Free Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A) Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)

"Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)" Harvard business case study is written by David G. Fubini, Ethan S. Bernstein, Mark Saadine, Sarah McAra, James Barnett. It deals with the challenges in the field of Organizational Behavior. The case study is 31 page(s) long and it was first published on : Nov 3, 2017

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a comprehensive approach to Boston's 2024 Olympic bid, focusing on building a strong and sustainable foundation for the Games. This strategy involves addressing the key challenges identified in the case study, including public support, cost management, and legacy planning.

2. Background

The case study revolves around Boston's bid to host the 2024 Summer Olympics. The bid faced significant challenges, including public opposition, concerns about cost overruns, and a lack of clear vision for the Games' legacy. The case study highlights the complex interplay of organizational behavior, leadership styles, and public perception in the context of a major international event.

The main protagonists are:

  • The Boston 2024 Bid Committee: Led by a diverse group of executives, they are responsible for developing and executing the bid strategy.
  • The Public: A diverse group with varying opinions on the Olympics, ranging from enthusiastic supporters to staunch opponents.
  • Local Politicians: Key decision-makers who hold significant influence over the bid's success.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of several frameworks, including:

1. Stakeholder Analysis: The bid committee needs to understand the needs and concerns of various stakeholders, including the public, local businesses, government agencies, and international Olympic organizations. This involves identifying their interests, power, and potential impact on the bid.

2. SWOT Analysis: Analyzing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with the bid is crucial. This involves examining the city's infrastructure, potential for economic growth, and the potential risks of cost overruns and public opposition.

3. Change Management: The bid process itself requires significant organizational change, including building a strong team, managing public perception, and navigating complex political landscapes.

4. Leadership Styles: The success of the bid depends heavily on the leadership styles of the bid committee and the ability to inspire and motivate stakeholders.

5. Communication Strategies: Effective communication is essential for building public support, managing expectations, and addressing concerns. This involves tailoring communication strategies to different stakeholder groups.

4. Recommendations

1. Build a Strong Foundation of Public Support:

  • Engage the Public: Conduct extensive public outreach programs, including town hall meetings, online forums, and community events.
  • Address Concerns: Actively listen to and address public concerns about costs, infrastructure, and legacy planning.
  • Transparency and Accountability: Maintain transparency in all aspects of the bid process, including budget projections, infrastructure plans, and legacy initiatives.
  • Build a Cohesive Narrative: Develop a compelling narrative that highlights the benefits of hosting the Olympics, focusing on economic growth, community development, and the city's global image.

2. Manage Costs Effectively:

  • Realistic Budget Projections: Develop a detailed and realistic budget that accounts for all potential costs, including infrastructure upgrades, security, and operational expenses.
  • Private Sector Partnerships: Leverage private sector investment to offset public spending, exploring public-private partnerships for infrastructure projects and event sponsorship.
  • Cost-Effective Solutions: Explore innovative and cost-effective solutions for infrastructure projects, such as utilizing existing facilities and minimizing unnecessary construction.

3. Plan for a Sustainable Legacy:

  • Long-Term Vision: Develop a comprehensive plan for the Games' legacy, focusing on sustainable economic growth, community development, and improved infrastructure.
  • Post-Games Utilization: Ensure that Olympic venues have a clear and viable plan for post-Games utilization, minimizing the risk of 'white elephant' projects.
  • Social Impact: Prioritize social impact initiatives that benefit the community, such as youth sports programs, community centers, and environmental sustainability projects.

4. Foster Collaborative Leadership:

  • Cross-Functional Teams: Establish cross-functional teams that bring together experts from various sectors, including government, business, and community organizations.
  • Shared Decision-Making: Encourage shared decision-making processes that foster collaboration and consensus-building among stakeholders.
  • Effective Communication: Implement clear and consistent communication channels to ensure that all stakeholders are informed and engaged in the bid process.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core Competencies and Mission: The recommendations align with Boston's strengths in infrastructure, innovation, and community engagement, while also considering the city's long-term vision for sustainable development.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations address the needs and concerns of various stakeholders, including the public, local businesses, government agencies, and international Olympic organizations.
  • Competitors: The recommendations take into account the competitive landscape and the need for a compelling and unique bid that differentiates Boston from other potential host cities.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are based on a comprehensive assessment of the economic, social, and environmental benefits of hosting the Olympics, taking into account potential risks and mitigating strategies.

6. Conclusion

By adopting a comprehensive and collaborative approach, Boston can overcome the challenges and capitalize on the opportunities presented by the 2024 Olympic bid. By prioritizing public engagement, cost management, and legacy planning, Boston can create a successful and sustainable Games that benefits the city and its residents for years to come.

7. Discussion

Alternatives Not Selected:

  • Abandoning the bid: While this option would eliminate the risks associated with hosting the Games, it would also miss out on potential economic and social benefits.
  • Focusing solely on economic benefits: This approach could lead to a narrow focus on infrastructure development without addressing broader societal concerns and potential negative impacts.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Public Opinion: The success of the bid depends heavily on public support, which can be influenced by factors beyond the bid committee's control.
  • Cost Overruns: There is a risk of cost overruns, especially in the context of complex infrastructure projects and unforeseen circumstances.
  • Legacy Planning: The success of the legacy plan depends on effective implementation and collaboration among various stakeholders.

Options Grid:

OptionBenefitsRisks
Comprehensive ApproachStrong public support, cost-effective management, sustainable legacyPublic opinion shifts, cost overruns, implementation challenges
Abandoning the bidNo risks associated with hostingMissed opportunities for economic and social benefits
Focusing solely on economic benefitsPotential for economic growthNeglecting social and environmental concerns, potential negative impacts

8. Next Steps

Timeline:

  • Months 1-3: Conduct extensive public outreach programs, develop a detailed budget, and finalize the legacy plan.
  • Months 4-6: Secure private sector partnerships, negotiate with government agencies, and finalize infrastructure plans.
  • Months 7-9: Finalize the bid proposal, present the bid to the International Olympic Committee, and prepare for potential selection.
  • Months 10-12: If selected, begin implementing the Games plan, including infrastructure development, event planning, and public engagement initiatives.

Key Milestones:

  • Public support: Achieve a significant level of public support for the bid.
  • Budget approval: Secure approval for the bid budget from relevant stakeholders.
  • Legacy plan: Finalize and implement a comprehensive legacy plan.
  • IOC selection: Secure selection as the host city for the 2024 Summer Olympics.

Conclusion:

This case study highlights the complexities of hosting a major international event like the Olympics. By adopting a comprehensive and collaborative approach, Boston can overcome the challenges and capitalize on the opportunities presented by the 2024 Olympic bid. By prioritizing public engagement, cost management, and legacy planning, Boston can create a successful and sustainable Games that benefits the city and its residents for years to come.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

Two leadership groups from Boston 2024 negotiate with government bodies, community leaders, and olympic officials in an effort to bring the 2024 Olympics to Boston.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)

Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A) FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A) ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A) case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A). Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A) & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A) solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A) to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A) ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A) case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Winning (and Losing) the Olympics: Boston 2024 (A)




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.