Free Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

"Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership" Harvard business case study is written by Anjani Datla, Robert Lawrence. It deals with the challenges in the field of Business & Government Relations. The case study is 20 page(s) long and it was first published on : Aug 20, 2015

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a comprehensive approach to analyzing the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) that considers the intricate interplay between business and government relations, international relations, and economic policy. This approach should prioritize corporate social responsibility, environmental sustainability, and stakeholder engagement, while recognizing the potential for innovation, economic growth, and job creation.

2. Background

The case study focuses on the TTIP, a proposed trade agreement between the United States and the European Union. The agreement aimed to eliminate tariffs, harmonize regulations, and facilitate trade and investment between the two economic powerhouses. The case study explores the complex political, economic, and social implications of the TTIP, highlighting the diverse perspectives of stakeholders, including businesses, labor unions, environmental groups, and governments.

The main protagonists are the US and EU governments, who are driving the negotiations, and the various stakeholders, who are advocating for their interests and influencing the direction of the agreement.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed using a framework that integrates international relations, economic policy, and corporate strategy.

International Relations:

  • Globalization: The TTIP is a manifestation of globalization, seeking to further integrate the US and EU economies. This integration has the potential to create new opportunities but also raises concerns about sovereignty, labor standards, and environmental protection.
  • Trade Policy: The TTIP aimed to liberalize trade by reducing tariffs and harmonizing regulations. This could lead to increased trade and investment, but it also risks exacerbating existing inequalities and undermining domestic industries.
  • International Business: The TTIP would have profound implications for multinational corporations (MNCs) operating in both the US and EU. It could create new opportunities for expansion and investment but also require companies to navigate complex regulatory environments.

Economic Policy:

  • Economic Growth: The TTIP was projected to boost economic growth in both the US and EU by facilitating trade and investment. However, the distribution of these benefits was a key concern, as some sectors and regions could experience negative impacts.
  • Competitive Strategy: The TTIP could reshape the competitive landscape in both the US and EU, creating new opportunities for some businesses while posing challenges for others. Companies need to adapt their strategies to navigate these changes and leverage the opportunities presented by the agreement.
  • Financial Markets: The TTIP could have significant implications for financial markets, potentially leading to increased integration and liquidity. However, it also raises concerns about financial instability and the potential for regulatory arbitrage.

Corporate Strategy:

  • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The TTIP presented an opportunity for businesses to demonstrate their commitment to CSR by engaging in responsible trade practices and promoting sustainable development. However, the agreement also raised concerns about the potential for corporations to exploit loopholes and undermine environmental and labor standards.
  • Innovation: The TTIP could foster innovation by promoting collaboration between US and EU businesses and facilitating the exchange of knowledge and technology. However, it also raises concerns about the potential for intellectual property rights to be eroded.
  • Risk Management: Companies need to carefully assess the risks and opportunities associated with the TTIP and develop strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts while maximizing potential benefits. This includes understanding the potential for regulatory changes, trade disputes, and political instability.

4. Recommendations

  1. Prioritize Stakeholder Engagement: Governments should actively engage with all stakeholders, including businesses, labor unions, environmental groups, and civil society organizations, throughout the negotiation process. This engagement should be transparent and inclusive, ensuring that all voices are heard and that the agreement reflects the needs and concerns of all stakeholders.
  2. Promote Sustainable Development: The TTIP should prioritize sustainable development by incorporating strong environmental and labor standards. This includes addressing concerns about climate change, biodiversity loss, and worker rights.
  3. Foster Innovation and Competitiveness: The agreement should promote innovation and competitiveness by facilitating the exchange of knowledge and technology between the US and EU. This could involve supporting research and development collaborations, promoting open data initiatives, and streamlining regulatory processes for new technologies.
  4. Address Concerns about Inequality: The TTIP should address concerns about inequality by ensuring that the benefits of the agreement are shared equitably across all sectors and regions. This could involve providing support to workers who may be negatively impacted by the agreement, investing in skills development, and promoting inclusive economic growth.
  5. Strengthen Regulatory Cooperation: The TTIP should strengthen regulatory cooperation between the US and EU, ensuring that regulations are harmonized in a way that benefits businesses and consumers without compromising environmental or labor standards. This could involve establishing joint regulatory bodies, sharing best practices, and promoting mutual recognition of standards.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The TTIP should be consistent with the core competencies and missions of both the US and EU, promoting economic growth, job creation, and sustainable development.
  2. External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations consider the needs and concerns of both external customers (consumers, businesses, and investors) and internal clients (governments and stakeholders).
  3. Competitors: The recommendations acknowledge the competitive landscape and seek to ensure that the TTIP does not create unfair advantages for any particular country or sector.
  4. Attractiveness: The recommendations are based on the potential for the TTIP to generate positive economic and social outcomes, including increased trade, investment, and job creation.

