Free 24M Technologies Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - 24M Technologies

"24M Technologies" Harvard business case study is written by John R. Wells, Benjamin Weinstock. It deals with the challenges in the field of General Management. The case study is 10 page(s) long and it was first published on : Aug 25, 2020

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that 24M Technologies prioritize a strategic shift towards a hybrid business model, leveraging its core strengths in technology and analytics while embracing strategic partnerships and outsourcing for specific operational functions. This approach will enable 24M to accelerate its growth trajectory, mitigate financial risks, and enhance its competitive advantage in the rapidly evolving battery market.

2. Background

24M Technologies is a promising startup developing a revolutionary, low-cost, and scalable lithium-ion battery technology. The company faces significant challenges in scaling its operations, securing funding, and navigating a competitive market landscape. The case study focuses on the decision-making process of the company's leadership team, particularly CEO Reza Rad, as they grapple with these challenges and seek to establish a sustainable growth strategy.

The main protagonists are:

  • Reza Rad: CEO of 24M Technologies, responsible for overall strategic direction and decision-making.
  • David Vieau: Chief Operating Officer (COO), responsible for overseeing manufacturing and operations.
  • Michael Zimmerman: Chief Technology Officer (CTO), responsible for R&D and product development.
  • Board of Directors: Provides guidance and oversight to the company's leadership.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of several frameworks, including:

1. SWOT Analysis:

  • Strengths: Innovative battery technology, strong R&D team, potential for significant market disruption, experienced leadership.
  • Weaknesses: Limited manufacturing capacity, reliance on external funding, lack of established brand recognition, potential for technology obsolescence.
  • Opportunities: Growing demand for electric vehicles and energy storage, potential for partnerships with established players, expansion into new markets.
  • Threats: Competition from established battery manufacturers, fluctuating raw material prices, technological advancements by rivals, regulatory uncertainty.

2. Porter's Five Forces:

  • Threat of New Entrants: High, due to the relatively low barriers to entry in the battery manufacturing industry.
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers: Moderate, as buyers (e.g., automotive manufacturers) have multiple options for battery suppliers.
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Moderate, as raw material prices are subject to fluctuations and potential supply chain disruptions.
  • Threat of Substitutes: High, as alternative energy storage technologies are emerging.
  • Rivalry Among Existing Competitors: High, due to the presence of established players with significant resources and market share.

3. Financial Analysis:

  • 24M faces significant financial challenges, including high capital expenditures, limited revenue streams, and dependence on external funding.
  • The company needs to develop a clear and compelling financial model that demonstrates its long-term viability and potential for profitability.

4. Organizational Structure and Culture:

  • 24M's organizational structure is relatively flat, with a strong emphasis on collaboration and innovation.
  • The company culture is characterized by a high level of technical expertise and a passion for driving technological advancements.

5. Leadership Styles:

  • Reza Rad's leadership style is characterized by a strong vision, a focus on innovation, and a willingness to take calculated risks.
  • However, he needs to balance this with a more strategic and collaborative approach to decision-making, involving key stakeholders and fostering a culture of open communication.

4. Recommendations

1. Hybrid Business Model:

  • 24M should adopt a hybrid business model that combines internal manufacturing with strategic partnerships and outsourcing.
  • Internal Manufacturing: Focus on core competencies, such as technology development and specialized manufacturing processes.
  • Strategic Partnerships: Collaborate with established players in the battery industry to leverage their manufacturing capacity, distribution networks, and brand recognition.
  • Outsourcing: Outsource non-core functions, such as logistics, marketing, and customer service, to specialized providers.

2. Strategic Partnerships:

  • 24M should actively seek strategic partnerships with automotive manufacturers, energy storage companies, and other industry leaders.
  • These partnerships should be mutually beneficial, providing access to capital, manufacturing capacity, and distribution channels.

3. Funding Strategy:

  • 24M should diversify its funding sources, exploring options beyond traditional venture capital, such as government grants, strategic investments, and debt financing.
  • The company should develop a compelling pitch that highlights its unique technology, market potential, and potential for significant returns.

4. Manufacturing Strategy:

  • 24M should adopt a flexible and scalable manufacturing approach, utilizing modular production lines that can be easily expanded or adapted to meet changing demand.
  • The company should prioritize automation and lean manufacturing principles to optimize efficiency and reduce costs.

5. Marketing and Brand Building:

  • 24M should invest in building a strong brand identity that communicates its technological innovation, environmental sustainability, and commitment to customer satisfaction.
  • The company should leverage digital marketing channels, public relations, and industry events to raise awareness and build credibility.

