Free Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy

"Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy" Harvard business case study is written by Jana Seijts, Paul Bigus. It deals with the challenges in the field of General Management. The case study is 8 page(s) long and it was first published on : Oct 17, 2011

At Fern Fort University, we recommend the Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) embark on a comprehensive strategic overhaul to address the fundraising controversy and restore public trust. This involves a multi-pronged approach encompassing organizational change, enhanced transparency, and a renewed focus on stakeholder engagement.

2. Background

The case study centers around the Canadian Cancer Society's (CCS) fundraising practices, specifically the allocation of funds and the perceived lack of transparency. The controversy erupted when a whistleblower revealed that a significant portion of donations was not directly used for cancer research and patient support, leading to public backlash and a decline in donations. This situation highlights the critical need for the CCS to rebuild trust with donors and the public.

The main protagonists in this case are:

  • The Canadian Cancer Society (CCS): A non-profit organization dedicated to fighting cancer through research, prevention, and support programs.
  • The Whistleblower: An individual who exposed the CCS's fundraising practices, triggering the controversy.
  • Donors and the Public: The primary stakeholders affected by the controversy, who rely on the CCS to effectively utilize their donations.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study can be analyzed using the following frameworks:

  • Stakeholder Analysis: This framework helps identify the various stakeholders affected by the controversy and their respective interests. The key stakeholders include donors, patients, research institutions, employees, and the public.
  • SWOT Analysis: This framework helps evaluate the CCS's internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats.
    • Strengths: Strong brand recognition, established network of volunteers, extensive experience in fundraising.
    • Weaknesses: Lack of transparency, potential for public distrust, inefficient allocation of resources.
    • Opportunities: Increased awareness of cancer research, potential for new fundraising initiatives, collaboration with other organizations.
    • Threats: Negative media coverage, decline in donations, competition from other charities.
  • Porter's Five Forces: This framework helps understand the competitive landscape for the CCS.
    • Threat of New Entrants: Moderate, as new charities can emerge.
    • Bargaining Power of Buyers (Donors): High, as donors have many options for charitable giving.
    • Threat of Substitutes: Moderate, as other organizations may offer similar services.
    • Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Low, as the CCS relies on a diverse range of suppliers.
    • Competitive Rivalry: High, as the CCS competes with numerous other charities.

4. Recommendations

To address the fundraising controversy and restore public trust, the CCS should implement the following recommendations:

1. Enhance Transparency and Accountability:

  • Publish a detailed annual report: This report should clearly outline the allocation of funds, including the percentage spent on research, patient support, and administrative costs.
  • Implement an independent audit: An external audit will provide assurance to donors that funds are being used effectively and ethically.
  • Establish a transparent grievance process: This process should allow donors and stakeholders to voice concerns and receive prompt and fair resolutions.

2. Redefine Fundraising Strategy:

  • Shift focus from fundraising to impact: Emphasize the tangible outcomes of the CCS's work, such as lives saved, research breakthroughs, and improved quality of life for cancer patients.
  • Develop innovative fundraising initiatives: Explore new avenues for fundraising, such as online platforms, social media campaigns, and corporate partnerships.
  • Engage with donors and stakeholders: Conduct regular surveys and focus groups to understand donor needs and preferences.

3. Implement Organizational Change:

  • Strengthen leadership: Appoint a CEO with a proven track record in ethical leadership and transparency.
  • Review and revise organizational structure: Streamline operations and ensure efficient allocation of resources.
  • Develop a robust ethics program: This program should provide clear guidelines for employees on ethical behavior and conflict of interest management.

4. Leverage Technology and Data Analytics:

  • Implement a comprehensive data management system: This system will help track fundraising efforts, donor engagement, and program outcomes.
  • Utilize AI and machine learning: Analyze data to identify trends, optimize resource allocation, and personalize donor communications.

5. Foster a Culture of Transparency and Accountability:

  • Promote open communication: Encourage employees to openly discuss concerns and ideas.
  • Reward ethical behavior: Recognize and reward employees who demonstrate integrity and commitment to transparency.
  • Develop a strong internal communication strategy: Ensure that all employees are informed about the CCS's mission, values, and fundraising practices.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations align with the CCS's mission to fight cancer and support patients.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations address the concerns of donors, patients, and employees.
  • Competitors: The recommendations aim to enhance the CCS's competitive advantage by improving transparency and effectiveness.
  • Attractiveness ' quantitative measures if applicable: The recommendations are expected to improve donor trust, increase donations, and ultimately lead to greater impact in the fight against cancer.
  • Assumptions: The recommendations assume that the CCS has the resources and commitment to implement the necessary changes.

6. Conclusion

The Canadian Cancer Society faces a critical juncture in its history. By embracing transparency, accountability, and innovation, the CCS can rebuild trust with donors and the public, reaffirm its commitment to fighting cancer, and continue to make a meaningful difference in the lives of those affected by this devastating disease.

7. Discussion

Alternative approaches to address the fundraising controversy include:

  • Ignoring the controversy: This option would be highly risky and could lead to further damage to the CCS's reputation.
  • Issuing a public apology without significant change: This option would be perceived as insincere and could further erode public trust.

The recommendations presented in this case study solution are based on the assumption that the CCS is committed to regaining public trust and improving its fundraising practices. If the CCS is unwilling or unable to implement these changes, it may face significant challenges in the future.

8. Next Steps

The CCS should immediately implement the following steps:

  • Form a task force: This task force should be composed of senior executives, board members, and external experts to oversee the implementation of the recommendations.
  • Develop a detailed implementation plan: This plan should outline the specific actions, timelines, and resources required for each recommendation.
  • Communicate with stakeholders: The CCS should proactively communicate with donors, patients, and the public about the changes being made.
  • Monitor progress and measure impact: The CCS should track the progress of implementation and measure the impact of the changes on donor trust, fundraising, and program outcomes.

By taking these steps, the CCS can demonstrate its commitment to transparency, accountability, and effectiveness, paving the way for a brighter future in the fight against cancer.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

On Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, the communication director, for the Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), in Toronto, Ontario, was faced with a challenging situation. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) had just released an online article that focused on the 2011 CCS budget, more specifically how the CCS allocated millions of dollars each year. Furthermore, the CBC article provided details on how the proportion of donation money the CCS spent on cancer research each year had decreased from 40 per cent in 2000 to under 22 per cent in 2011. With the CBC report circulating in both television and online media, public speculation into CCS's financial management of public donations was starting to grow. It was clear that the CCS communication team would need to respond. A communication strategy would need to be developed for the CCS to follow moving forward, along with a press release to be posted the next day on the CCS website.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy

Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Canadian Cancer Society: Fundraising Controversy



Most Read


Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.