Free Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader

"Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader" Harvard business case study is written by Bertrand Guillotin. It deals with the challenges in the field of Strategy. The case study is 12 page(s) long and it was first published on : Dec 4, 2018

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Ford adopt a multi-pronged strategy to address the competitive threat posed by Geely. This strategy involves embracing digital transformation, redefining its core competencies, and repositioning its brand to cater to evolving consumer preferences in a rapidly changing automotive landscape.

2. Background

This case study explores the rise of Geely, a Chinese automotive manufacturer, and its challenge to the established dominance of Ford in the global market. Geely's rapid growth, driven by strategic acquisitions, technological innovation, and a focus on emerging markets, has positioned it as a formidable competitor. Ford, despite its legacy and brand recognition, faces challenges in adapting to changing consumer demands, technological advancements, and the rise of new market players.

The main protagonists are Geely, led by its visionary CEO Li Shufu, and Ford, under the leadership of Jim Hackett. Geely's aggressive expansion strategy and focus on innovation are contrasted with Ford's struggle to adapt to the changing market dynamics.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

To analyze the situation, we employ a combination of frameworks:

1. Porter's Five Forces:

  • Threat of New Entrants: The automotive industry is characterized by high barriers to entry due to substantial capital investment and technological complexity. However, the rise of electric vehicles and autonomous driving technologies could potentially lower these barriers, increasing the threat of new entrants.
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers: Consumers have increasing bargaining power due to the availability of diverse options and online platforms that provide transparent price comparisons.
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers: The automotive industry relies on a complex supply chain with numerous suppliers. While this can create leverage for suppliers, Ford's large scale and established relationships provide some bargaining power.
  • Threat of Substitutes: The rise of ride-sharing services, public transportation, and alternative modes of transportation poses a significant threat to traditional car ownership.
  • Competitive Rivalry: The automotive industry is highly competitive, with established players like Toyota, Volkswagen, and Hyundai vying for market share. Geely's emergence further intensifies this rivalry.

2. SWOT Analysis:

Ford:

  • Strengths: Strong brand recognition, established global distribution network, extensive manufacturing capabilities, and a diverse product portfolio.
  • Weaknesses: Slow adaptation to technological advancements, declining market share in key regions, and a perception of lagging innovation.
  • Opportunities: Leveraging its existing infrastructure for electric vehicle production, expanding into emerging markets, and developing innovative mobility solutions.
  • Threats: Increasing competition from emerging market players like Geely, evolving consumer preferences towards electric vehicles and autonomous driving, and potential regulatory changes.

Geely:

  • Strengths: Rapid growth, strategic acquisitions, focus on innovation, and a strong presence in emerging markets.
  • Weaknesses: Limited brand recognition in developed markets, potential dependence on government support, and a need to enhance its global manufacturing capabilities.
  • Opportunities: Expanding into developed markets, leveraging its technological expertise in electric vehicles and autonomous driving, and building stronger brand recognition.
  • Threats: Potential economic instability in China, intense competition from established players, and challenges in navigating regulatory hurdles in different markets.

3. Value Chain Analysis:

Both Ford and Geely need to analyze their value chains to identify areas for improvement and optimization. This includes:

  • Inbound Logistics: Optimizing supply chain management, sourcing materials efficiently, and reducing transportation costs.
  • Operations: Improving manufacturing processes, adopting advanced technologies, and enhancing production efficiency.
  • Outbound Logistics: Streamlining distribution networks, expanding dealer networks, and ensuring timely delivery of vehicles.
  • Marketing and Sales: Developing targeted marketing campaigns, leveraging digital channels, and strengthening customer relationships.
  • Service: Providing excellent after-sales service, offering maintenance packages, and addressing customer complaints promptly.

4. Business Model Innovation:

Ford needs to explore new business models to stay competitive. This could include:

  • Subscription Services: Offering vehicle subscriptions instead of traditional ownership, providing flexibility and convenience to consumers.
  • Mobility Solutions: Expanding into ride-sharing, autonomous driving, and other mobility services, catering to the evolving needs of urban populations.
  • Data Analytics: Leveraging data analytics to personalize customer experiences, optimize operations, and develop new products and services.

5. Corporate Governance:

Ford needs to strengthen its corporate governance to ensure agility and responsiveness to changing market conditions. This includes:

  • Board Composition: Appointing directors with diverse expertise and experience in technology, innovation, and emerging markets.
  • Decision-Making Processes: Streamlining decision-making processes to enable faster responses to market opportunities and threats.
  • Risk Management: Developing robust risk management frameworks to mitigate potential challenges and seize emerging opportunities.

