Free The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018 Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018

"The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018" Harvard business case study is written by Michael Moffett, Jonas Gamso. It deals with the challenges in the field of Finance. The case study is 14 page(s) long and it was first published on : Nov 1, 2018

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) implement a phased approach to solar photovoltaic (PV) tariff adjustments, focusing on a combination of market-driven mechanisms and strategic government interventions. This approach aims to balance the need for a competitive and sustainable solar energy sector with the goal of achieving India's ambitious renewable energy targets.

2. Background

The case study focuses on the challenges faced by the MNRE in setting the solar PV tariff for 2018. India has ambitious renewable energy targets, aiming to achieve 175 GW of renewable energy capacity by 2022. The solar PV sector has witnessed rapid growth, driven by government incentives and falling global prices. However, the 2018 tariff setting process was complicated by several factors, including:

  • Declining global solar PV module prices: This led to intense competition among developers, resulting in aggressive bidding and low tariffs.
  • Financial stress in the sector: Some developers faced financial difficulties due to low tariffs and delays in project implementation.
  • Uncertainty about future policy: The MNRE was considering changes to the tariff setting mechanism, creating uncertainty for developers.

The key protagonists in the case study are the MNRE and the solar PV developers. The MNRE is responsible for setting the solar PV tariff, while the developers are responsible for building and operating solar PV projects.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study can be analyzed using a framework that considers both financial and strategic aspects of the solar PV sector:

Financial Analysis:

  • Capital Budgeting: The case highlights the importance of accurate capital budgeting for solar PV projects, considering factors like the cost of capital, project lifespan, and expected returns.
  • Risk Assessment: The declining global module prices and financial stress in the sector highlight the need for robust risk assessment, including financial modeling and sensitivity analysis.
  • Return on Investment (ROI): The MNRE needs to ensure that the tariffs set are sufficient to attract investors and provide an adequate ROI, considering the risks involved.
  • Cash Flow Management: Project delays and financial uncertainties emphasize the importance of effective cash flow management for developers.
  • Financial Forecasting: The MNRE needs to develop accurate financial forecasts for the solar PV sector to ensure that the set tariffs are sustainable over the long term.

Strategic Analysis:

  • Government Policy and Regulation: The MNRE's role in setting the tariff and creating a conducive policy environment is crucial for the growth of the solar PV sector.
  • Competition: The intense competition among developers highlights the need for a competitive market structure to ensure that the benefits of lower tariffs are passed on to consumers.
  • Environmental Sustainability: The case emphasizes the importance of balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability in the renewable energy sector.
  • Growth Strategy: The MNRE needs to develop a long-term growth strategy for the solar PV sector, considering factors like technological advancements and market trends.
  • Partnerships: The case highlights the potential for partnerships between the government, private sector, and financial institutions to support the growth of the solar PV sector.

4. Recommendations

The MNRE should implement a phased approach to solar PV tariff adjustments, combining market-driven mechanisms with strategic government interventions:

Phase 1: Short-Term (2018-2020):

  • Market-driven tariffs: Allow for competitive bidding, but with a minimum tariff floor to ensure financial viability for developers.
  • Financial support: Provide financial support through mechanisms like viability gap funding (VGF) for projects in remote or challenging locations.
  • Policy clarity: Communicate clearly the long-term policy vision for the solar PV sector, reducing uncertainty for developers.

Phase 2: Medium-Term (2021-2025):

  • Transition to a market-based tariff: Gradually reduce the reliance on government-set tariffs, moving towards a market-driven system.
  • Capacity building: Invest in capacity building for developers, focusing on financial management, risk assessment, and project implementation.
  • Technological innovation: Support research and development in solar PV technologies, including advanced energy storage solutions.

Phase 3: Long-Term (2026 onwards):

  • Mature market: Establish a mature market for solar PV, with a focus on efficiency, cost reduction, and grid integration.
  • Green bonds: Promote the issuance of green bonds to finance solar PV projects, attracting private capital.
  • International collaboration: Engage in international collaboration to share best practices and promote the adoption of solar PV technologies.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations consider the following:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations align with the MNRE's mission to promote renewable energy and achieve India's ambitious renewable energy targets.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations consider the needs of both solar PV developers and consumers, ensuring a balance between affordability and financial viability.
  • Competitors: The recommendations acknowledge the intense competition in the solar PV sector and aim to create a level playing field for developers.
  • Attractiveness ' quantitative measures: The recommendations aim to ensure that the tariffs set are attractive to investors, considering factors like ROI, risk, and project viability.

Assumptions:

  • The global solar PV module prices will continue to decline, but at a slower pace.
  • The financial stress in the sector will ease over time with improved project implementation and risk management.
  • The government will continue to provide policy support for the solar PV sector.

6. Conclusion

A phased approach to solar PV tariff adjustments, combining market-driven mechanisms with strategic government interventions, is the most effective way to balance the need for a competitive and sustainable solar energy sector with the goal of achieving India's ambitious renewable energy targets. This approach will ensure that the solar PV sector continues to grow while providing affordable and reliable energy to consumers.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Fixed tariffs: A fixed tariff system could provide greater certainty for developers, but it may stifle innovation and competition.
  • Subsidies: Subsidies could be used to incentivize solar PV development, but they can be costly and lead to dependence on government support.

Risks:

  • Market volatility: Fluctuations in global module prices and financial markets could impact the viability of solar PV projects.
  • Policy uncertainty: Changes in government policy could create uncertainty for developers and hinder investment.
  • Technological advancements: Rapid technological advancements could render existing projects obsolete.

Key assumptions:

  • The government will continue to provide policy support for the solar PV sector.
  • The global solar PV module prices will continue to decline, but at a slower pace.
  • The financial stress in the sector will ease over time with improved project implementation and risk management.

8. Next Steps

  • Develop a detailed implementation plan: Outline the specific steps and timelines for each phase of the tariff adjustment process.
  • Engage stakeholders: Consult with solar PV developers, financial institutions, and other stakeholders to gather feedback and build consensus.
  • Monitor progress: Regularly monitor the performance of the solar PV sector and adjust the tariff setting mechanism as needed.

By implementing these recommendations, the MNRE can ensure a sustainable and prosperous future for the solar PV sector in India, contributing significantly to the country's renewable energy goals.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018

Case Description

On April 26, 2017, Suniva Incorporated, a Chinese-owned U.S. manufacturer of solar cells and panels, filed a Section 201 trade case seeking protection-specifically, temporary relief-from foreign manufacturers of crystalline silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) cells and modules. U.S. trade law permits the president of the United States to grant some form of temporary relief against foreign imports that are found to officially injure a domestic industry. The filing ignited a firestorm of controversy in the solar industry inside and outside of the U.S. The sought-after protection was opposed by many renewable energy interest groups, including most of the U.S. solar energy industry itself. Opponents believed that a tariff on CSPV cells and modules would cost more jobs than they would save and, even with import protection, there was no future for CSPV manufacturing in the U.S.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018

The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018 FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018 ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018 case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018 & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018 solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018 to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018 ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018 case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - The Solar Photovoltaic Tariff of 2018




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.