6. Talent Management:

  • 24M should prioritize attracting and retaining top talent in engineering, manufacturing, and business development.
  • The company should offer competitive compensation and benefits packages, provide opportunities for professional development, and foster a culture of innovation and collaboration.

7. Corporate Social Responsibility:

  • 24M should integrate corporate social responsibility into its business practices, focusing on environmental sustainability, ethical sourcing, and community engagement.
  • The company should communicate its commitment to social responsibility through its marketing and branding efforts.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a thorough analysis of 24M's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, as well as an understanding of the competitive landscape and market trends.

1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The hybrid business model leverages 24M's core competencies in technology and analytics while addressing its limitations in manufacturing capacity and financial resources. It aligns with the company's mission to develop and commercialize innovative battery technologies.

2. External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations prioritize customer needs by providing access to high-quality, affordable batteries while ensuring a sustainable supply chain. They also foster a collaborative and supportive environment for internal clients, empowering employees to contribute to the company's success.

3. Competitors: By adopting a hybrid business model and forging strategic partnerships, 24M can effectively compete with established players and emerging startups in the battery market.

4. Attractiveness: The recommendations are expected to improve 24M's financial performance by reducing costs, increasing revenue, and enhancing its market position.

5. Assumptions: The recommendations are based on the assumption that the battery market will continue to grow, that 24M's technology will remain competitive, and that the company will be able to secure the necessary funding and partnerships.

6. Conclusion

24M Technologies has the potential to become a major player in the rapidly growing battery market. By adopting a hybrid business model, forging strategic partnerships, and prioritizing talent management and corporate social responsibility, the company can overcome its current challenges and achieve sustainable growth.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Full-scale internal manufacturing: This option would require significant capital investment and could lead to financial strain.
  • Outsourced manufacturing: This option could result in a loss of control over production processes and potentially compromise intellectual property.

Risks:

  • Partnership failure: Strategic partnerships may not be successful, leading to financial losses and reputational damage.
  • Technology obsolescence: 24M's technology may become outdated due to rapid advancements in the battery industry.
  • Regulatory uncertainty: Changes in regulations could impact the company's operations and profitability.

Key Assumptions:

  • The battery market will continue to grow at a significant rate.
  • 24M's technology will remain competitive and will meet market demands.
  • The company will be able to secure the necessary funding and partnerships.

8. Next Steps

Timeline:

  • Year 1: Develop a detailed business plan outlining the hybrid business model, identify potential partners, and secure initial funding.
  • Year 2: Establish strategic partnerships, initiate pilot production runs, and launch marketing campaigns.
  • Year 3: Expand manufacturing capacity, secure additional funding, and expand into new markets.

Key Milestones:

  • Secure strategic partnerships with key industry players.
  • Achieve profitability and positive cash flow.
  • Establish a strong brand identity and market presence.

By implementing these recommendations, 24M Technologies can position itself for success in the dynamic and competitive battery market.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - 24M Technologies

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In early 2020, 24M Technologies (24M) announced that two of its strategic investors had commenced building plants to produce lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries based on 24M's novel semi-solid electrode technology. This promised to halve the cost of conventional Li-ion batteries, increase the energy density to provide greater range in electric vehicles, and make them safer and more reliable. Cofounders Yet-Ming Chiang and Throop Wilder had set up the company 10 years earlier in a quest to take all that was good about Li-ion technology and improve it. The founders argued that, historically, Li-ion development had focused on miniaturized cells for consumer electronics and that these design principles had been carried over into cells destined for electric cars and grid-scale batteries. It made no sense to accept these constraints. What was needed was a fresh start; to begin with a "clean sheet of paper." The technology had taken 10 years and nearly $100 million to develop from a laboratory demonstration to a commercial product. Now, the challenge was to scale it up to compete with conventional technology.

πŸŽ“ Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! πŸŒŸπŸ“š #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - 24M Technologies

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - 24M Technologies

24M Technologies FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "24M Technologies" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " 24M Technologies ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The 24M Technologies case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for 24M Technologies. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "24M Technologies" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for 24M Technologies & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "24M Technologies" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my 24M Technologies solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

πŸŽ“ Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! πŸŒŸπŸ“š #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - 24M Technologies

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "24M Technologies" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "24M Technologies"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study 24M Technologies to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for 24M Technologies ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the 24M Technologies case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "24M Technologies" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - 24M Technologies




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.