Harvard Case - Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal
"Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal" Harvard business case study is written by David A. Moss, Marc Campasano, Dean Grodzins. It deals with the challenges in the field of Business & Government Relations. The case study is 26 page(s) long and it was first published on : Feb 10, 2016
At Fern Fort University, we recommend a comprehensive analysis of the Cherokee Removal, focusing on the interplay between business and government relations, government policy and regulation, and international relations. This analysis will shed light on the historical context of the removal, the economic motives driving it, and the long-term consequences for both the Cherokee people and the United States.
2. Background
This case study examines the forced relocation of the Cherokee Nation from their ancestral lands in the Southeast to present-day Oklahoma during the 1830s. The removal, known as the 'Trail of Tears,' was a tragic event that resulted in the deaths of thousands of Cherokees due to disease, starvation, and exposure.
The main protagonists in this case are the Cherokee Nation, the U.S. government, and various individuals and corporations involved in the land acquisition and development of Cherokee territory. The case highlights the complex dynamics between indigenous sovereignty, federal government authority, and the pursuit of economic growth and resource exploitation.
3. Analysis of the Case Study
This case can be analyzed through the lens of business history, international relations, and corporate social responsibility.
- Business History: The case reveals the role of business and government relations in shaping the removal. The U.S. government's desire for economic growth and access to valuable resources, coupled with the expansionist ambitions of white settlers, fueled the demand for Cherokee lands.
- International Relations: The Cherokee Nation's struggle for sovereignty and self-determination against the encroaching power of the U.S. government highlights the complexities of international relations and the challenges faced by indigenous peoples in asserting their rights.
- Corporate Social Responsibility: The case raises critical questions about corporate social responsibility and the ethical implications of business practices that contribute to the displacement and dispossession of indigenous communities.
Key Frameworks:
- Power Dynamics: The case exemplifies the imbalance of power between the Cherokee Nation and the U.S. government, highlighting the influence of political pressure and lobbying strategies in shaping policy decisions.
- Resource Exploitation: The case underscores the historical pattern of resource extraction and land acquisition by powerful entities at the expense of indigenous communities.
- Economic Incentives: The case reveals how economic motives, including the desire for land ownership, resource development, and economic expansion, drove the decision-making process surrounding the Cherokee Removal.
4. Recommendations
- Historical Research and Education: Conduct thorough research into the Cherokee Removal, focusing on the economic, political, and social factors that contributed to the event. This research should include interviews with Cherokee elders and descendants, archival research, and analysis of primary sources. The findings should be disseminated through educational programs, museum exhibits, and public outreach initiatives to raise awareness about the historical injustices suffered by the Cherokee people.
- Reconciliation and Reparations: Acknowledge the historical wrongdoings of the U.S. government and engage in meaningful dialogue with the Cherokee Nation to explore ways to achieve reconciliation. This could include formal apologies, reparations for lost lands and resources, and the establishment of a joint commission to address historical grievances.
- Modern-day Implications: Analyze the long-term consequences of the Cherokee Removal on the Cherokee people and the United States. This analysis should consider the impact on economic development, cultural preservation, and social justice. The findings should inform contemporary policies and practices aimed at promoting indigenous rights, self-determination, and economic empowerment.
5. Basis of Recommendations
These recommendations are based on the following considerations:
- Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: This project aligns with Fern Fort University's commitment to historical research, social justice, and indigenous studies.
- External Customers and Internal Clients: This project will benefit the Cherokee Nation, the broader indigenous community, and the general public by promoting understanding and reconciliation.
- Competitors: This project will contribute to the growing body of scholarship on indigenous history and rights, engaging with other institutions and researchers working on similar issues.
- Attractiveness: This project has the potential to make a significant impact on the understanding and redress of historical injustices.
6. Conclusion
The Cherokee Removal is a tragic chapter in American history that highlights the complex interplay between business, government, and indigenous rights. By analyzing this event through a multi-faceted lens, we can gain valuable insights into the historical context of economic development, government policy, and international relations. This analysis can inform contemporary efforts to promote social justice, indigenous self-determination, and sustainable development.
7. Discussion
Other alternatives to the recommended course of action include:
- Focusing solely on economic analysis: This approach would limit the scope of the project and fail to address the broader social and political implications of the Cherokee Removal.
- Ignoring the historical context: This approach would prevent a comprehensive understanding of the event and its long-term consequences.
Risks and Key Assumptions:
- Resistance from certain stakeholders: Some individuals and groups may resist efforts to acknowledge and address historical injustices.
- Lack of funding and resources: The project may face challenges in securing funding and resources to conduct thorough research and implement recommendations.
8. Next Steps
- Establish a research team: Assemble a team of scholars, historians, and indigenous experts to conduct the research.
- Secure funding: Seek funding from foundations, government agencies, and private donors to support the project.
- Develop a research plan: Outline the research methodology, data collection methods, and timeline for the project.
- Engage with the Cherokee Nation: Establish a collaborative partnership with the Cherokee Nation to ensure that the project is conducted in a culturally sensitive and respectful manner.
- Disseminate findings: Publish research findings in academic journals, present at conferences, and develop educational materials for public consumption.
This comprehensive approach will contribute to a deeper understanding of the Cherokee Removal and its lasting impact, fostering reconciliation and promoting social justice.
Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal
more similar case solutions ...
Case Description
By the mid-1830s, the U.S. Government and the State of Georgia had for years been pushing the Cherokees to turn all of their territory over to white settlers and move west, yet it appeared that most Cherokees wanted to keep their ancestral homeland. In October 1835, the Cherokee General Council had named a committee of leaders to work out a mutually agreeable solution with the federal government in Washington. At about the same time, however, U.S. Indian Commissioner John Schermerhorn had called a meeting at New Echota, Georgia with a separate committee of Cherokees who he believed would be more willing to "remove" the entire tribe to the West. This separate committee ultimately agreed to the Treaty of New Echota on December 29, 1835. Under the treaty, the Cherokees would cede all of their eastern territory in exchange for $4.5 million, land in the West, and other sundry benefits. U.S. President Andrew Jackson, who had battled Native American tribes during much of his former military career, was eager to oust the Cherokees from the eastern states. However, several members of the Senate criticized the Treaty of New Echota as a "phantom treaty," claiming that it was signed by an illegitimate council without the consent of the Cherokee people. Approving the treaty, they insisted, would be a grave wrong against the Cherokee Nation and its official government, which the United States had long recognized. On May 18, 1836, the U.S. Senate finally put the Treaty of New Echota to a vote. If ratified, the treaty would bind all Cherokees to the decisions of the committee at New Echota, and the Cherokee Nation would have to leave its native land.
🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal
Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal
Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal FAQ
What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal" case study?
Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.
How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?
We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.
What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?
The Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.
Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?
At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.
I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal. Where can I get it?
You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal" at Fern Fort University.
Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?
Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.
Can I hire someone only to analyze my Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.
🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal
Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?
You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal" at Fern Fort University.
Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Business Review Case Studies?
Some of our all time favorite case studies are -
Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal"?
Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.
Do I have to upload case material for the case study Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal to buy a custom case study solution?
We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.
What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal case study?
The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Democracy, Sovereignty, and the Struggle over Cherokee Removal" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.
"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?
Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.
Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies
How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?
We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient human resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time
What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?
We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.
How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?
All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered
How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?
We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).