Free The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013 Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013

"The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013" Harvard business case study is written by Rishabh Bhandari, Alexandre Martins, Yves Meyer, Sven A. Beiker, Robert A. Burgelman. It deals with the challenges in the field of General Management. The case study is 40 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jul 13, 2013

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a strategic shift for automotive manufacturers towards a hybrid model that leverages both internal development and strategic partnerships to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs). This strategy involves investing in core competencies like battery technology, forming strategic alliances with technology companies and infrastructure providers, and adapting marketing strategies to emphasize the environmental and economic benefits of EVs.

2. Background

The case study 'The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013' focuses on the nascent electric vehicle market and the challenges faced by traditional automotive manufacturers in transitioning to this new technology. The main protagonists are the major automakers like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota, who are grappling with the need to invest in EVs while maintaining their existing gasoline-powered vehicle market share. The case highlights the uncertainties surrounding consumer demand, government regulations, and the availability of charging infrastructure, all of which are critical to the success of EVs.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study presents a complex landscape with several key factors influencing the future of the electric automotive industry:

Strategic Analysis:

  • Porter's Five Forces: The industry is characterized by high bargaining power of buyers due to limited differentiation among EVs, moderate threat of new entrants due to high capital requirements, and moderate threat of substitutes with the continued presence of gasoline-powered vehicles.
  • SWOT Analysis: Traditional automakers possess strong strengths in manufacturing, brand recognition, and distribution networks. However, they face weaknesses in EV technology and lack of consumer awareness. Opportunities lie in the growing demand for sustainable transportation and government incentives. Threats include competition from new EV startups, technological disruptions, and consumer resistance to change.

Financial Analysis:

  • High upfront investment: Development and production of EVs require significant capital expenditure.
  • Uncertainty in return on investment: The market for EVs is still developing, making it difficult to predict long-term profitability.
  • Government incentives: Subsidies and tax breaks can offset initial costs and encourage consumer adoption.

Marketing Analysis:

  • Shifting consumer preferences: Growing awareness of environmental concerns and rising fuel prices are driving demand for EVs.
  • Limited consumer understanding: Many consumers are unfamiliar with EV technology and its benefits.
  • Building brand awareness: Marketing campaigns need to highlight the environmental and economic advantages of EVs.

Operations Analysis:

  • Supply chain challenges: Sourcing battery components and establishing charging infrastructure require new partnerships and logistics.
  • Manufacturing process adjustments: Production lines need to be adapted to accommodate the unique requirements of EV manufacturing.
  • Integration of technology: EVs require advanced software and electronics, necessitating collaboration with technology companies.

4. Recommendations

  1. Hybrid Model for EV Development: Automakers should adopt a hybrid approach, combining internal research and development with strategic partnerships. This allows them to leverage existing expertise while accessing cutting-edge technology from external partners.
  2. Strategic Alliances: Form strategic alliances with technology companies specializing in battery technology, software, and charging infrastructure. This provides access to specialized knowledge and accelerates the development process.
  3. Focus on Core Competencies: Invest in core competencies like battery technology and energy management systems. This ensures long-term competitiveness and reduces reliance on external partners.
  4. Marketing Strategies: Implement comprehensive marketing campaigns that emphasize the environmental and economic benefits of EVs. Target specific consumer segments and address concerns regarding range, charging time, and cost.
  5. Government Engagement: Actively engage with governments to advocate for policies that support EV adoption, such as subsidies, tax breaks, and charging infrastructure development.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: By focusing on core competencies like battery technology and leveraging strategic partnerships, automakers can maintain their competitive advantage while embracing innovation. This aligns with their mission to provide safe, reliable, and sustainable transportation solutions.
  2. External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations address the needs of both external customers seeking environmentally friendly vehicles and internal clients (employees) who need to adapt to new technologies and processes.
  3. Competitors: By adopting a hybrid model and forming strategic alliances, automakers can stay ahead of the competition and avoid being left behind in the rapidly evolving EV market.
  4. Attractiveness: The proposed strategy is financially attractive as it leverages government incentives and reduces upfront investment through partnerships. The long-term benefits of increased market share and brand loyalty outweigh the initial costs.

6. Conclusion

The electric automotive industry is poised for significant growth, presenting both challenges and opportunities for traditional automakers. By embracing a hybrid model, forming strategic alliances, and focusing on core competencies, these companies can successfully navigate the transition to EVs and secure a leading position in the future of mobility.

7. Discussion

  • Alternatives: Other alternatives include focusing solely on internal development, acquiring EV startups, or delaying entry into the EV market. However, these options carry higher risks and may not be as effective in achieving long-term success.
  • Risks: The main risks associated with the recommended strategy include technological disruptions, competition from new entrants, and consumer resistance to change.
  • Key Assumptions: The recommendations assume that government support for EVs will continue, consumer demand for EVs will grow, and technological advancements will continue to improve EV performance and affordability.

8. Next Steps

  • Short-term: Implement pilot programs to test and refine the hybrid model approach.
  • Mid-term: Establish strategic partnerships with technology companies and infrastructure providers.
  • Long-term: Develop a comprehensive roadmap for EV production and marketing, including investments in battery technology and charging infrastructure.

By taking these steps, automakers can position themselves for success in the rapidly evolving electric automotive industry, contributing to a cleaner and more sustainable future for transportation.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In the early 2010s, the shift towards electrified transportation remained an important trend as vehicle manufacturers were pursuing a variety of options to meet emission and fuel efficiency standards. This case provides a comprehensive update of the global electric vehicle industry, comprising vehicle manufacturers, battery suppliers, and charge providers. The situation of that industry in 2013 is assessed, which includes how the established manufacturers are reconsidering their strategies for vehicle powertrains, how newcomers are entering the market especially with electric vehicles and seem to become successful or fail. The case also summarizes governmental policies, incentives, and mandates in different regions, especially including the U.S., China, Japan, and Europe. In conclusion, more consolidation of the industry is expected, especially regarding the diversity of different electrification solutions and charge providers. While the operation range of electric vehicles is expected to remain a significant consumer concern, plug-in hybrid and range extended electric vehicles are seen as a viable solution to meet mobility and sustainability requirements. Therefore, the incumbent players seem to be relatively well positioned to provide respective products given their expertise regarding gasoline-powered vehicles and technology integration while the future of newcomers remains difficult to forecast.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013

The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013 FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013 ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013 case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013 & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013 solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013 to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013 ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013 case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - The Electric Automotive Industry in 2013



Most Read


Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.