Free Arup: Building the Water Cube Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Arup: Building the Water Cube

"Arup: Building the Water Cube" Harvard business case study is written by Robert G. Eccles, Amy C. Edmondson, Dilyana Karadzhova. It deals with the challenges in the field of Organizational Behavior. The case study is 21 page(s) long and it was first published on : Feb 18, 2010

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Arup adopt a strategic approach to project management that emphasizes collaboration, innovation, and cultural sensitivity. This will involve implementing a robust cross-functional team structure, fostering a culture of open communication and knowledge sharing, and developing a comprehensive talent management program. This approach will enable Arup to successfully deliver complex projects like the Water Cube while maintaining its reputation for excellence and fostering a positive and inclusive work environment.

2. Background

The case study focuses on Arup's involvement in the construction of the National Aquatics Center, nicknamed 'The Water Cube,' for the 2008 Beijing Olympics. The project presented numerous challenges, including tight deadlines, cultural differences, and complex engineering requirements. Arup, a global engineering and design firm, faced the task of collaborating with Chinese partners and navigating the unique cultural and political landscape of China. The case highlights the importance of effective communication, cross-cultural understanding, and strong leadership in achieving project success.

The main protagonists are:

  • Arup: A global engineering and design firm, responsible for the structural design and engineering of the Water Cube.
  • China Construction Corporation: The main contractor responsible for the construction of the Water Cube.
  • The Beijing Organizing Committee for the Games of the XXIX Olympiad (BOCOG): The organization responsible for planning and executing the 2008 Beijing Olympics.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study can be analyzed through the lens of several key management frameworks:

1. Organizational Behavior: Arup's success on the Water Cube project was heavily influenced by its ability to manage the diverse personalities and perspectives within its team and its collaboration with Chinese partners. This involved understanding individual motivations, fostering effective communication, and navigating potential conflicts.

2. Cross-functional Management: The Water Cube project required seamless collaboration between various disciplines, including structural engineering, architecture, and project management. Arup's success was a testament to its ability to effectively manage these cross-functional teams, ensuring open communication and a shared understanding of project goals.

3. Leadership: The case highlights the importance of strong leadership in navigating complex projects. Arup's leadership team demonstrated effective communication, cultural sensitivity, and the ability to inspire and motivate their team members.

4. Change Management: Arup faced significant challenges in managing the cultural differences and communication barriers between its team and Chinese partners. The case demonstrates the importance of effective change management strategies to adapt to new environments and build trust with stakeholders.

5. Organizational Culture: Arup's success can be attributed to its strong organizational culture, which emphasizes collaboration, innovation, and a commitment to excellence. This culture fostered a positive and supportive work environment, enabling the team to overcome challenges and achieve project goals.

4. Recommendations

To further enhance Arup's project management capabilities and ensure continued success in complex international projects, we recommend the following:

1. Implement a Robust Cross-functional Team Structure:

  • Create dedicated cross-functional teams for each major project, ensuring representation from all relevant disciplines.
  • Establish clear roles and responsibilities for each team member.
  • Facilitate regular communication and collaboration between team members.

2. Foster a Culture of Open Communication and Knowledge Sharing:

  • Encourage open dialogue and feedback within teams and across departments.
  • Implement knowledge management systems to capture and share project learnings.
  • Foster a culture of continuous learning and improvement.

3. Develop a Comprehensive Talent Management Program:

  • Invest in employee training and development programs that focus on cross-cultural communication, leadership, and project management skills.
  • Implement a performance management system that recognizes and rewards individual and team contributions.
  • Create a talent pipeline for future leaders, focusing on diversity and inclusion.

4. Embrace Technology and Analytics:

  • Leverage advanced project management software and tools to streamline processes, improve communication, and enhance decision-making.
  • Utilize data analytics to identify potential risks and opportunities, and to track project progress.

5. Emphasize Cultural Sensitivity and Inclusivity:

  • Integrate cultural sensitivity training into employee development programs.
  • Encourage cross-cultural collaboration and knowledge exchange.
  • Foster a diverse and inclusive work environment that values different perspectives and experiences.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations align with Arup's core competencies in engineering, design, and project management. They also support the firm's mission to deliver innovative and sustainable solutions for a better world.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations aim to improve Arup's ability to meet the needs of its external clients, such as BOCOG, and its internal clients, including project teams and stakeholders.
  • Competitors: The recommendations will help Arup stay ahead of its competitors by fostering a culture of innovation, promoting cross-cultural collaboration, and leveraging advanced technology.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are expected to enhance project efficiency, improve communication, and foster a more positive and inclusive work environment, ultimately leading to improved project outcomes and increased client satisfaction.

6. Conclusion

By adopting these recommendations, Arup can further enhance its project management capabilities, foster a more collaborative and innovative work environment, and strengthen its position as a leading global engineering and design firm. Arup's success on the Water Cube project demonstrates the importance of these principles, and by implementing them strategically, the firm can continue to achieve exceptional results on complex international projects.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Outsourcing project management: Arup could choose to outsource project management to specialized firms, however, this could lead to a loss of control and potentially compromise the quality of the project.
  • Adopting a more hierarchical organizational structure: This could lead to slower decision-making processes and a less collaborative work environment.

Risks:

  • Resistance to change: Employees may resist changes to the organizational structure or culture.
  • Lack of resources: Implementing these recommendations may require significant investment in training, technology, and other resources.
  • Cultural misunderstandings: Despite efforts to foster cultural sensitivity, misunderstandings may still occur.

Key Assumptions:

  • Arup's leadership team is committed to implementing these recommendations.
  • Employees are willing to embrace change and adapt to new ways of working.
  • Sufficient resources are available to support the implementation of these recommendations.

8. Next Steps

  • Develop a detailed implementation plan: This plan should outline specific actions, timelines, and responsibilities for each recommendation.
  • Communicate the changes to employees: Ensure that employees understand the rationale behind the changes and how they will benefit from them.
  • Pilot test the recommendations: Implement the recommendations on a pilot project before rolling them out company-wide.
  • Monitor progress and make adjustments: Regularly assess the effectiveness of the recommendations and make adjustments as needed.

By taking these steps, Arup can successfully implement the recommended changes and position itself for continued success in the global engineering and design market.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Arup: Building the Water Cube

Case Description

Arup, an engineering firm, collaborated with PTW Architects and China Construction Design Institute to develop a design for the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics Aquatics Center design competition. Their winning concept for the Water Cube combined elements of Chinese culture with innovative materials and sustainability requirements. The multidisciplinary and cross-company team, based in Sydney, Australia with counterparts in Beijing, faced project management challenges and cultural differences. The Water Cube became an iconic image during the Olympics and managers at Arup now wonder how to leverage the impact within the company.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Arup: Building the Water Cube

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Arup: Building the Water Cube

Arup: Building the Water Cube FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Arup: Building the Water Cube" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Arup: Building the Water Cube ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Arup: Building the Water Cube case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Arup: Building the Water Cube. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Arup: Building the Water Cube" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Arup: Building the Water Cube & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Arup: Building the Water Cube" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Arup: Building the Water Cube solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Arup: Building the Water Cube

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Arup: Building the Water Cube" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Arup: Building the Water Cube"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Arup: Building the Water Cube to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Arup: Building the Water Cube ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Arup: Building the Water Cube case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Arup: Building the Water Cube" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Arup: Building the Water Cube




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.