All assumptions regarding the potential impacts of the TTIP, including economic growth, job creation, and environmental sustainability, are explicitly stated and based on available data and expert analysis.

6. Conclusion

The TTIP presented a significant opportunity to enhance economic cooperation between the US and EU. However, the agreement faced significant challenges, including concerns about the potential for job losses, environmental damage, and the erosion of democratic accountability. To ensure the success of the TTIP, it was crucial to prioritize stakeholder engagement, sustainable development, innovation, and equity. By addressing these concerns and building a consensus among stakeholders, the TTIP could have served as a model for future trade agreements, promoting economic growth, job creation, and global prosperity.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives to the TTIP include:

  • Bilateral Trade Agreements: The US and EU could have pursued bilateral trade agreements with individual countries, potentially leading to more tailored agreements that address specific concerns.
  • Regional Trade Agreements: The US and EU could have focused on strengthening existing regional trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA).
  • No Agreement: The US and EU could have chosen not to pursue a trade agreement, maintaining existing trade arrangements.

The risks associated with the TTIP included:

  • Job Losses: The agreement could have led to job losses in certain sectors, particularly manufacturing and agriculture.
  • Environmental Damage: The agreement could have weakened environmental regulations and led to increased pollution.
  • Erosion of Democratic Accountability: The agreement could have given corporations more power over governments and undermined democratic processes.

The key assumptions underlying the recommendations include:

  • Economic Growth: The TTIP was expected to boost economic growth in both the US and EU.
  • Job Creation: The agreement was projected to create new jobs in both countries.
  • Environmental Sustainability: The agreement was expected to promote sustainable development.

8. Next Steps

To implement the recommendations, the following steps should be taken:

  • Stakeholder Engagement: Governments should establish mechanisms for ongoing stakeholder engagement, including regular consultations, public hearings, and online forums.
  • Sustainable Development: Governments should develop and implement policies to ensure that the TTIP promotes sustainable development, including strong environmental and labor standards.
  • Innovation and Competitiveness: Governments should invest in research and development, promote open data initiatives, and streamline regulatory processes for new technologies.
  • Addressing Inequality: Governments should implement policies to address concerns about inequality, including providing support to workers who may be negatively impacted by the agreement and investing in skills development.
  • Regulatory Cooperation: Governments should establish joint regulatory bodies, share best practices, and promote mutual recognition of standards.

These steps should be implemented over a timeline of several years, with key milestones established for each phase of the process. By taking these steps, the TTIP could have become a model for future trade agreements, promoting economic growth, job creation, and global prosperity.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In July 2013, more than 150 negotiators from the European Union and the United States converged in Washington, D.C. to begin crafting what could become the world's largest free trade agreement-the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Billed as a transformational trade accord, the TTIP would go beyond tariffs to cut non-tariff barriers, expand trade in services, streamline regulatory standards, and incorporate trade elements to suit a rapidly evolving global economy. American and European leaders had pushed for the TTIP in the hope that it would provide a much-needed boost to struggling American and European economies, which were mired in recession and high unemployment since 2008, and buckling under rising competition from China. But the negotiators, faced a sobering reality, "the reason we have not had a trade agreement like this between ourselves in the last several decades isn't because nobody thought of it," said Michael Froman, United States Trade Representative. "It's because there have always been issues that have tripped us up." Under intense political pressure and rising public scrutiny, will the negotiating teams be able to reduce trade barriers between the two economic giants? This case explores how in the absence of multilateral trade liberalization, regional trade agreements are becoming increasingly popular. With an in-depth account of the political and technical challenges in negotiating a mega regional accord, the case questions if political will or the need for economic growth can overcome longtime barriers to deeper trade integration.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Business Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient human resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Setting the Standard in Free Trade: The Making of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.