Free Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A) Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)

"Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)" Harvard business case study is written by Steven Callander. It deals with the challenges in the field of Business & Government Relations. The case study is 11 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jan 8, 2018

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Sunrun aggressively pursue a multi-pronged strategy to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape in Nevada. This strategy should encompass active engagement with policymakers, strategic partnerships with local stakeholders, and innovative business model adaptations to ensure continued growth and profitability in the face of net metering policy changes.

2. Background

The case study focuses on Sunrun, a leading residential solar provider, facing the challenge of a proposed change to Nevada's net metering policy in 2017. This policy change would significantly reduce the value of solar energy credits for homeowners, potentially impacting Sunrun's business model and profitability. The case highlights the complex interplay between government policy and regulation, business strategy, and the evolving solar energy market.

The main protagonists are:

  • Sunrun: A company navigating the complex regulatory landscape and seeking to maintain its market position.
  • Nevada Public Utilities Commission (PUC): The regulatory body responsible for setting net metering policies.
  • Nevada Legislature: The body responsible for enacting legislation impacting the energy sector.
  • Nevada Governor: The executive branch responsible for approving or vetoing legislation.
  • Solar industry stakeholders: Other solar companies, advocacy groups, and consumers who are impacted by the net metering policy.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of competitive strategy, government relations, and business model innovation.

Competitive Strategy:

  • Porter's Five Forces: The case highlights the competitive forces at play in the solar energy market, including the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, and the intensity of rivalry among existing players.
  • Competitive Advantage: Sunrun's competitive advantage lies in its established brand, strong customer base, and operational efficiency. However, the proposed policy change could erode this advantage by making solar less attractive to consumers.
  • Strategic Positioning: Sunrun needs to adapt its strategic positioning to address the changing regulatory landscape. This may involve focusing on niche markets, developing new business models, or expanding into other states with favorable policies.

Government Relations:

  • Lobbying Strategies: Sunrun must engage in effective lobbying efforts to influence policymakers and advocate for its interests. This includes building relationships with key legislators, participating in public hearings, and mobilizing its customer base.
  • Corporate Political Activity: Sunrun needs to develop a comprehensive strategy for corporate political activity, including engaging in campaign finance, supporting political candidates, and advocating for policy changes.
  • Public-Private Partnerships: Sunrun can explore opportunities for public-private partnerships with the government to promote solar energy adoption and address the concerns of utility companies.

Business Model Innovation:

  • Value Proposition: Sunrun needs to re-evaluate its value proposition to customers in light of the proposed policy change. This may involve offering new financing options, bundled services, or enhanced customer support.
  • Revenue Model: Sunrun may need to explore alternative revenue models to compensate for the reduced value of net metering credits. This could include selling solar energy directly to utilities, providing energy storage solutions, or developing new business lines.
  • Operating Model: Sunrun may need to adapt its operating model to optimize efficiency and profitability in a changing regulatory environment. This could involve streamlining processes, reducing costs, or expanding into new markets.

4. Recommendations

Sunrun should implement the following recommendations to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape in Nevada:

  1. Engage in Proactive Lobbying and Advocacy: Sunrun should invest in a robust lobbying strategy to influence the Nevada PUC and Legislature. This includes building strong relationships with key policymakers, participating in public hearings, and mobilizing its customer base to advocate for favorable net metering policies.
  2. Form Strategic Partnerships: Sunrun should seek strategic partnerships with local stakeholders, such as utility companies, community groups, and environmental organizations. These partnerships can help build support for solar energy adoption and address the concerns of policymakers.
  3. Develop Innovative Business Models: Sunrun should explore innovative business models to adapt to the changing regulatory landscape. This could include offering bundled services, such as energy storage or home automation, or developing new revenue streams, such as selling solar energy directly to utilities.
  4. Focus on Customer Value: Sunrun should continue to prioritize customer value by offering competitive pricing, reliable service, and innovative solutions. This includes providing clear and transparent information about the impacts of the net metering policy change on customers.
  5. Diversify Geographic Footprint: Sunrun should consider expanding its operations into other states with favorable policies for solar energy adoption. This diversification strategy can mitigate the risks associated with regulatory changes in a single state.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: Sunrun's core competencies lie in its expertise in solar technology, project development, and customer service. These recommendations align with Sunrun's mission to provide clean and affordable energy to homeowners.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations address the needs of both external customers, who want affordable and reliable solar energy, and internal clients, who want to maintain profitability and growth.
  • Competitors: The recommendations consider the competitive landscape in the solar energy market and aim to maintain Sunrun's competitive advantage.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are expected to be attractive in terms of financial returns, considering the potential for increased market share, new revenue streams, and reduced regulatory risk.

6. Conclusion

Sunrun faces a significant challenge in navigating the evolving regulatory landscape in Nevada. However, by proactively engaging with policymakers, forming strategic partnerships, and adapting its business model, Sunrun can maintain its market position and continue to grow in the face of these challenges. The company's ability to effectively manage these complexities will determine its long-term success in the solar energy market.

7. Discussion

Alternatives not selected:

  • Aggressive price cuts: While this could temporarily increase sales, it would likely erode profitability and be unsustainable in the long term.
  • Complete withdrawal from Nevada: This would abandon a significant market and potentially damage Sunrun's reputation.

Risks and key assumptions:

  • Policy uncertainty: The regulatory landscape could change further, creating additional challenges for Sunrun.
  • Customer acceptance: Customers may not be receptive to new business models or price increases.
  • Competition: Other solar companies may adopt similar strategies, intensifying competition.

8. Next Steps

Sunrun should implement the following steps to execute its strategy:

  • Within 3 months: Establish a dedicated team to manage government relations and lobbying efforts.
  • Within 6 months: Develop a comprehensive plan for strategic partnerships and identify potential partners.
  • Within 12 months: Launch pilot programs for new business models and gather customer feedback.
  • Ongoing: Continuously monitor the regulatory landscape, adjust strategies as needed, and communicate transparently with customers.

By taking these steps, Sunrun can effectively navigate the changing regulatory environment in Nevada and position itself for long-term success in the solar energy market.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In 2015, the Nevada Public Utility Commission (PUC) passed a ruling that essentially eliminated net metering, dramatically reducing the compensation rate for home solar owners selling excess electricity back to the utility company. As a result, solar companies, including Sunrun, were forced to close down operations, severing 3,000 industry jobs. This case profiles the PUC's decision, and Sunrun's strategy in dealing with out-of-market forces in order to retain a sales presence in the state of Nevada.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)

Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A) FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A) ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A) case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A). Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A) & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A) solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Business Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A) to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A) ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A) case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient human resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Sunrun in 2017: Net Metering in Nevada (A)




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.