Free Lehigh Steel Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Lehigh Steel

"Lehigh Steel" Harvard business case study is written by V.G. Narayanan, Laura E. Donohue. It deals with the challenges in the field of Accounting. The case study is 15 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 26, 1998

At Fern Fort University, we recommend Lehigh Steel implement a comprehensive strategic plan focused on improving operational efficiency, enhancing profitability, and navigating the evolving steel industry landscape. This plan should incorporate elements of cost optimization, strategic asset management, and a shift towards value-added products and services.

2. Background

Lehigh Steel, a leading producer of steel products, faces significant challenges in a highly competitive and cyclical industry. The company is grappling with declining profitability, increasing costs, and a need to adapt to changing market demands. The case study highlights several key issues:

  • Declining profitability: Lehigh's profitability has been declining for several years, driven by rising costs, increased competition, and a shift in customer demand towards value-added products.
  • Operational inefficiencies: The company's manufacturing processes are outdated and inefficient, resulting in high production costs and slow turnaround times.
  • Outdated cost accounting system: Lehigh's cost accounting system is not aligned with its current operations and fails to accurately track costs and identify areas for improvement.
  • Limited investment in innovation: The company has been slow to invest in new technologies and product development, hindering its ability to compete with more innovative rivals.

The main protagonists of the case study are the company's management team, who are tasked with developing a strategy to address these challenges and restore Lehigh's profitability.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

To analyze Lehigh Steel's situation, we can utilize a framework that considers both internal and external factors:

Internal Analysis:

  • Financial Analysis: Lehigh's financial statements reveal a declining trend in profitability, with shrinking margins and increasing debt levels. This indicates a need for cost optimization and improved operational efficiency.
  • Cost Accounting: The existing cost accounting system is inadequate for accurately tracking costs and identifying areas for improvement. Implementing Activity-Based Costing (ABC) would provide a more detailed understanding of cost drivers and allow for more effective cost management.
  • Organizational Structure: The company's organizational structure appears to be siloed, hindering collaboration and innovation. A more cross-functional approach would promote better communication and knowledge sharing.
  • Asset Management: Lehigh's asset base is aging and requires significant investment to improve efficiency and reliability. A comprehensive asset management strategy is needed to optimize utilization, reduce downtime, and extend asset lifecycles.

External Analysis:

  • Industry Dynamics: The steel industry is highly competitive and cyclical, with significant price fluctuations and evolving customer demands. Lehigh needs to adapt to these changes and develop a strategy to differentiate itself from competitors.
  • Market Trends: Customers are increasingly demanding value-added products and services, requiring Lehigh to invest in innovation and product development.
  • Technological Advancements: The industry is witnessing rapid technological advancements, such as automation and digitalization. Lehigh needs to embrace these technologies to improve efficiency and competitiveness.

4. Recommendations

To address the challenges facing Lehigh Steel, we recommend the following:

1. Implement Activity-Based Costing (ABC):

  • When: Immediately.
  • How: Engage a team of cost accounting experts to design and implement an ABC system. This will provide a more accurate understanding of cost drivers and identify areas for cost optimization.
  • Impact: Improved cost management, better informed decision-making, and enhanced profitability.

2. Optimize Manufacturing Processes:

  • When: Over the next 12-18 months.
  • How: Conduct a comprehensive review of manufacturing processes to identify areas for improvement, implement lean manufacturing principles, and invest in automation and technology upgrades.
  • Impact: Reduced production costs, increased efficiency, and improved product quality.

3. Develop a Strategic Asset Management Plan:

  • When: Immediately.
  • How: Conduct a thorough assessment of Lehigh's asset base, develop a comprehensive asset management plan, and invest in maintenance and upgrades to extend asset lifecycles and improve reliability.
  • Impact: Reduced maintenance costs, improved asset utilization, and enhanced operational efficiency.

4. Invest in Innovation and Product Development:

  • When: Over the next 2-3 years.
  • How: Allocate resources for research and development, invest in new technologies, and develop a pipeline of value-added products and services to meet evolving customer demands.
  • Impact: Increased market share, enhanced competitiveness, and improved profitability.

5. Implement a Performance-Based Incentive Program:

  • When: Immediately.
  • How: Develop a performance-based incentive program that aligns employee compensation with company goals and encourages innovation and collaboration.
  • Impact: Improved employee motivation, increased productivity, and enhanced organizational performance.

6. Enhance Corporate Governance and Transparency:

  • When: Immediately.
  • How: Strengthen corporate governance practices, improve transparency in financial reporting, and ensure compliance with relevant accounting standards and regulations.
  • Impact: Increased investor confidence, improved reputation, and enhanced accountability.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations align with Lehigh's core competencies in steel production while focusing on improving efficiency and profitability, consistent with its mission to be a leading provider of steel products.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations address the evolving needs of external customers by focusing on value-added products and services, while also improving the internal operations and working conditions for employees.
  • Competitors: The recommendations aim to enhance Lehigh's competitiveness by improving operational efficiency, investing in innovation, and developing a more strategic approach to asset management.
  • Attractiveness - quantitative measures: The recommendations are expected to yield positive financial returns through cost reduction, improved efficiency, and increased revenue. The implementation of ABC will provide a more accurate assessment of profitability and ROI for future investments.

6. Conclusion

By implementing these recommendations, Lehigh Steel can overcome its current challenges, improve profitability, and position itself for long-term success in the evolving steel industry. The company needs to embrace a proactive approach to cost management, operational efficiency, and innovation to remain competitive and thrive in the years to come.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Mergers and acquisitions: While M&A can provide access to new markets and technologies, it carries significant risks and may not be the most appropriate strategy for Lehigh at this time.
  • Divesting non-core assets: This could free up capital for investment in core businesses, but it could also weaken Lehigh's market position and impact its long-term growth potential.

Key assumptions underlying these recommendations include:

  • The steel industry will continue to evolve, with increasing demand for value-added products and services.
  • Technological advancements will continue to drive efficiency improvements in the steel industry.
  • Lehigh's management team will be committed to implementing the recommended changes and driving organizational change.

8. Next Steps

To implement these recommendations, Lehigh should follow a phased approach:

  • Phase 1 (Immediate): Implement ABC, develop a strategic asset management plan, and establish a performance-based incentive program.
  • Phase 2 (12-18 months): Optimize manufacturing processes and invest in technology upgrades.
  • Phase 3 (2-3 years): Invest in innovation and product development, and expand into new markets.

By adhering to this timeline and prioritizing key milestones, Lehigh can achieve its strategic goals and secure its future in the steel industry.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Lehigh Steel

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

Lehigh Steel is a specialty steel manufacturer that plummeted from record profits to record losses in less than three years, driven by an inability to distinguish between profitable and unprofitable business. The scale and growth of service activities and overhead costs in an increasingly customized product line suggests that activity-based costing (ABC) could unlock the secrets of profitability. However, the high fixed-cost structure suggests that theory of constraints (TOC) could also be relevant. Lehigh must determine how to measure profitability to rationalize its products.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Lehigh Steel

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Lehigh Steel

Lehigh Steel FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Lehigh Steel" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Lehigh Steel ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Lehigh Steel case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Lehigh Steel. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Lehigh Steel" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Lehigh Steel & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Lehigh Steel" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Lehigh Steel solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Lehigh Steel

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Lehigh Steel" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Lehigh Steel"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Lehigh Steel to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Lehigh Steel ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Lehigh Steel case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Lehigh Steel" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Lehigh Steel




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.