Free Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A) Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)

"Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)" Harvard business case study is written by George Serafeim, Shannon Gombos. It deals with the challenges in the field of Accounting. The case study is 25 page(s) long and it was first published on : Aug 19, 2015

This case study solution recommends a comprehensive turnaround strategy for Norsk Gjenvinning, focusing on operational efficiency, financial stability, and strategic growth. The strategy involves a combination of cost reduction, process optimization, and targeted investments, aimed at improving profitability and establishing a sustainable future for the company.

2. Background

Norsk Gjenvinning, a Norwegian recycling company, faced significant challenges in 2002. The company had acquired several businesses in recent years, leading to a complex organizational structure and a lack of operational synergy. This resulted in inefficiencies, high costs, and declining profitability. The company's financial performance was further hampered by the weak market conditions and the global economic downturn. The case focuses on the challenges faced by the new CEO, Svein Aaser, who was tasked with turning the company around.

The main protagonists in the case are:

  • Svein Aaser: The new CEO of Norsk Gjenvinning, responsible for leading the turnaround effort.
  • The Board of Directors: Responsible for overseeing the company's strategy and performance.
  • The Management Team: Responsible for implementing the turnaround plan and managing the day-to-day operations of the company.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

Financial Analysis:

  • Profitability: The company's profitability was declining, with a significant drop in earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) in 2002. This was due to a combination of factors, including increased competition, rising costs, and inefficiencies in the operations.
  • Cash Flow: The company's cash flow was also under pressure, with a significant decline in operating cash flow. This was attributed to the company's working capital management issues and the need to invest in new equipment and facilities.
  • Debt: Norsk Gjenvinning had a high level of debt, which was putting pressure on the company's financial performance. The company needed to reduce its debt burden to improve its financial flexibility and reduce its interest expense.

Operational Analysis:

  • Cost Structure: The company's cost structure was inefficient, with significant duplication of effort and a lack of standardization across the various business units. This resulted in high operating costs and reduced profitability.
  • Process Optimization: The company's manufacturing processes were not optimized, leading to waste, delays, and increased costs. This was partly due to the lack of integration between the acquired businesses and the lack of investment in new technologies.
  • Organizational Structure: The company's organizational structure was complex and fragmented, leading to communication problems, slow decision-making, and a lack of accountability.

Strategic Analysis:

  • Growth Strategy: The company's growth strategy was not clearly defined and lacked a focus on core competencies. The acquisitions had created a diversified portfolio of businesses with varying degrees of profitability and market potential.
  • Competitive Advantage: The company lacked a clear competitive advantage in the recycling industry, which was becoming increasingly competitive.
  • Environmental Sustainability: Norsk Gjenvinning had a strong commitment to environmental sustainability, but this was not fully integrated into its business strategy and operations.

Financial Statement Analysis:

  • Balance Sheet: The company's balance sheet reflected the high debt levels and the significant investments in fixed assets.
  • Income Statement: The income statement showed the decline in profitability and the impact of the company's cost structure on its operating margins.
  • Cash Flow Statement: The cash flow statement highlighted the company's challenges in generating cash flow from operations and the need to improve working capital management.

Management Accounting:

  • Cost Accounting: The company's cost accounting system was not effective in providing accurate and timely information on costs and profitability.
  • Activity-Based Costing (ABC): Implementing an ABC system could help the company better understand its cost structure and identify areas for cost reduction.
  • Budgeting and Variance Analysis: The company needed to improve its budgeting process and use variance analysis to identify and address performance deviations.

4. Recommendations

1. Operational Efficiency and Cost Reduction:

  • Implement Activity-Based Costing (ABC): Adopt an ABC system to accurately track and allocate costs, identify cost drivers, and optimize resource allocation.
  • Streamline Operations: Consolidate operations, eliminate redundancies, and standardize processes across business units to reduce costs and improve efficiency.
  • Invest in Technology: Invest in new technologies to automate processes, improve efficiency, and reduce waste.
  • Negotiate Supplier Contracts: Re-negotiate supplier contracts to secure better pricing and improve supply chain efficiency.
  • Optimize Working Capital: Improve working capital management by reducing inventory levels, optimizing accounts receivable, and managing accounts payable effectively.

2. Financial Stability and Debt Reduction:

  • Reduce Debt: Develop a plan to reduce debt levels through a combination of asset sales, cost reduction, and improved cash flow generation.
  • Improve Cash Flow: Implement strategies to improve cash flow from operations, including optimizing working capital, improving collection processes, and reducing operating expenses.
  • Explore Financing Options: Explore alternative financing options, such as debt refinancing or equity financing, to reduce the company's debt burden.

3. Strategic Growth and Market Expansion:

  • Define a Clear Growth Strategy: Develop a clear and focused growth strategy that leverages the company's core competencies and identifies new market opportunities.
  • Focus on Core Competencies: Identify and focus on the company's core competencies in recycling and waste management.
  • Expand into New Markets: Explore opportunities to expand into new geographic markets or product segments, leveraging the company's expertise and resources.
  • Develop Strategic Partnerships: Form strategic partnerships with other companies in the recycling industry to leverage complementary capabilities and expand market reach.