4. Recommendations

1. Embrace Digital Transformation:

  • Invest in Technology: Invest heavily in research and development, particularly in electric vehicles, autonomous driving, and connected car technologies.
  • Leverage Data Analytics: Utilize data analytics to personalize customer experiences, optimize operations, and develop new products and services.
  • Develop Digital Platforms: Create digital platforms for online sales, customer service, and data collection.
  • Embrace Mobility Solutions: Expand into ride-sharing, autonomous driving, and other mobility services, catering to the evolving needs of urban populations.

2. Redefine Core Competencies:

  • Focus on Innovation: Shift from a traditional manufacturing focus to a more innovation-driven approach, emphasizing technology, design, and customer experience.
  • Develop New Capabilities: Acquire or develop expertise in areas like software development, artificial intelligence, and data analytics.
  • Embrace Agile Development: Adopt agile development methodologies to accelerate product development and respond quickly to market changes.

3. Reposition the Brand:

  • Target New Customer Segments: Focus on attracting younger, tech-savvy consumers who value sustainability and innovation.
  • Highlight Sustainability: Promote its commitment to environmental sustainability and electric vehicle development.
  • Enhance Brand Image: Invest in marketing campaigns that showcase its technological advancements and innovative products.

4. Strategic Partnerships:

  • Collaborate with Tech Companies: Form strategic partnerships with technology companies to leverage their expertise in software, artificial intelligence, and data analytics.
  • Joint Ventures: Explore joint ventures with other automotive manufacturers or technology companies to develop new technologies and products.
  • Strategic Alliances: Form strategic alliances with ride-sharing companies, public transportation providers, and other mobility service providers to expand its reach and offer comprehensive solutions.

5. Global Expansion Strategy:

  • Focus on Emerging Markets: Expand its presence in emerging markets with high growth potential, particularly in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
  • Adapt Products and Services: Tailor its products and services to meet the specific needs of different markets.
  • Build Local Partnerships: Form partnerships with local companies to leverage their knowledge and expertise in navigating local regulations and consumer preferences.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a thorough analysis of Ford's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, as well as the changing dynamics of the automotive industry. They are aligned with Ford's core competencies and mission to provide innovative and sustainable transportation solutions. They also consider the needs of external customers, internal clients, and competitors, aiming to position Ford for long-term success in a rapidly evolving market.

6. Conclusion

Ford faces a significant challenge from emerging market players like Geely, but it also has the opportunity to leverage its legacy, brand recognition, and global reach to adapt and thrive in the new automotive landscape. By embracing digital transformation, redefining its core competencies, and repositioning its brand, Ford can regain its competitive edge and secure its future in a rapidly changing industry.

7. Discussion

Alternative options include:

  • Mergers and Acquisitions: Ford could consider acquiring or merging with a technology company to gain access to cutting-edge technology and expertise. However, this strategy carries significant risks and requires careful due diligence.
  • Outsourcing: Ford could outsource certain functions, such as manufacturing or software development, to reduce costs and focus on core competencies. However, this could lead to loss of control and potential quality issues.

Key assumptions include:

  • Continued Growth of Electric Vehicles: The recommendations assume that the demand for electric vehicles will continue to grow, creating a significant market opportunity for Ford.
  • Advancements in Autonomous Driving: The recommendations assume that autonomous driving technology will continue to develop and become commercially viable, opening up new avenues for Ford.
  • Changing Consumer Preferences: The recommendations assume that consumers will continue to prioritize technology, sustainability, and convenience in their transportation choices.

8. Next Steps

To implement these recommendations, Ford should:

  • Establish a Digital Transformation Task Force: Create a dedicated team to oversee the implementation of digital transformation initiatives.
  • Develop a Strategic Roadmap: Create a detailed roadmap outlining the key milestones, timelines, and resources required for each initiative.
  • Invest in Talent Development: Invest in training and development programs to equip employees with the skills necessary to succeed in the new automotive landscape.
  • Monitor Progress and Adapt: Continuously monitor progress, assess the effectiveness of initiatives, and make adjustments as needed.

By taking these steps, Ford can position itself for long-term success in a rapidly changing automotive industry, ensuring its continued relevance and competitiveness in the face of emerging market players like Geely.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In 2010, when China surpassed the United States to become the largest global market for automobiles, China's Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. (Geely) entered the global automobile industry by acquiring Volvo Group's cars division from Ford. Seven years later, Geely bought a controlling stake of 51 per cent in Lotus Cars, a stake in the truck maker AB Volvo, and a 10 per cent share of Daimler AG worth US$9 billion, becoming its largest shareholder. On August 31, 2018, Ford's chief executive officer faced a strategic challenge: assess the level of threat that Geely posed and how to respond to it, if necessary. Was Geely's rise in the market endangering Ford's market position?

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader

Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Geely Versus Ford: Threat from an Emerging Market Multinational to a Market Leader




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Stategy Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.