Free Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return

"Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return" Harvard business case study is written by Ruth S.K. Tan, Zsuzsa R. Huszar, Weina Zhang. It deals with the challenges in the field of Finance. The case study is 3 page(s) long and it was first published on : Feb 2, 2016

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Lyxor Asset Management (Lyxor) adopt a multi-pronged approach to address the challenges presented by the diverging performance of its ChinaH and MSIndia funds. This approach involves enhancing portfolio diversification, optimizing risk management strategies, and leveraging technology and analytics to improve investment decision-making.

2. Background

This case study focuses on Lyxor Asset Management, a leading European asset management firm, facing a dilemma with its two emerging market funds: Lyxor ChinaH and Lyxor MSIndia. While ChinaH, focused on Chinese equities, has delivered strong returns, MSIndia, invested in Indian equities, has lagged behind. This disparity highlights the inherent risks and complexities of investing in emerging markets.

The main protagonists of the case study are:

  • Lyxor Asset Management: The asset management firm responsible for managing the two funds.
  • Jean-Marc Mercier: Head of Emerging Markets at Lyxor, tasked with resolving the performance discrepancy between the two funds.
  • The Investors: Individuals and institutions who have invested in the ChinaH and MSIndia funds, seeking attractive returns.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of portfolio management, risk management, and investment strategy.

Portfolio Management:

  • Diversification: The case highlights the importance of diversification in portfolio management. While ChinaH has outperformed, it exposes investors to significant country-specific risk.
  • Asset Allocation: Lyxor needs to re-evaluate its asset allocation strategy for MSIndia to improve its performance. This involves analyzing the underlying sectors and companies within the Indian market and identifying potential opportunities for growth.

Risk Management:

  • Market Risk: The case underscores the inherent market risk associated with emerging markets, particularly in the context of economic and political uncertainties.
  • Currency Risk: Both ChinaH and MSIndia are exposed to currency fluctuations, which can significantly impact returns.
  • Liquidity Risk: Emerging markets often exhibit lower liquidity compared to developed markets, making it challenging to exit positions quickly.

Investment Strategy:

  • Active vs. Passive Management: Lyxor needs to determine the optimal approach for managing its emerging market funds. Active management may be more suitable for capturing specific opportunities, while passive management can provide a more diversified and cost-effective solution.
  • Investment Style: Lyxor should consider adopting a value-oriented investment style for MSIndia, focusing on undervalued companies with strong fundamentals and growth potential.

4. Recommendations

To address the performance discrepancy between ChinaH and MSIndia, Lyxor should implement the following recommendations:

1. Enhance Portfolio Diversification:

  • Expand MSIndia's Investment Universe: Lyxor should broaden the scope of MSIndia's investment universe to include a wider range of sectors and companies, including those with strong growth potential in areas like technology, healthcare, and consumer goods.
  • Explore Alternative Asset Classes: Lyxor should consider adding alternative asset classes to MSIndia's portfolio, such as real estate, infrastructure, or private equity, to diversify risk and enhance returns.

2. Optimize Risk Management Strategies:

  • Implement Currency Hedging: Lyxor should consider hedging against currency fluctuations to mitigate the impact of exchange rate volatility on MSIndia's returns.
  • Utilize Derivatives: Lyxor can employ derivatives, such as options and futures, to manage market risk and enhance portfolio flexibility.
  • Develop a Robust Risk Monitoring Framework: Lyxor should establish a comprehensive risk monitoring framework to track and manage potential risks across its emerging market funds.

3. Leverage Technology and Analytics:

  • Utilize Advanced Analytics: Lyxor should invest in advanced analytics tools to improve investment decision-making, including risk assessment, portfolio optimization, and performance attribution.
  • Develop Data-Driven Insights: Lyxor should leverage data-driven insights to identify emerging trends and opportunities within the Indian market.
  • Enhance Reporting and Transparency: Lyxor should provide investors with clear and concise reports on the performance and risk profile of its emerging market funds.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: Lyxor's core competency lies in asset management, and these recommendations align with its mission to provide investors with attractive returns while managing risk effectively.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations cater to the needs of Lyxor's investors, who seek diversification, risk management, and transparency.
  • Competitors: Lyxor needs to stay competitive in the asset management industry by offering innovative and value-added products and services.
  • Attractiveness ' Quantitative Measures: The recommendations aim to improve MSIndia's performance, measured by metrics like return on investment (ROI), risk-adjusted returns, and Sharpe ratio.

Assumptions:

  • The Indian economy will continue to grow at a healthy pace, creating opportunities for investment.
  • Lyxor has the necessary resources and expertise to implement the recommended strategies effectively.
  • Investors will respond positively to the improved risk-return profile of MSIndia.

6. Conclusion

By implementing these recommendations, Lyxor can address the performance discrepancy between its ChinaH and MSIndia funds, enhance investor confidence, and maintain its position as a leading asset management firm.

7. Discussion

Alternative Options:

  • Liquidate MSIndia: This option would be a drastic measure and could negatively impact investor confidence.
  • Merge ChinaH and MSIndia: This would create a larger, more diversified fund but might not address the underlying issues.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Market Volatility: Emerging markets are inherently volatile, and the recommendations may not be effective in mitigating all risks.
  • Regulatory Changes: Changes in government policies or regulations could impact the performance of the funds.
  • Competition: Lyxor faces intense competition from other asset management firms.

8. Next Steps

  • Conduct a comprehensive review of MSIndia's portfolio.
  • Develop a detailed implementation plan for the recommended strategies.
  • Communicate the changes to investors and address any concerns.
  • Monitor the performance of MSIndia and adjust the strategies as needed.

By taking these steps, Lyxor can navigate the challenges of investing in emerging markets, achieve its investment objectives, and deliver value to its investors.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In September 2015, Susie reflected on the performance of her personal investment portfolio over the past seven years. Susie had invested in two exchange traded funds (ETFs): Lyxor ChinaH and Lyxor MSIndia. She was now considering Lyxor USDJIA as a third ETF to diversify her risk. This analysis would involve the concept of portfolio diversification and the application of the capital asset pricing model. In addition, Susie would need to calculate mean returns, standard deviations, covariances, correlations, betas, and required returns in order to fully assess the merits of her decision. Although Susie had been satisfied with her portfolio performance over the past seven years, the high growth in these two emerging markets had fizzled out lately. Should Susie diversify her portfolio or remain invested in China and India only?

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return

Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Lyxor ChinaH Versus Lyxor MSIndia: Portfolio Risk and Return




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.