Free Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98 Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98

"Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98" Harvard business case study is written by Philip Heymann. It deals with the challenges in the field of Human Resource Management. The case study is 29 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 25, 2004

This case study analyzes the complex negotiations between the tobacco industry and state attorneys general in 1997-98, highlighting the ethical and strategic challenges faced by both sides. We recommend a multi-pronged approach, focusing on corporate social responsibility, strategic planning, and change management to address the tobacco industry's negative impact on public health.

2. Background

The case study focuses on the landmark tobacco settlement of 1998, a pivotal moment in the history of public health and corporate accountability. The main protagonists are the tobacco industry, represented by the major cigarette manufacturers, and the state attorneys general, acting on behalf of their respective states. The case study explores the ethical dilemmas faced by both sides, the strategic maneuvering employed, and the long-term consequences of the settlement.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study can be analyzed through the lens of strategic management, corporate social responsibility, and organizational behavior.

  • Strategic Management: The tobacco industry's strategy was heavily reliant on marketing and product differentiation to attract and retain customers. However, this strategy was challenged by the growing public awareness of the health risks associated with smoking. The state attorneys general, on the other hand, adopted a strategic alliance approach, leveraging their collective bargaining power to negotiate a favorable settlement.
  • Corporate Social Responsibility: The tobacco industry's actions, including the deliberate targeting of young smokers and the concealment of scientific evidence, raised serious ethical concerns. The settlement represented a shift towards corporate accountability, forcing the industry to acknowledge its responsibility for the health consequences of its products.
  • Organizational Behavior: The case study highlights the importance of leadership and organizational culture in shaping corporate behavior. The tobacco industry's leadership, driven by profit maximization, failed to prioritize public health. The state attorneys general, motivated by a sense of public service, demonstrated strong leadership in holding the industry accountable.

4. Recommendations

  1. Embrace Corporate Social Responsibility: The tobacco industry must fundamentally shift its focus from profit maximization to corporate social responsibility. This involves prioritizing public health, actively promoting smoking cessation, and investing in research to develop safer alternatives.
  2. Strategic Planning for Sustainability: The tobacco industry needs to develop a long-term strategic plan that acknowledges the changing social and legal landscape. This plan should include strategies for reducing its reliance on traditional tobacco products, transitioning towards safer alternatives, and investing in research and development.
  3. Change Management for Organizational Transformation: The tobacco industry must undergo a significant organizational change, transforming its culture and values to prioritize public health. This requires strong leadership, effective communication, and a commitment to employee training and development.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core competencies and consistency with mission: The tobacco industry's core competency lies in its manufacturing and marketing expertise. However, these competencies need to be aligned with a new mission that prioritizes public health and sustainability.
  2. External customers and internal clients: The tobacco industry's external customers are smokers, while its internal clients are employees. The industry needs to shift its focus from attracting new smokers to supporting existing smokers in quitting and promoting safer alternatives.
  3. Competitors: The tobacco industry faces competition from emerging alternative products, such as e-cigarettes and vaping devices. The industry needs to adapt its strategy to compete effectively in this evolving market.
  4. Attractiveness ' quantitative measures: The industry's financial performance will be impacted by the shift towards safer alternatives and the decline in traditional tobacco product sales. However, the long-term benefits of prioritizing public health and sustainability outweigh the short-term financial costs.

6. Conclusion

The tobacco settlement of 1998 marked a turning point in the relationship between the tobacco industry and society. While the industry has made some progress in reducing its negative impact on public health, it still faces significant challenges. By embracing corporate social responsibility, developing a long-term strategic plan, and implementing effective change management strategies, the tobacco industry can transition towards a more sustainable and ethical future.

7. Discussion

Alternative approaches, such as government regulation or complete industry bans, could be considered. However, these options may have unintended consequences, such as black market activity and job losses. The recommendations presented in this case study offer a more pragmatic and achievable pathway towards a healthier future.

8. Next Steps

  1. Form a task force: The tobacco industry should establish a task force composed of senior executives, public health experts, and legal advisors to develop a comprehensive strategy for implementing the recommendations.
  2. Develop a communication plan: The industry should develop a clear and transparent communication plan to engage with stakeholders, including consumers, employees, investors, and policymakers.
  3. Invest in research and development: The industry should invest in research and development to develop safer alternatives to traditional tobacco products.
  4. Implement change management programs: The industry should implement change management programs to support employees in adapting to the new organizational culture and values.
  5. Monitor progress and make adjustments: The industry should regularly monitor progress towards achieving its goals and make necessary adjustments to its strategy.

By taking these steps, the tobacco industry can demonstrate its commitment to public health and sustainability, paving the way for a more responsible and ethical future.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98

Case Description

The decade of the 1990s was one of increasingly bitter public criticism of the major US tobacco companies on the part of a number of anti-tobacco advocacy groups, who were collectively known as the tobacco control movement. In their zeal to limit cigarette smoking, it was hardly uncommon for such groups to vilify tobacco companies on moral and ethical grounds. So it was no small surprise when, in the spring of 1997, Matthew Myers, executive vice-president of one of the nation's leading tobacco control groups, the National Center for Tobacco-Free Kids, was invited to sit down with representatives of the tobacco industry to discuss a grand compromise: billions in damages to be paid by the industry in exchange for protection from further legal liability due to the health effects of its products. This case, based on the book "Smoke in Their Eyes; Lessons in Movement Leadership from the Tobacco Wars" (Michael Pertschuk, Vanderbilt University Press, 2001), effectively tells the story of the historic behind-the-scenes tobacco settlement negotiations, which involved the attorneys general of several states, private attorneys, tobacco industry representatives, and Myers, as the lone representative of the tobacco control movement. The case, however, is not designed as a vehicle for discussion of tobacco issues per se (although it can serve that purpose) but, rather, for discussion of the dynamics of negotiations--in particular, the difficult but not uncommon position of Matthew Myers as one who, while attempting to forge a compromise, must also find ways not to lose the support of those in his movement who have more radical views. HKS Case Number 1737.0

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98

Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98 FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98 ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98 case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98 & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98 solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98 to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98 ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98 case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Dealing with the Devil: The Tobacco Control Negotiations of 1997-98




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.