Free "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company

""Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company" Harvard business case study is written by Ian D. Gow, Suraj Srinivasan, Neeraj Goyal. It deals with the challenges in the field of Accounting. The case study is 26 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jul 7, 2016

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Dow Chemical Company implement a comprehensive review and restructuring of its executive compensation program, focusing on aligning director compensation with shareholder value creation and long-term sustainability. This review should include a shift towards performance-based compensation with a greater emphasis on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. This will require a combination of changes to the company's accounting procedures and policies, financial analysis, and corporate governance structure.

2. Background

The case study focuses on the controversial executive compensation practices at Dow Chemical Company. The company's 'Golden Leash' program, which provided generous severance packages to retiring directors, attracted significant criticism from shareholders and governance experts. This program was seen as a potential conflict of interest, as it incentivized directors to prioritize their own financial interests over the long-term interests of the company and its shareholders. The main protagonists of the case are the Dow Chemical Company board of directors, shareholders, and the public who expressed concerns about the 'Golden Leash' program.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of corporate governance, financial performance measurement, and stakeholder engagement.

  • Corporate Governance: The 'Golden Leash' program raised concerns about the alignment of director incentives with shareholder interests. The program created a potential conflict of interest where directors might prioritize their own financial security over making difficult decisions that could negatively impact their severance packages.
  • Financial Performance Measurement: The case highlights the challenge of measuring and rewarding long-term value creation. While the 'Golden Leash' program focused on short-term financial metrics, it failed to adequately incentivize directors to focus on sustainable growth and long-term shareholder value.
  • Stakeholder Engagement: The case demonstrates the importance of stakeholder engagement in corporate decision-making. Shareholder activism and public scrutiny forced Dow Chemical to reconsider its compensation practices. This highlights the need for companies to be transparent and accountable to all stakeholders, not just shareholders.

4. Recommendations

To address the concerns raised by the 'Golden Leash' program and promote better corporate governance, Dow Chemical should consider the following recommendations:

  • Restructure Director Compensation: Shift from a fixed-salary model to a performance-based compensation structure. This should include a combination of:
    • Long-term incentive plans: Tie compensation to long-term performance metrics such as sustainable growth, ESG performance, and shareholder value creation.
    • Performance-based bonuses: Reward directors for achieving specific performance targets related to profitability, innovation, and sustainability.
    • Clawback provisions: Allow for the recovery of compensation if directors are found to have engaged in unethical or illegal activities.
  • Strengthen Corporate Governance:
    • Independent Board Committees: Establish independent compensation and governance committees to oversee director compensation and ensure alignment with shareholder interests.
    • Shareholder Engagement: Increase transparency and communication with shareholders regarding compensation practices and performance metrics.
    • ESG Reporting: Implement robust ESG reporting practices to track and disclose the company's environmental, social, and governance performance.
  • Improve Financial Reporting:
    • Activity-Based Costing: Implement activity-based costing to better understand the true costs associated with executive compensation and other corporate activities.
    • Enhanced Financial Statement Disclosures: Provide more detailed disclosures on executive compensation, including the rationale for compensation decisions and the impact on shareholder value.
    • Independent Audit: Engage an independent auditor to review the company's compensation practices and financial reporting.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The recommendations align with Dow Chemical's mission to create sustainable solutions for a better world. By focusing on long-term value creation, ESG performance, and shareholder engagement, the company can demonstrate its commitment to ethical and responsible business practices.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations will enhance stakeholder trust and confidence in Dow Chemical's leadership. By aligning director incentives with shareholder interests, the company can create a more sustainable and profitable business model.
  • Competitors: The recommendations will help Dow Chemical remain competitive by attracting and retaining top talent and fostering a culture of transparency and accountability.
  • Attractiveness - Quantitative Measures: While it is difficult to quantify the impact of these recommendations on financial performance, they are expected to lead to increased shareholder value over the long term. By focusing on sustainable growth, ESG performance, and shareholder engagement, the company can reduce risks and enhance its reputation, ultimately leading to improved profitability.
  • Assumptions: The recommendations assume that Dow Chemical is committed to creating a more sustainable and ethical business model. They also assume that the company is willing to invest in the necessary resources to implement these changes.

6. Conclusion

By implementing these recommendations, Dow Chemical can address the concerns raised by the 'Golden Leash' program and create a more sustainable and ethical business model. This will require a commitment to transparency, accountability, and long-term value creation. By aligning director compensation with shareholder interests and focusing on ESG performance, Dow Chemical can build a stronger reputation and attract investors who value responsible business practices.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Maintaining the status quo: This would likely lead to continued shareholder dissatisfaction and reputational damage.
  • Implementing a 'Golden Handcuff' program: This would incentivize directors to stay with the company for a longer period but could also lead to a lack of innovation and responsiveness to changing market conditions.

The key risks associated with the recommendations include:

  • Resistance from directors: Some directors may resist changes to their compensation packages.
  • Increased costs: Implementing new compensation structures and governance procedures could increase costs.
  • Unintended consequences: The new compensation structure could lead to unintended consequences, such as short-term focus or excessive risk-taking.

8. Next Steps

The following steps should be taken to implement the recommendations:

  • Form a task force: Establish a task force composed of independent directors, executives, and shareholders to review and develop a new compensation program.
  • Conduct a comprehensive review: The task force should conduct a comprehensive review of current compensation practices, including a cost-benefit analysis of the 'Golden Leash' program.
  • Develop a new compensation structure: The task force should develop a new compensation structure that aligns with shareholder interests and promotes long-term value creation.
  • Communicate with stakeholders: The task force should communicate the proposed changes to stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, and the public.
  • Implement the new program: Once the new program is approved, it should be implemented in a timely manner.

By taking these steps, Dow Chemical can create a more sustainable and ethical business model that benefits all stakeholders.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In November 2014, The Dow Chemical Company was faced with the prospect of a proxy battle with prominent hedge fund and activist investor Third Point Management. The activist had criticized Dow's recent performance and advocated that the company split itself to maximize its potential. The activist also proposed two director candidates to join Dow's board. Third Point offered its director nominees what had come to be known as a "golden leash" incentive structure - a significant amount of incentive payment from the investor if the company performed well. Supporters and critics had weighed in on the pros and cons of such incentive schemes for corporate independent directors. Faced with the prospect of a proxy fight, Dow's board had to decide whether to invite the two directors on to the company's board knowing they came with the special payment scheme from the hedge fund.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company

"Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the ""Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study ""Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - ""Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study ""Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - ""Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For ""Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - "Golden Leash" Pay for Directors at The Dow Chemical Company




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.