Free StubHub (A): January 2004 Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - StubHub (A): January 2004

"StubHub (A): January 2004" Harvard business case study is written by Robert A. Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Adam Block. It deals with the challenges in the field of Strategy. The case study is 31 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 15, 2005

This case study solution recommends that StubHub focus on a multi-pronged growth strategy to capitalize on the burgeoning online ticket resale market. This strategy involves:

  • Expanding geographically: Targeting new markets, particularly in Europe and Asia, where the online ticket resale market is still developing.
  • Developing a robust mobile platform: Leveraging the increasing adoption of smartphones and tablets to provide a seamless and convenient user experience for ticket buyers and sellers.
  • Investing in technology and analytics: Utilizing data-driven insights to optimize pricing, inventory management, and customer targeting.
  • Building strategic partnerships: Collaborating with event organizers, venues, and other online platforms to enhance StubHub's reach and attract new customers.
  • Strengthening brand awareness and customer loyalty: Investing in marketing campaigns and customer service initiatives to establish StubHub as the leading online ticket resale platform.

2. Background

StubHub, founded in 2000, was a pioneer in the online ticket resale market. The company faced rapid growth and competition from established players like eBay and Ticketmaster. The case study focuses on StubHub's decision-making in January 2004, as they considered various strategic options to navigate the evolving market landscape.

The main protagonists are Eric Baker, StubHub's CEO, and his team, who are tasked with developing a strategy to achieve sustainable growth and profitability.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

Competitive Analysis:

  • Porter's Five Forces: The ticket resale market was characterized by high competition from established players like eBay and Ticketmaster, as well as numerous smaller competitors. The threat of new entrants was relatively high due to the low barriers to entry. Buyer bargaining power was moderate, while seller bargaining power was low due to the fragmented nature of the market. The threat of substitutes was high, with consumers having various options for obtaining tickets, including directly from venues or through other online platforms.

  • Competitive Advantage: StubHub's initial competitive advantage was its focus on providing a user-friendly platform with a wide selection of tickets and a secure transaction process. However, this advantage was rapidly eroding as competitors adopted similar strategies.

  • SWOT Analysis:

    • Strengths: Strong brand recognition, robust technology platform, efficient customer service, and a large network of sellers.
    • Weaknesses: Limited international presence, dependence on a single revenue stream (ticket sales), and potential vulnerability to legal challenges.
    • Opportunities: Growing demand for online ticket resale, increasing smartphone adoption, and potential for strategic partnerships.
    • Threats: Intense competition, regulatory scrutiny, and potential for fraud and counterfeiting.

Business Model Analysis:

  • Value Chain: StubHub's value chain involved sourcing tickets from sellers, verifying their authenticity, listing them on its platform, facilitating transactions, and providing customer support.
  • Business Model Innovation: StubHub's initial business model focused on a two-sided marketplace connecting buyers and sellers. However, the company needed to innovate to maintain its competitive edge, particularly in the face of increasing competition and evolving customer preferences.

Strategic Options:

  • Market Penetration: Focusing on existing markets by increasing marketing efforts and expanding product offerings. This strategy, while promising short-term gains, could face limitations due to intense competition.
  • Market Development: Entering new geographical markets, particularly in Europe and Asia, where the online ticket resale market was less saturated. This strategy offered significant growth potential but required significant investment and adaptation to local regulations and cultural nuances.
  • Product Development: Introducing new product features and services, such as mobile ticketing, personalized recommendations, and event-related experiences. This strategy could differentiate StubHub from competitors and cater to evolving customer preferences.
  • Diversification: Expanding into related industries, such as event planning or merchandise sales. This strategy could offer diversification benefits but also required significant expertise and resource allocation.

Financial Analysis:

  • Profitability: StubHub's profitability was under pressure due to intense competition and rising operating costs.
  • Growth: The company needed to achieve significant growth to justify its valuation and attract further investment.
  • Financial Sustainability: StubHub needed to ensure its financial sustainability by managing its cash flow and maintaining a strong balance sheet.

