Free Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp

"Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp" Harvard business case study is written by James Shein, Evan Meagher. It deals with the challenges in the field of International Business. The case study is 12 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 20, 2017

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that ThyssenKrupp implement a comprehensive and multi-faceted strategy to rebuild trust, restore its reputation, and ensure long-term sustainability. This strategy should focus on strengthening governance, enhancing transparency, promoting ethical behavior, and fostering a culture of accountability throughout the organization. This includes a thorough review of its business practices, corporate culture, and leadership structure, with a particular emphasis on ethical decision-making and risk management.

2. Background

This case study explores the series of scandals that plagued ThyssenKrupp, a German multinational conglomerate, in the early 2000s. The company faced allegations of bribery, fraud, and corruption in various countries, particularly in emerging markets like China and Russia. These scandals resulted in significant financial losses, reputational damage, and legal repercussions.

The main protagonists in this case are:

  • Eberhard Rechtholz: The CEO of ThyssenKrupp at the time of the scandals. He was responsible for overseeing the company's operations and ultimately held accountability for the unethical practices that were uncovered.
  • ThyssenKrupp's Board of Directors: The board was responsible for setting the strategic direction of the company and overseeing its governance. They were criticized for their failure to effectively monitor and address the ethical concerns that were emerging.
  • The employees involved in the unethical practices: These individuals were responsible for carrying out the illegal activities, often under pressure from superiors or driven by personal gain.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study highlights a breakdown in ThyssenKrupp's corporate governance and ethical framework. Several key factors contributed to the scandals:

  • Aggressive growth strategy: ThyssenKrupp's pursuit of rapid expansion into emerging markets, particularly in sectors like steel and construction, led to a focus on short-term gains and a disregard for ethical considerations.
  • Weak internal controls: The company lacked robust internal controls and oversight mechanisms, allowing unethical practices to flourish. This was exacerbated by a culture of secrecy and a reluctance to report wrongdoing.
  • Lack of ethical leadership: The leadership team failed to establish a strong ethical culture and set the right tone from the top. This created a permissive environment where unethical behavior was tolerated or even encouraged.
  • Cross-cultural challenges: Operating in diverse and complex international markets presented challenges in navigating cultural norms and legal frameworks. This increased the risk of unethical practices, particularly in countries with weaker regulatory environments.

This analysis can be further explored through the lens of the following frameworks:

  • Porter's Five Forces: The case study demonstrates the competitive pressures faced by ThyssenKrupp, particularly in emerging markets. The company's aggressive growth strategy was driven by a desire to compete with other multinational corporations, leading to a focus on cost reduction and market share gains.
  • The Agency Theory: The scandals highlight the potential conflict of interest between the company's management and its shareholders. The pursuit of short-term gains by management, at the expense of long-term sustainability and ethical behavior, ultimately damaged shareholder value.
  • The Stakeholder Theory: The case study demonstrates the importance of considering the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the wider community. ThyssenKrupp's unethical practices negatively impacted these stakeholders, leading to reputational damage and a loss of trust.

4. Recommendations

To address the challenges faced by ThyssenKrupp, we recommend the following:

  • Strengthening Corporate Governance:
    • Implement a robust code of ethics and conduct, clearly outlining expectations for ethical behavior at all levels of the organization.
    • Establish an independent ethics committee to oversee ethical compliance and provide guidance to employees.
    • Enhance internal controls and risk management processes to prevent and detect unethical practices.
    • Implement a whistleblower program to encourage employees to report wrongdoing without fear of retaliation.
  • Promoting Ethical Culture:
    • Foster a culture of integrity and accountability throughout the organization.
    • Provide ethics training to all employees, emphasizing the importance of ethical decision-making and compliance with regulations.
    • Implement a system for monitoring and measuring ethical performance.
  • Rebuilding Trust:
    • Be transparent and accountable for past mistakes.
    • Communicate effectively with stakeholders, providing clear and accurate information about the company's actions and progress.
    • Engage with stakeholders to rebuild trust and demonstrate commitment to ethical behavior.
  • Strategic Review and Adaptation:
    • Conduct a thorough review of the company's business practices, particularly in emerging markets.
    • Develop a long-term strategy that prioritizes sustainable growth and ethical behavior.
    • Reassess the company's international expansion strategy, focusing on markets with strong regulatory frameworks and a commitment to ethical business practices.
  • Leadership and Accountability:
    • Appoint ethical and experienced leaders who are committed to upholding high standards of corporate governance.
    • Establish clear lines of accountability and responsibility for ethical conduct.
    • Hold senior executives accountable for any unethical behavior within their teams.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: ThyssenKrupp's core competencies lie in manufacturing and engineering. The recommendations aim to ensure that these competencies are deployed ethically and sustainably, aligning with the company's mission to create value for its stakeholders.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations prioritize rebuilding trust with external customers and internal clients by demonstrating a commitment to ethical behavior and transparency.
  • Competitors: The recommendations aim to position ThyssenKrupp as a leader in ethical business practices, differentiating the company from competitors and attracting customers and investors who value sustainability and integrity.
  • Attractiveness ' quantitative measures if applicable (e.g., NPV, ROI, break-even, payback): While the recommendations are primarily focused on qualitative improvements, they are expected to contribute to long-term financial performance by reducing reputational risk, improving stakeholder relationships, and attracting talent.
  • Assumptions: The recommendations assume that ThyssenKrupp is committed to implementing these changes and that its leadership team is willing to embrace a culture of ethical behavior and accountability.

6. Conclusion

The scandals at ThyssenKrupp serve as a stark reminder of the importance of strong corporate governance, ethical leadership, and a culture of integrity. By implementing the recommendations outlined above, ThyssenKrupp can rebuild trust, restore its reputation, and ensure long-term sustainability.

7. Discussion

Alternative options not selected include:

  • Ignoring the scandals and continuing business as usual: This would have been a short-sighted and risky approach, likely leading to further reputational damage and legal repercussions.
  • Focusing solely on legal compliance: While important, this would not address the underlying cultural and leadership issues that contributed to the scandals.

Key risks associated with the recommended approach include:

  • Resistance to change: Some employees and executives may resist the implementation of new ethical guidelines and procedures.
  • Insufficient commitment from leadership: The success of the recommendations depends on the commitment and support of the leadership team.
  • Unforeseen challenges: The global business environment is constantly evolving, and new ethical challenges may emerge.

8. Next Steps

The implementation of these recommendations should be a phased process, with clear milestones and timelines.

  • Phase 1 (Short-term):
    • Establish an independent ethics committee.
    • Conduct a comprehensive review of the company's business practices.
    • Implement a whistleblower program.
    • Provide ethics training to all employees.
  • Phase 2 (Medium-term):
    • Develop and implement a new code of ethics and conduct.
    • Strengthen internal controls and risk management processes.
    • Conduct a public apology and commit to transparency.
  • Phase 3 (Long-term):
    • Monitor and measure ethical performance.
    • Continuously improve and adapt ethical guidelines and procedures.
    • Foster a culture of ethical behavior and accountability.

By taking these steps, ThyssenKrupp can demonstrate its commitment to ethical business practices and rebuild trust with its stakeholders. This will be a long and challenging process, but it is essential for the company's long-term success.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR International Business case study - Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp

Case Description

On March 7, 2013, ThyssenKrupp Group CEO Heinrich Hiesinger was shocked to receive a resignation letter from Gerhard Cromme, chairman of the company's supervisory board. Hiesinger had been CEO since 2010. Early in his tenure, ThyssenKrupp incurred massive losses from disastrous steel investments and faced allegations of colluding with other companies to fix prices in its railway steel operations. As a result, Hiesinger had been forced to dismiss three executive board members, one for violating company policy. After a supervisory board member also was dismissed for violating company policy, the company's offices were raided in an investigation of price-fixing in steel contracts to the automotive industry. Cromme had been sharply criticized by shareholders and analysts as an impediment to the cultural, strategic, and governance changes Hiesinger was trying to make to address the scandals at ThyssenKrupp, but for months he defiantly had resisted calls for his removal. With no warning, he resigned without naming a successor or creating a plan to select one. Now that he no longer needed to deal with the distractions created by Cromme's presence, Hiesinger was free to finalize a plan to address the defects in ThyssenKrupp's governance.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR International Business case study - Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp

Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR International Business case study - Lie, Cheat, and Steel: Governance and Scandal at ThyssenKrupp




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.