Free Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A) Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)

"Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)" Harvard business case study is written by Paul M. Healy, Clayton Rose, Aldo Sesia. It deals with the challenges in the field of General Management. The case study is 23 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jan 27, 2010

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Chesapeake Energy implement a comprehensive reform of its incentive compensation structure, focusing on long-term value creation, ethical behavior, and sustainable growth. This reform should include a shift from a purely production-based incentive system to one that aligns with the company's overall strategic goals, incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors.

2. Background

This case study focuses on Chesapeake Energy, a leading natural gas producer in the United States, and its CEO Aubrey McClendon's controversial special incentive compensation program. The program incentivized employees, particularly McClendon himself, to acquire and develop natural gas reserves, leading to rapid growth and impressive financial performance for the company. However, this aggressive growth strategy also resulted in significant debt accumulation, questionable accounting practices, and ethical concerns.

The main protagonists in this case are Aubrey McClendon, CEO of Chesapeake Energy, and the company's board of directors, who were responsible for approving and overseeing the incentive compensation program.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of several frameworks:

Strategic Framework:

  • Growth Strategy: Chesapeake Energy's aggressive growth strategy, fueled by the incentive compensation program, initially led to significant market share gains. However, this rapid expansion came at the cost of financial stability and long-term sustainability.
  • Competitive Advantage: The incentive program initially created a competitive advantage for Chesapeake by attracting top talent and driving aggressive exploration. However, this advantage became unsustainable as the company's debt burden grew and its ethical practices came under scrutiny.
  • SWOT Analysis: The incentive program was a strength in the early years, driving growth and market share. However, it also created weaknesses, such as high debt levels and ethical concerns, which eventually became major threats to the company's long-term viability.

Financial Framework:

  • Financial Performance: The incentive program led to impressive short-term financial performance, but it also contributed to a significant increase in debt and a decline in profitability in the long run.
  • Risk Management: The program's focus on short-term production targets created significant financial risks for Chesapeake, as it neglected long-term sustainability and environmental considerations.

Ethical Framework:

  • Corporate Governance: The board of directors' oversight of the incentive program was inadequate, leading to a lack of accountability and ethical lapses.
  • Business Ethics: The incentive program encouraged a culture of short-term gains at the expense of long-term sustainability and ethical practices.

Organizational Behavior Framework:

  • Organizational Culture: The incentive program fostered a culture of aggressive growth and short-term thinking, which ultimately undermined the company's long-term success.
  • Leadership Styles: Aubrey McClendon's leadership style, characterized by a focus on aggressive growth and a disregard for ethical considerations, contributed to the company's downfall.

4. Recommendations

  1. Reform Incentive Compensation Structure: Chesapeake should implement a new incentive compensation structure that aligns with long-term value creation, ethical behavior, and sustainable growth. This should include:

    • Shifting focus from production to a balanced scorecard: Include metrics that measure profitability, environmental impact, social responsibility, and long-term shareholder value.
    • Introducing performance-based bonuses: Reward employees for achieving strategic goals, not just production targets.
    • Implementing clawback provisions: Allow the company to reclaim bonuses if performance targets are not met or if unethical behavior is discovered.
    • Enhancing transparency and accountability: Establish clear guidelines for incentive compensation and ensure that the board of directors has adequate oversight.
  2. Strengthen Corporate Governance: Chesapeake should strengthen its corporate governance practices to ensure ethical decision-making and accountability. This includes:

    • Independent Board Members: Appoint a majority of independent board members with expertise in environmental sustainability, financial management, and ethical business practices.
    • Enhanced Oversight: Establish a robust audit committee and a dedicated committee to oversee environmental and social responsibility initiatives.
    • Clear Code of Conduct: Develop and enforce a clear code of conduct that emphasizes ethical behavior and sustainable practices.
  3. Embracing Sustainability: Chesapeake should prioritize environmental sustainability and social responsibility in its operations. This includes:

    • Investing in Renewable Energy: Explore opportunities to diversify into renewable energy sources to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
    • Implementing Sustainable Practices: Adopt best practices for environmental protection, waste management, and water conservation.
    • Engaging with Stakeholders: Actively engage with local communities, environmental groups, and other stakeholders to address concerns and build trust.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The reformed incentive compensation structure aligns with Chesapeake's mission of providing energy solutions while prioritizing long-term value creation and sustainability.
  2. External Customers and Internal Clients: The new structure incentivizes employees to focus on customer satisfaction, environmental responsibility, and long-term value creation, which are important for both external customers and internal stakeholders.
  3. Competitors: By embracing sustainability and ethical practices, Chesapeake can differentiate itself from competitors and attract investors who value ESG factors.
  4. Attractiveness ' Quantitative Measures: The reformed incentive structure, combined with a focus on sustainability, can lead to improved financial performance, reduced risk, and increased investor confidence, ultimately leading to higher shareholder value.

6. Conclusion

Chesapeake Energy's aggressive growth strategy, fueled by a flawed incentive compensation program, ultimately led to unsustainable practices and ethical concerns. To regain investor confidence and ensure long-term success, the company must implement a comprehensive reform of its incentive structure, strengthen its corporate governance, and prioritize sustainability. This transformation will require a shift in organizational culture, leadership style, and decision-making processes.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Maintaining the existing incentive structure: This option is highly risky and could lead to further ethical lapses and financial instability.
  • Implementing a purely performance-based incentive structure: This could lead to a focus on short-term gains at the expense of long-term sustainability and ethical behavior.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Implementation Challenges: Implementing a new incentive structure and strengthening corporate governance can be complex and require significant change management efforts.
  • Employee Resistance: Some employees may resist the changes, particularly those who benefited from the previous incentive structure.
  • Market Volatility: The energy sector is subject to significant market volatility, which could impact the company's ability to achieve its strategic goals.

8. Next Steps

  1. Form a Task Force: Establish a task force comprising senior management, board members, and independent experts to develop a comprehensive reform plan.
  2. Conduct a Stakeholder Analysis: Identify and engage with key stakeholders to understand their concerns and gather feedback on the proposed changes.
  3. Pilot Test the New Incentive Structure: Implement a pilot program to test the effectiveness of the new incentive structure before rolling it out company-wide.
  4. Communicate the Changes Clearly: Communicate the rationale for the changes and the expected benefits to all employees and stakeholders.
  5. Monitor Progress and Make Adjustments: Regularly monitor the effectiveness of the new incentive structure and make adjustments as needed.

By taking these steps, Chesapeake Energy can create a more sustainable and ethical business model that will benefit both its employees and its stakeholders in the long run.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

Aubrey McClendon, founder and CEO of Chesapeake Energy, was, according to Fortune Magazine, the highest paid U.S. CEO in 2008 receiving over $100 million in total compensation. McClendon received this compensation despite a significant drop in the company's stock price and financial performance during the year. The (A) case addresses the specifics of the compensation and the rationale for the compensation from the perspective of Chesapeake's board and its compensation committee including McClendon's role in consummating several joint ventures, which the board and committee believed positioned the company for future growth in the relatively young industry of unconventional natural gas exploration and extraction. In addition, the (A) case describes the role of the compensation committee and the company's executive performance measurement factors.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)

Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A) FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A) ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A) case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A). Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A) & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A) solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A) to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A) ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A) case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy (A)



Most Read


Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.