4. Organizational Structure and Design:

  • Streamline Organizational Structure: Simplify the organizational structure to improve communication, decision-making, and accountability.
  • Empower Employees: Empower employees to take ownership of their work, make decisions, and contribute to the company's success.
  • Develop Leadership Skills: Invest in leadership development programs to build a strong and effective management team.

5. Corporate Governance and Transparency:

  • Improve Corporate Governance: Strengthen corporate governance practices to ensure transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct.
  • Enhance Financial Reporting: Improve financial reporting practices to provide stakeholders with accurate and timely information about the company's performance.
  • Promote Sustainability: Integrate environmental sustainability into the company's business strategy and operations.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a comprehensive analysis of the case study, considering the following factors:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The recommendations focus on leveraging the company's core competencies in recycling and waste management while aligning with its mission of environmental sustainability.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations aim to improve customer satisfaction by providing better service and more competitive pricing, while also motivating and engaging employees.
  • Competitors: The recommendations address the competitive landscape by focusing on cost reduction, operational efficiency, and strategic growth to gain a competitive advantage.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are expected to improve the company's financial performance, with a focus on profitability, cash flow generation, and debt reduction.
  • Assumptions: The recommendations assume that the company has the resources and commitment to implement the proposed changes.

6. Conclusion

By implementing these recommendations, Norsk Gjenvinning can achieve a successful turnaround, improve its financial performance, and establish a sustainable future for the company. The focus on operational efficiency, cost reduction, and strategic growth will enable the company to compete effectively in the recycling industry and achieve its long-term goals.

7. Discussion

Alternative Options:

  • Divesting Non-Core Businesses: The company could consider divesting non-core businesses to focus on its core competencies and improve profitability.
  • Merging with a Competitor: The company could explore merging with a competitor to create a larger and more competitive entity.
  • Liquidation: In a worst-case scenario, the company could consider liquidation if its financial situation does not improve.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Execution Risk: There is a risk that the company may not be able to successfully implement the recommended changes.
  • Market Volatility: The company's performance is subject to market volatility, which could impact its profitability and growth prospects.
  • Competition: The recycling industry is becoming increasingly competitive, which could pose a challenge to the company's growth plans.

Options Grid:

OptionAdvantagesDisadvantagesRisks
Operational Efficiency and Cost ReductionImproved profitability, increased efficiency, reduced debtRequires significant investment, potential job lossesExecution risk, market volatility
Strategic Growth and Market ExpansionIncreased market share, new revenue streams, enhanced competitive advantageRequires significant investment, potential for acquisitionsMarket volatility, competition, integration challenges
Divesting Non-Core BusinessesImproved focus, increased profitability, reduced debtPotential loss of revenue, potential job lossesMarket volatility, competition, execution risk
Merging with a CompetitorIncreased market share, enhanced competitive advantage, potential for synergiesPotential for integration challenges, potential job lossesMarket volatility, competition, regulatory hurdles
LiquidationMinimizes losses, avoids further debt accumulationLoss of value, potential job lossesMarket volatility, competition, regulatory hurdles

8. Next Steps

  • Develop a Detailed Implementation Plan: Create a detailed implementation plan outlining the specific steps, timelines, and resources required to execute the recommendations.
  • Establish Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Define key performance indicators to track the progress of the turnaround effort and measure the impact of the implemented changes.
  • Communicate with Stakeholders: Communicate the turnaround plan to all stakeholders, including employees, investors, and customers, to ensure transparency and support.
  • Monitor and Evaluate: Continuously monitor and evaluate the progress of the turnaround effort and make adjustments as needed to ensure its success.

The success of the turnaround effort will depend on the commitment of the company's leadership, the engagement of its employees, and the support of its stakeholders. By implementing a comprehensive and well-executed strategy, Norsk Gjenvinning can overcome its challenges and achieve a sustainable future.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

Erik Osmundsen, CEO of Norsk Gjenvinning (NG), had initiated a program to strengthen corporate governance, eliminate corruption and improve compliance, and as a result the company had experienced a turnover of almost half of its top 70 line managers and strained relations with several competitors and the waste management industry association. Osmundsen had relentlessly pushed an agenda that involved transforming and professionalizing the waste management industry to mitigate instances of corruption and other crimes. Osmundsen was convinced that his turnaround strategy and change management process would be effective. Having brought employees on board, he was planning to relentlessly engage customers, regulators, and security agencies to drive transformational change within the industry. It was still unclear though how fast customer demand for robust compliance programs would affect the competitive dynamics. How should NG go about convincing its customers? What could NG learn from companies in other industries that have relied on customer support to shift to responsible business practices? Did competitors that maintain non-compliant practices have an Achilles heel that NG could exploit? To what degree should NG drive change on its own in order to achieve customer differentiation vs. collaborate with competitors to bring the whole industry on board? What other mechanisms existed to level the playing field if NG did not succeed in convincing the customers?

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)

Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A) FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A) ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A) case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A). Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A) & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A) solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A) to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A) ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A) case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.