Free Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117

"Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117" Harvard business case study is written by Christopher Canellos, David W. Hoyt. It deals with the challenges in the field of Accounting. The case study is 42 page(s) long and it was first published on : Feb 20, 2002

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a phased approach to implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117, focusing on a robust activity-based costing system to accurately allocate costs and improve financial performance measurement. This approach involves a combination of change management, employee training, and IT management to ensure a smooth transition and successful adoption of the new accounting standards.

2. Background

This case study focuses on Stanford University's decision to implement FASB Statements 116 and 117, which significantly changed the accounting treatment of depreciation and amortization for long-lived assets. The university, facing pressure from its board and external stakeholders, recognized the need to update its accounting procedures and policies to comply with these new standards.

The main protagonists in the case are:

  • The Controller: Responsible for overseeing the university's financial reporting and ensuring compliance with accounting standards.
  • The University's Board of Trustees: Responsible for the university's overall governance and financial oversight.
  • The Faculty: Directly impacted by the new standards as they use university resources for research and teaching.
  • The Staff: Responsible for managing and maintaining the university's physical assets.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

Stanford University's situation presents a classic example of the challenges faced by organizations when implementing new accounting standards. The university needs to:

  • Understand the impact of the new standards on its financial statements: This includes analyzing the impact on depreciation expense, net income, and balance sheet values.
  • Develop a cost allocation system that accurately reflects the use of assets: The traditional allocation methods may not be sufficient under the new standards, requiring a more sophisticated activity-based costing system.
  • Communicate the changes effectively to all stakeholders: This includes educating faculty, staff, and the board about the new standards and their implications.
  • Ensure compliance with the new standards: This requires careful planning, implementation, and ongoing monitoring.

4. Recommendations

  1. Implement an Activity-Based Costing (ABC) System: Stanford should adopt an ABC system to accurately allocate costs based on the actual use of assets. This will provide a more precise understanding of the cost of each activity and improve cost analysis for decision-making.

  2. Develop a Phased Implementation Plan: The implementation should be phased to minimize disruption and ensure a smooth transition. This could involve:

    • Phase 1: Training and education for key personnel on the new standards and the ABC system.
    • Phase 2: Pilot implementation of the ABC system in a specific department or area.
    • Phase 3: Full-scale implementation across the university.
  3. Invest in IT Infrastructure: Stanford should invest in appropriate IT management tools to support the ABC system and streamline data collection and analysis. This will enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the cost allocation process.

  4. Communicate Effectively: Open and transparent communication with all stakeholders is crucial. This includes:

    • Regular updates: Providing regular updates on the implementation progress to the board, faculty, and staff.
    • Training sessions: Conducting training sessions to educate all stakeholders on the new standards and their implications.
    • Feedback mechanisms: Establishing feedback mechanisms to address concerns and ensure buy-in from all stakeholders.
  5. Develop a Strong Internal Control System: Stanford should strengthen its internal controls to ensure compliance with the new standards and prevent potential white-collar crime. This includes establishing clear policies and procedures for asset management, depreciation accounting, and financial reporting.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: Implementing the new standards and adopting an ABC system will enhance Stanford's financial reporting and improve its ability to allocate resources effectively, supporting its mission of academic excellence.

  2. External Customers and Internal Clients: The new standards and the ABC system will provide a more accurate picture of the university's financial performance, which is important for attracting external funding and demonstrating value to internal stakeholders.

  3. Competitors: Stanford's competitors are likely adopting similar accounting standards and cost allocation systems. Implementing these changes will help Stanford remain competitive in the higher education landscape.

  4. Attractiveness ' Quantitative Measures: While the case study does not provide specific financial data, the implementation of the new standards and the ABC system is expected to improve profitability and enhance decision-making by providing more accurate cost information.

6. Conclusion

Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 presents a significant opportunity for Stanford University to improve its financial performance measurement, enhance asset management, and strengthen its corporate governance. By adopting a phased approach, investing in IT management, and prioritizing effective communication, Stanford can successfully navigate this change and achieve its financial reporting goals.

7. Discussion

Alternative approaches to implementation include:

  • Immediate full-scale implementation: This could lead to significant disruption and potential resistance from stakeholders.
  • Outsourcing the implementation: This could be costly and may not provide the same level of control and ownership.

Key risks associated with the recommendations include:

  • Resistance to change: Some stakeholders may resist the implementation of the new standards and the ABC system.
  • Cost of implementation: Implementing the new standards and the ABC system will involve significant costs for training, IT infrastructure, and ongoing maintenance.
  • Data accuracy: Ensuring the accuracy of the data used in the ABC system is crucial for the success of the implementation.

8. Next Steps

  1. Form a project team: Assemble a cross-functional team to oversee the implementation process.
  2. Develop a detailed implementation plan: Outline the specific steps, timelines, and resources required for each phase of the implementation.
  3. Conduct training sessions: Provide comprehensive training to all stakeholders on the new standards, the ABC system, and the implementation process.
  4. Pilot the ABC system: Implement the ABC system in a pilot department or area to test its effectiveness and identify any potential issues.
  5. Monitor progress and make adjustments: Regularly monitor the implementation progress, gather feedback from stakeholders, and make adjustments as needed.

By following these steps, Stanford University can successfully implement FASB Statements 116 and 117, enhancing its financial reporting and achieving its strategic goals.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In 1993, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued two statements--Number 116: Accounting for Contributions Received and Contributions Made and Number 117: Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Organizations. These statements required significant changes to the financial statements issued by nonprofit organizations. This case discusses changes in the context of Stanford University, a private, not-for-profit educational institution. Discusses financial reporting prior to FAS 116 and 117, the objectives of FAS 116 and 117, and their implementation by Stanford. Prepares students for a discussion of nonprofit financial reporting, fund accounting, donor-imposed restrictions, the various stakeholders, and the advantages or disadvantages of financial statements prepared under the provisions of FAS 116 and 117.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117

Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.