensus around its growth strategy. This involves a combination of strategic planning, communication, employee empowerment, and performance-based incentives.

2. Background

Plymouth Tube Company, a leading manufacturer of steel tubing, is facing a critical juncture. The company is seeking to expand its operations and enter new markets, but it faces resistance from its employees and management. The case study highlights the challenge of building consensus around a new strategy, particularly when it involves significant change and potential disruption to existing processes.

The main protagonists in the case are:

  • John D. 'Jack' Heidrich, the CEO, who is pushing for growth and expansion.
  • The management team, who are divided on the best path forward.
  • The employees, who are concerned about job security and potential changes to their working conditions.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

To understand the situation, we can apply several frameworks:

3.1. SWOT Analysis:

  • Strengths: Strong brand reputation, experienced workforce, established manufacturing processes, strong financial position.
  • Weaknesses: Resistance to change, lack of clear communication, limited experience in new markets.
  • Opportunities: Expanding into new markets, diversifying product offerings, leveraging technology for process optimization.
  • Threats: Increased competition, economic downturn, regulatory changes, technological disruption.

3.2. Porter's Five Forces:

  • Threat of new entrants: Moderate, due to high capital investment required for manufacturing.
  • Bargaining power of buyers: Moderate, as there are alternative suppliers, but Plymouth Tube holds a strong brand position.
  • Bargaining power of suppliers: Moderate, as steel is a commodity, but Plymouth Tube has established relationships with suppliers.
  • Threat of substitute products: Moderate, as alternative materials like aluminum or plastic are available.
  • Rivalry among existing competitors: High, as the steel tubing market is fragmented and highly competitive.

3.3. Value Chain Analysis:

Plymouth Tube's value chain can be broken down into:

  • Inbound logistics: Sourcing raw materials (steel) and managing supplier relationships.
  • Operations: Manufacturing processes, including cutting, bending, and welding.
  • Outbound logistics: Shipping and distribution of finished products.
  • Marketing and sales: Reaching customers and securing orders.
  • Service: Providing technical support and after-sales service.

3.4. Business Model Innovation:

Plymouth Tube can consider exploring new business models, such as:

  • Value-added services: Offering engineering and design services to customers.
  • Direct-to-consumer sales: Bypassing distributors and selling directly to end-users.
  • Subscription-based models: Offering recurring revenue streams through maintenance contracts or product-as-a-service.

3.5. Corporate Governance:

The case highlights the importance of effective corporate governance in ensuring alignment between the company's strategy and its stakeholders' interests. This includes:

  • Transparency: Communicating the company's vision and strategy clearly to all stakeholders.
  • Accountability: Holding management responsible for achieving strategic objectives.
  • Employee engagement: Involving employees in the decision-making process and providing them with opportunities for growth.

4. Recommendations

To build ownership consensus, Plymouth Tube should implement the following recommendations:

4.1. Strategic Planning:

  • Develop a clear and concise growth strategy: This should outline the company's vision, objectives, and key initiatives for expansion.
  • Conduct thorough market research: Identify potential new markets, assess competitive landscape, and understand customer needs.
  • Develop a detailed implementation plan: Define specific actions, timelines, and resources required for each initiative.

4.2. Communication:

  • Communicate openly and transparently: Share the company's vision, strategy, and plans with all employees.
  • Address concerns and answer questions: Provide opportunities for employees to voice their concerns and receive clear answers.
  • Use multiple communication channels: Leverage internal newsletters, town hall meetings, and online platforms to disseminate information.

4.3. Employee Empowerment:

  • Involve employees in the decision-making process: Create forums for employees to provide input and feedback on strategic initiatives.
  • Provide training and development opportunities: Equip employees with the skills and knowledge required to adapt to new processes and technologies.
  • Recognize and reward employee contributions: Acknowledge and celebrate employee achievements, fostering a sense of ownership and commitment.

4.4. Performance-Based Incentives:

  • Align employee compensation with strategic objectives: Link performance bonuses and rewards to the achievement of key performance indicators (KPIs) related to the growth strategy.
  • Offer equity participation: Consider providing employees with stock options or other forms of equity ownership to align their interests with the company's long-term success.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations focus on leveraging Plymouth Tube's existing strengths, such as its manufacturing expertise and strong brand reputation, while expanding into new markets.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations prioritize understanding customer needs and involving employees in the decision-making process to ensure alignment with all stakeholders.
  • Competitors: The recommendations emphasize the need to stay ahead of the competition by investing in innovation, technology, and new market opportunities.
  • Attractiveness - quantitative measures: The recommendations are expected to generate positive returns on investment (ROI) through increased market share, revenue growth, and improved profitability.

6. Conclusion

By implementing these recommendations, Plymouth Tube can build ownership consensus around its growth strategy. This will enable the company to achieve its strategic objectives, navigate the competitive landscape, and secure its long-term success.

7. Discussion

Alternatives not selected:

  • Aggressive cost-cutting: While cost reduction measures can be considered, they may not be sustainable in the long run and could negatively impact employee morale.
  • Mergers and acquisitions: While M&A can be a fast track to growth, it can also be risky and require significant resources.

Risks and key assumptions:

  • Resistance to change: Employees may resist changes to their roles and responsibilities, requiring effective communication and change management strategies.
  • Economic downturn: A downturn in the economy could impact demand for steel tubing, requiring the company to adapt its strategy.
  • Technological disruption: New technologies could emerge that disrupt the steel tubing industry, necessitating continuous innovation and adaptation.

8. Next Steps

Timeline:

  • Months 1-3: Develop a comprehensive growth strategy, conduct market research, and communicate the plan to employees.
  • Months 4-6: Implement key initiatives, including product development, market expansion, and technology upgrades.
  • Months 7-9: Monitor progress, adjust the strategy as needed, and celebrate employee achievements.
  • Months 10-12: Evaluate the impact of the growth strategy and make further adjustments for long-term sustainability.

Key Milestones:

  • Completion of market research and strategy development.
  • Launch of new products or services.
  • Expansion into new markets.
  • Implementation of technology upgrades.
  • Achievement of key performance indicators (KPIs) related to the growth strategy.

By following these recommendations and implementing them effectively, Plymouth Tube can build ownership consensus, achieve its growth objectives, and secure its future in the competitive steel tubing industry.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

Plymouth Tube, a family business, was a manufacturer of precision tubing and extruded shapes for aerospace, desalination, medical, mining, energy, and water industries globally. Founded in 1924, as of 2012 it employed 770 people at thirteen plants in seven U.S. states and had sales of about $240 million. The family had twenty members across three generations, including spouses. The board was composed of eight members, three from the family and five who were independent. Stacy, age 30, was the only fifth-generation family member working for the company. Her father, Van, age 64 and a fourth-generation member, had been in the business for forty years and had succeeded his father as president, CEO, and chairman. In early 2013, management presented a very large expansion project that was riskier than previous recent investments to the board, and requested the board's approval. Independent board members asked Van to obtain feedback from the family about the proposal. Van asked Stacy to direct the process for informing the family, asking for their input, and communicating it back to the board. How should Stacy conduct the process? What should be done with the information once it has been gathered? Should family members be involved in this type of business decision? Based on the information given in the case, is this a good investment?

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus

Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Plymouth Tube Company: How to Build Ownership Consensus




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Stategy Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.