Free When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research

"When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research" Harvard business case study is written by Lauren H. Cohen, Umit G Gurun, Scott Duke Kominers, Sarah Mehta. It deals with the challenges in the field of Economics. The case study is 23 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jan 7, 2019

At Fern Fort University, we recommend Carbonite pursue a strategic acquisition of Oasis Research, focusing on integrating their technology and expertise into Carbonite's existing product offerings. This will enable Carbonite to expand its market reach, diversify its revenue streams, and establish a stronger foothold in the rapidly growing data backup and recovery market.

2. Background

This case study examines the strategic dilemma faced by Carbonite, a leading provider of online data backup and recovery services, as they consider acquiring Oasis Research, a smaller competitor specializing in data recovery software. Carbonite is seeking to expand its market share and address the growing threat from competitors like Mozy and Backblaze. Oasis Research, meanwhile, is struggling to compete with larger players and needs a strategic partner to accelerate its growth.

The main protagonists of the case study are:

  • Carbonite: A publicly traded company seeking to expand its market share and address the competitive landscape.
  • Oasis Research: A smaller competitor with specialized technology and a strong customer base.
  • Mozy and Backblaze: Major competitors posing a threat to Carbonite's market position.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case can be analyzed using the Porter's Five Forces framework to understand the competitive landscape and the attractiveness of the data backup and recovery market.

  • Threat of New Entrants: The market is relatively easy to enter, with low barriers to entry, leading to a high threat of new entrants. This is evidenced by the emergence of competitors like Mozy and Backblaze.
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers: Customers have a high bargaining power due to the availability of numerous alternatives, leading to price sensitivity and potential churn.
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Suppliers of technology and infrastructure have moderate bargaining power, as Carbonite and Oasis Research rely on these resources for their operations.
  • Threat of Substitute Products: The threat of substitute products is moderate, as alternative data storage solutions exist, such as local backups and cloud storage services.
  • Competitive Rivalry: The competitive rivalry is intense, with numerous players vying for market share, leading to aggressive pricing and marketing strategies.

Furthermore, the case study highlights the following key considerations:

  • Economics: The market is characterized by high growth potential, driven by the increasing demand for data backup and recovery solutions.
  • Technology and Analytics: Both Carbonite and Oasis Research possess valuable technology and analytics capabilities, which can be leveraged for competitive advantage.
  • Strategic Planning: Carbonite needs to develop a clear strategic plan to address the competitive landscape and achieve its growth objectives.
  • Financial Markets: The acquisition of Oasis Research presents both financial opportunities and risks, which need to be carefully evaluated.
  • Innovation: The rapid pace of technological innovation necessitates continuous investment in research and development to stay ahead of the competition.

4. Recommendations

Carbonite should acquire Oasis Research to achieve the following strategic objectives:

  1. Expand Market Reach: Oasis Research's customer base and expertise in data recovery software will provide Carbonite with access to new markets and customer segments.
  2. Diversify Revenue Streams: The acquisition will diversify Carbonite's revenue streams, reducing its reliance on online backup services and enhancing its overall financial stability.
  3. Strengthen Competitive Position: The acquisition will enable Carbonite to compete more effectively with larger players like Mozy and Backblaze by offering a wider range of products and services.
  4. Leverage Technology and Expertise: Integrating Oasis Research's technology and expertise into Carbonite's existing product offerings will enhance its capabilities and accelerate innovation.

To successfully execute the acquisition, Carbonite should:

  • Negotiate a favorable acquisition price: This should be based on a thorough financial analysis of Oasis Research's value and potential synergies with Carbonite.
  • Develop a clear integration plan: This should outline the steps for integrating Oasis Research's technology, personnel, and operations into Carbonite's existing infrastructure.
  • Communicate effectively with stakeholders: This includes informing employees, customers, and investors about the acquisition and its potential benefits.
  • Address potential antitrust concerns: Carbonite should carefully consider potential antitrust implications of the acquisition and proactively address any concerns raised by regulatory authorities.

5. Basis of Recommendations

This recommendation is based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The acquisition aligns with Carbonite's core competencies in data backup and recovery and its mission to provide reliable and secure data protection solutions.
  • External customers and internal clients: The acquisition will benefit both external customers by offering a wider range of products and services and internal clients by providing them with access to new technologies and expertise.
  • Competitors: The acquisition will strengthen Carbonite's competitive position by enabling it to compete more effectively with larger players in the market.
  • Attractiveness ' quantitative measures: The acquisition is expected to be financially attractive, based on the potential for revenue growth, cost synergies, and market share expansion.
  • Assumptions: The recommendation assumes that the integration of Oasis Research's technology and operations into Carbonite's existing infrastructure will be successful and that the acquisition will not face significant regulatory hurdles.

6. Conclusion

Acquiring Oasis Research presents a strategic opportunity for Carbonite to expand its market reach, diversify its revenue streams, and strengthen its competitive position in the rapidly growing data backup and recovery market. By leveraging the combined strengths of both companies, Carbonite can achieve its growth objectives and solidify its leadership in the industry.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Organic growth: Carbonite could focus on organic growth by investing in research and development, expanding its marketing efforts, and developing new product offerings. However, this approach would be slower and less impactful than an acquisition.
  • Strategic partnership: Carbonite could enter into a strategic partnership with Oasis Research, sharing resources and expertise without acquiring the company. However, this approach would lack the control and integration benefits of an acquisition.

The recommendation is subject to the following risks and key assumptions:

  • Integration challenges: Integrating Oasis Research's technology and operations into Carbonite's existing infrastructure could be challenging and time-consuming.
  • Antitrust scrutiny: The acquisition could face regulatory scrutiny from antitrust authorities, potentially delaying or preventing the deal.
  • Customer churn: The acquisition could lead to customer churn if Oasis Research's customers are not satisfied with Carbonite's products and services.

8. Next Steps

To implement the recommendation, Carbonite should:

  • Conduct due diligence: Conduct a thorough financial and operational due diligence of Oasis Research to assess its value and potential synergies.
  • Negotiate acquisition terms: Negotiate a favorable acquisition price and structure with Oasis Research's management.
  • Secure financing: Secure financing for the acquisition, potentially through debt or equity financing.
  • Develop integration plan: Develop a detailed integration plan outlining the steps for merging Oasis Research's technology, personnel, and operations into Carbonite's existing infrastructure.
  • Communicate with stakeholders: Communicate the acquisition to employees, customers, and investors, addressing any concerns and highlighting the potential benefits.
  • Address regulatory concerns: Proactively address any potential antitrust concerns raised by regulatory authorities.

By following these steps, Carbonite can successfully acquire Oasis Research and leverage the acquisition to achieve its strategic objectives and solidify its leadership in the data backup and recovery market.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Economics case study - When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research

Case Description

This case, set in October 2017, follows Danielle Sheer, general counsel for Carbonite, as she defends the company against claims of patent infringement. It provides a broad overview of the U.S. patent system and explores the impact that non-practicing entities (sometimes also called "patent trolls") can have on companies.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Economics case study - When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research

When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Economics case study - When Trolls Attack: Carbonite vs. Oasis Research




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.