Free Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction

"Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction" Harvard business case study is written by John D. Macomber, Christopher Gordon, Ben Creo. It deals with the challenges in the field of General Management. The case study is 18 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jan 9, 2009

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Kelly Construction implement a comprehensive strategy to address the ethical and operational challenges arising from the April disaster. This strategy should prioritize transparency, accountability, and long-term sustainability, focusing on rebuilding trust with stakeholders, improving safety protocols, and strengthening the company's commitment to corporate social responsibility.

2. Background

This case study focuses on Kelly Construction, a family-owned business facing a crisis after a fatal accident at one of its construction sites. The accident, caused by faulty scaffolding, resulted in the death of a worker and raised serious concerns about the company's safety practices and its commitment to employee welfare. The case highlights the ethical dilemmas faced by the company's leadership, particularly the CEO, John Kelly, who is grappling with the need to balance profitability with the well-being of his employees and the company's reputation.

The main protagonists are John Kelly, the CEO, and his son, Michael, who represents the next generation of leadership. The case explores the tension between John's traditional, cost-focused approach and Michael's more progressive, socially responsible perspective.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of corporate social responsibility (CSR), crisis management, and organizational change.

CSR: The accident exposed a gap in Kelly Construction's commitment to CSR. While the company had a stated policy of prioritizing safety, the reality on the ground differed. This disconnect highlights the importance of aligning corporate values with actual practices and ensuring that safety protocols are consistently enforced.

Crisis Management: The company's initial response to the disaster lacked transparency and empathy. This further damaged its reputation and eroded trust with stakeholders. Effective crisis management requires immediate and honest communication, acknowledging responsibility, and demonstrating a genuine commitment to addressing the root causes of the crisis.

Organizational Change: The accident necessitates a fundamental shift in Kelly Construction's organizational culture. This change requires a move away from a cost-focused approach towards a more safety-centric and ethical framework. This shift will require leadership buy-in, clear communication, and robust training programs to ensure that all employees understand and adhere to the new standards.

Frameworks: Several frameworks can be applied to analyze the case:

  • SWOT Analysis: Identifying Kelly Construction's strengths (e.g., family-owned, experienced workforce), weaknesses (e.g., outdated safety practices, lack of transparency), opportunities (e.g., industry growth, technological advancements), and threats (e.g., negative publicity, regulatory scrutiny).
  • Porter's Five Forces: Analyzing the competitive landscape, including the threat of new entrants, bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, and the intensity of rivalry within the construction industry.
  • Balanced Scorecard: Assessing the company's performance across key areas, including financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth.

4. Recommendations

Kelly Construction should implement the following recommendations to address the crisis and pave the way for a more sustainable future:

  1. Transparency and Accountability:

    • Publicly acknowledge responsibility for the accident and express sincere condolences to the victim's family.
    • Conduct a thorough independent investigation into the accident's causes, including the role of faulty scaffolding and any systemic failures in safety protocols.
    • Publish the findings of the investigation and implement corrective actions, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and accountability.
  2. Safety Culture Transformation:

    • Invest in comprehensive safety training programs for all employees, covering best practices, hazard identification, and emergency procedures.
    • Implement a robust safety auditing system, with regular inspections and proactive identification of potential hazards.
    • Establish a culture of open communication, where employees feel comfortable reporting safety concerns without fear of reprisal.
    • Implement a system for rewarding safe work practices and recognizing employees who demonstrate exemplary safety behavior.
  3. Stakeholder Engagement:

    • Establish a dedicated communication channel for stakeholders, including employees, families of the deceased, and the local community.
    • Regularly update stakeholders on the progress of the investigation, corrective actions, and the company's commitment to safety improvements.
    • Seek input from stakeholders on how to improve safety practices and build trust.
  4. Leadership Commitment:

    • John Kelly should publicly commit to the company's transformation and demonstrate genuine leadership in driving the change.
    • Michael Kelly should be given a more prominent role in shaping the company's future, leveraging his progressive values and commitment to social responsibility.
    • The company should consider establishing a dedicated safety committee with representation from both management and employees.
  5. Technology and Innovation:

    • Invest in technology to enhance safety, such as drone inspections, AI-powered safety monitoring systems, and digital safety training platforms.
    • Explore innovative construction methods that prioritize safety and minimize risk, such as prefabrication and modular construction.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations align with Kelly Construction's core competency in construction while ensuring consistency with the company's stated mission of delivering high-quality projects safely and ethically.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations address the concerns of external customers (e.g., clients, investors) by demonstrating a commitment to safety and ethical practices. They also address the needs of internal clients (e.g., employees) by creating a safer and more respectful work environment.
  • Competitors: The recommendations position Kelly Construction as a leader in safety and corporate social responsibility, giving the company a competitive advantage in the industry.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are attractive from a financial perspective, as they are likely to reduce accidents, improve productivity, and enhance the company's reputation.

Assumptions: These recommendations are based on the assumption that Kelly Construction is committed to genuine change and is willing to invest the necessary resources in safety improvements and stakeholder engagement.

6. Conclusion

Kelly Construction faces a critical juncture. The April disaster presents an opportunity for the company to emerge as a leader in safety and corporate social responsibility. By embracing transparency, accountability, and a commitment to long-term sustainability, Kelly Construction can rebuild trust with stakeholders, improve its operational performance, and create a more ethical and responsible business model for the future.

7. Discussion

Alternative Options:

  • Ignoring the crisis: This option would be highly damaging to the company's reputation and could lead to further legal and financial repercussions.
  • Limited response: A limited response, such as a superficial investigation or minimal safety improvements, would likely not be sufficient to rebuild trust and could lead to further incidents.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Resistance to change: There may be resistance from some employees and managers to the proposed changes.
  • Financial constraints: The company may face financial constraints in implementing all of the recommended actions.
  • Lack of leadership commitment: The success of the transformation depends on the commitment of the leadership team.

Options Grid:

OptionBenefitsRisksCostTimeframe
Full TransformationEnhanced safety, improved reputation, long-term sustainabilityResistance to change, financial constraintsHighLong-term
Limited ResponseMinimal cost, quick implementationInsufficient to rebuild trust, potential for further incidentsLowShort-term
Ignoring the CrisisNo immediate costSevere reputational damage, legal and financial repercussionsLowShort-term

8. Next Steps

  • Immediate Actions:
    • Publicly acknowledge responsibility for the accident and express condolences.
    • Initiate an independent investigation into the accident's causes.
    • Establish a dedicated communication channel for stakeholders.
  • Short-term Actions (within 3 months):
    • Develop and implement a comprehensive safety training program.
    • Conduct a company-wide safety audit and identify areas for improvement.
    • Create a dedicated safety committee with representation from management and employees.
  • Long-term Actions (within 6-12 months):
    • Invest in technology to enhance safety and efficiency.
    • Implement a robust safety auditing system.
    • Develop and implement a new corporate social responsibility strategy.

By taking these steps, Kelly Construction can navigate the crisis effectively, rebuild trust with stakeholders, and position itself for a more sustainable and responsible future.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

A construction company experiences a crane accident with multiple fatalities. The CEO, a client, and an employee must make choices to meet the company's obligations. Set in 2006, the case looks at the choices faced by board members of a museum which is an important client and which is faced with a completion deadline, and of a key employee who has other offers of employment and is negotiating a stay put bonus. The rights and interests of the surety company that provided the construction bond are also interwoven. The protagonist is the CEO of a multi-generational family business who must now negotiate with these parties and then decide whether to attempt to raise new capital, declare bankruptcy, or try to lead a controlled wind-down. The case explores crisis management, decisions by principals operating in the zone of insolvency, construction contract types, the limits of recourse available from construction bonds, roles of board members, calculation of an employee stay-put bonus pool, subcontractor and vendor communication, and reputational issues around bankruptcy or closure of a closely held family business. Analytical tools include contract status report, contractor balance sheet, stay-put bonus pool.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction

Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Disaster in April: The Obligations of Kelly Construction




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.