Free Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd

"Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd" Harvard business case study is written by Akhileshwar Pathak. It deals with the challenges in the field of Business Ethics. The case study is 11 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 26, 2019

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that businesses prioritize transparency and ethical decision-making in all business dealings, especially when entering into agreements. This case study highlights the importance of corporate social responsibility and business ethics in maintaining a strong company reputation and fostering trust amongst stakeholders. We recommend implementing a robust code of conduct and a clear corporate governance framework to ensure that all business interactions are conducted with integrity and fairness.

2. Background

This case study revolves around a dispute between MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd (MWB) and Rock Advertising Ltd (Rock). Rock, a small advertising agency, entered into an oral agreement with MWB for office space. The agreement was later formalized in writing, but with a clause stating that any variation to the agreement must be in writing. Rock fell behind on payments, and MWB claimed that the oral agreement was superseded by the written one, rendering the oral agreement unenforceable. Rock, however, argued that the oral agreement was valid and that MWB had breached it by not allowing them to pay the rent in installments, as previously agreed upon orally.

The main protagonists are:

  • MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd: A company providing office space and services.
  • Rock Advertising Ltd: A small advertising agency renting office space from MWB.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study presents a complex legal and ethical dilemma. The key issues at play are:

  • The enforceability of oral agreements: While written agreements are generally preferred for legal certainty, the case raises the question of whether oral agreements can still be legally binding.
  • The impact of written variations clauses: The written agreement included a clause requiring any variations to be in writing. This clause raises questions about the extent to which oral agreements can be modified or superseded by written agreements.
  • The importance of good faith and fair dealing: Rock argued that MWB had acted in bad faith by not adhering to the oral agreement, even though it was not formally documented. This raises the issue of the ethical obligations of businesses to act fairly and honestly in their dealings with others.

Framework:

The analysis can be framed using the Stakeholder Theory, which emphasizes the importance of considering the interests of all stakeholders in decision-making. In this case, the stakeholders include:

  • MWB: Their interest lies in ensuring the timely payment of rent and maintaining a strong financial position.
  • Rock: Their interest lies in securing affordable office space and maintaining a positive relationship with MWB.
  • The Court: Their interest lies in upholding the law and ensuring fair outcomes for all parties involved.

4. Recommendations

  1. Implement a Clear and Transparent Contractual Framework: MWB should implement a clear and transparent contractual framework that outlines the terms of all agreements, including oral agreements. This framework should include a clear policy on the use of oral agreements and the process for formalizing them in writing.
  2. Develop a Robust Code of Conduct: MWB should develop a comprehensive code of conduct that emphasizes ethical decision-making, fair dealing, and transparency in all business interactions. This code should be communicated to all employees and enforced consistently.
  3. Embrace a Culture of Collaboration and Communication: MWB should foster a culture of open communication and collaboration with tenants. This includes actively listening to tenant concerns, being responsive to requests, and working towards mutually beneficial solutions.
  4. Invest in Legal Expertise: MWB should consult with legal experts to ensure that their contracts are drafted in a way that minimizes legal risks and protects their interests. This includes understanding the legal implications of oral agreements and written variations clauses.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core competencies and consistency with mission: Implementing a clear contractual framework and a robust code of conduct aligns with MWB's core values of integrity and fairness, strengthening its corporate social responsibility and company reputation.
  2. External customers and internal clients: These recommendations address the needs of both external customers (tenants) and internal clients (employees), promoting trust and transparency within the organization.
  3. Competitors: By demonstrating ethical business practices and a commitment to fairness, MWB can gain a competitive advantage in the market, attracting tenants who value these qualities.
  4. Attractiveness: A transparent and ethical approach to business dealings can enhance MWB's brand image, attracting investors and stakeholders who prioritize corporate governance and social responsibility.

6. Conclusion

The case of MWB v Rock highlights the importance of ethical leadership, transparency, and corporate governance in business. While oral agreements can be legally binding, businesses should prioritize written agreements to ensure clarity and minimize legal risks. By embracing a culture of ethical decision-making and fair dealing, businesses can foster trust and build strong relationships with stakeholders, ultimately contributing to a more ethical and sustainable business environment.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Ignoring the oral agreement: This would have been a legally viable option but would have damaged MWB's reputation and potentially led to future legal disputes.
  • Negotiating a new written agreement: This could have been a solution, but it would have been time-consuming and potentially costly.

Key assumptions:

  • The court's interpretation of the law regarding oral agreements and written variations clauses.
  • MWB's willingness to implement the recommendations and commit to a culture of ethical business practices.

8. Next Steps

  1. Develop a comprehensive code of conduct: This should be completed within 3 months.
  2. Implement a clear contractual framework: This should be completed within 6 months.
  3. Train employees on the code of conduct and contractual framework: This should be completed within 6 months.
  4. Conduct regular audits to ensure compliance with the code of conduct and contractual framework: This should be conducted annually.

By taking these steps, MWB can demonstrate its commitment to ethical business practices and build a strong foundation for sustainable growth.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR business ethics case study - Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd

Case Description

The founding principle of contracts is the freedom of the parties. The parties are free to choose their terms and follow any modality of communication, oral or written. As they can freely make a contract, they can freely modify or unmake it. Written contracts have a clause, No Oral Modification Clause (NOM Clause), precluding oral modifications of the contract. Irrespective of it, business persons make oral agreements modifying the contract, and later, dispute its validity. If the parties are free to contract, why should the oral agreement not be binding? In a NOM Clause then, ineffective? The United Kingdom Supreme Court, in MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd, explores this fundamental question on contract law.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Ethics case study - Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd

Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Ethics case study - Sanctity of Oral Agreements: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Business Ethics Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.