4. Recommendations

  • Expand geographically: StubHub should prioritize expanding into new markets, particularly in Europe and Asia, where the online ticket resale market is still developing. This strategy would offer significant growth potential and reduce dependence on the mature North American market.
  • Develop a robust mobile platform: The company should invest in developing a user-friendly mobile platform that provides a seamless and convenient experience for ticket buyers and sellers. This would cater to the increasing adoption of smartphones and tablets and enhance customer engagement.
  • Invest in technology and analytics: StubHub should leverage data-driven insights to optimize pricing, inventory management, and customer targeting. This would allow the company to personalize offers, improve customer experience, and enhance operational efficiency.
  • Build strategic partnerships: The company should explore strategic partnerships with event organizers, venues, and other online platforms to enhance its reach and attract new customers. This would allow StubHub to tap into new customer segments and reduce reliance on organic growth.
  • Strengthen brand awareness and customer loyalty: StubHub should invest in marketing campaigns and customer service initiatives to establish itself as the leading online ticket resale platform. This would involve building a strong brand identity, differentiating itself from competitors, and providing exceptional customer experiences.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations align with StubHub's core competencies in technology and customer service, while also addressing the company's need for growth and diversification. They consider the external factors, such as intense competition and evolving customer preferences, and the internal factors, such as StubHub's financial resources and operational capabilities.

The recommendations are based on quantitative measures, including the potential for increased market share, revenue growth, and profitability. They also consider the potential risks, such as regulatory challenges and the need for significant investment.

6. Conclusion

StubHub faced a critical juncture in its development, requiring a strategic shift to maintain its competitive edge and achieve sustainable growth. By focusing on a multi-pronged growth strategy, including geographic expansion, mobile platform development, technology and analytics investment, strategic partnerships, and brand building, StubHub could position itself as the leading online ticket resale platform globally.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include focusing solely on market penetration or product development, or pursuing a more aggressive diversification strategy. However, these alternatives were deemed less viable due to the intense competition and the need for significant investment.

The key risks associated with the recommended strategy include the potential for regulatory challenges, the need for significant investment, and the risk of execution failure. These risks should be carefully considered and mitigated through effective planning, resource allocation, and ongoing monitoring.

8. Next Steps

StubHub should implement the recommended strategy in a phased approach, starting with the development of a robust mobile platform and the expansion into key European markets. The company should also prioritize building strategic partnerships and investing in technology and analytics.

The implementation should be closely monitored and adjusted based on market feedback and performance metrics. Key milestones include achieving a significant market share in new markets, increasing mobile platform adoption, and demonstrating positive financial performance.

By taking these steps, StubHub can capitalize on the growing online ticket resale market and achieve sustainable growth and profitability.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - StubHub (A): January 2004

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

Shortly after entering business school at Stanford's Graduate School of Business, Eric Baker and Jeff Fluhr decided that they would start a business focused on the secondary market for event tickets. Explores how Baker and Fluhr launched their company, the challenges they faced, and the strategies they pursued. Provides detailed information on company operations as well as on competitors, such as eBay. Positions readers to evaluate the original premise on which the company's growth plans were based--cost-effective customer acquisition through high-profile partners--and develop an alternative strategy.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - StubHub (A): January 2004

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - StubHub (A): January 2004

StubHub (A): January 2004 FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "StubHub (A): January 2004" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " StubHub (A): January 2004 ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The StubHub (A): January 2004 case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for StubHub (A): January 2004. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "StubHub (A): January 2004" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for StubHub (A): January 2004 & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "StubHub (A): January 2004" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my StubHub (A): January 2004 solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - StubHub (A): January 2004

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "StubHub (A): January 2004" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "StubHub (A): January 2004"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study StubHub (A): January 2004 to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for StubHub (A): January 2004 ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the StubHub (A): January 2004 case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "StubHub (A): January 2004" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - StubHub (A): January 2004



Most Read


Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Stategy Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.