Free Google Inc. Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Google Inc.

"Google Inc." Harvard business case study is written by Frank T. Rothaermel. It deals with the challenges in the field of Strategy. The case study is 27 page(s) long and it was first published on : Oct 6, 2015

At Fern Fort University, we recommend Google Inc. adopt a multi-pronged strategic approach to maintain its competitive advantage and navigate the rapidly evolving digital landscape. This involves leveraging its core competencies in technology and analytics, innovation, and global reach to drive sustainable growth across various business segments. This strategy will be underpinned by a strong focus on corporate social responsibility, digital transformation, and strategic foresight to ensure long-term success.

2. Background

The case study focuses on Google Inc. in 2008, a period marked by rapid growth and expansion. The company had established itself as a dominant force in search, advertising, and email, with a diverse portfolio of products and services. However, Google faced increasing competition from established players and emerging startups, while navigating the challenges of globalization and regulatory scrutiny.

The main protagonists of the case study are:

  • Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google, who is grappling with the company's rapid growth and the need for strategic direction.
  • Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Google's founders, who are pushing for innovation and maintaining Google's entrepreneurial spirit.
  • The Google executive team, who are responsible for managing different business units and navigating the complexities of a global organization.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

Industry Analysis: Using Porter's Five Forces, we can analyze the competitive landscape:

  • Threat of New Entrants: High due to low barriers to entry in the internet space, especially with the rise of mobile platforms.
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers: Moderate, as users have alternatives but are increasingly reliant on Google services.
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Low, as Google has access to a wide range of suppliers and can leverage its scale.
  • Threat of Substitute Products: High, as various services and platforms can substitute for Google's offerings.
  • Competitive Rivalry: Intense, with established players like Microsoft and Yahoo!, as well as emerging competitors like Facebook and Amazon.

SWOT Analysis:

Strengths:

  • Strong brand recognition and reputation
  • Dominant market share in search and advertising
  • Strong financial position
  • Innovative culture and talented workforce
  • Extensive data and analytics capabilities
  • Global reach and infrastructure

Weaknesses:

  • Dependence on advertising revenue
  • Privacy concerns and regulatory scrutiny
  • Competition from established and emerging players
  • Challenges in monetizing new products and services
  • Potential for complacency and loss of focus

Opportunities:

  • Growth in mobile and emerging markets
  • Expansion into new business areas like cloud computing and hardware
  • Leveraging data and analytics for personalized services and targeted advertising
  • Developing innovative technologies like AI and machine learning
  • Strategic partnerships and acquisitions

Threats:

  • Increased competition from established and emerging players
  • Regulatory changes and privacy concerns
  • Economic downturn and advertising spending cuts
  • Technological disruptions and shifts in user behavior
  • Cybersecurity threats and data breaches

Value Chain Analysis:

Google's value chain is characterized by its strong focus on innovation, technology, and data. Its core competencies include:

  • Research and Development (R&D): Continuous investment in cutting-edge technologies, including AI, machine learning, and cloud computing.
  • Product Development: Creation of innovative products and services, such as Google Search, Gmail, Android, and Google Maps.
  • Marketing and Sales: Effective marketing campaigns and distribution channels to reach a global audience.
  • Data Analytics: Leveraging vast amounts of user data to improve services, personalize experiences, and target advertising.

Business Model Innovation:

Google's business model is based on freemium, offering core services like search and email for free while generating revenue through targeted advertising. This model has been highly successful, but Google needs to diversify its revenue streams and explore new business models to ensure long-term sustainability.

Corporate Governance:

Google's corporate governance structure is characterized by a strong emphasis on innovation and long-term growth. However, its focus on shareholder value may sometimes conflict with its social responsibility goals.

Mergers and Acquisitions:

Google has a history of strategic acquisitions, such as YouTube, Android, and DoubleClick, to expand its reach and capabilities. However, it needs to carefully evaluate the potential risks and benefits of acquisitions to ensure they align with its overall strategy.

Strategic Planning:

Google needs to develop a comprehensive strategic plan that outlines its vision, mission, and goals for the future. This plan should be flexible and adaptable to changing market conditions and technological advancements.

Market Segmentation:

Google targets a wide range of users across different demographics and geographic locations. It needs to refine its market segmentation strategies to better understand the needs and preferences of different user groups.

Blue Ocean Strategy:

Google has successfully created blue oceans in search and advertising, but it needs to continue exploring new markets and opportunities to create sustainable competitive advantage.

Disruptive Innovation:

Google has been a disruptor in various industries, but it needs to be mindful of potential disruptions from emerging technologies and competitors.

Balanced Scorecard:

Google can use the Balanced Scorecard framework to track its performance across financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth perspectives.

Core Competencies:

Google's core competencies include technology, innovation, data analytics, and global reach. It needs to leverage these competencies to create new products and services and expand into new markets.

Diversification:

Google needs to diversify its revenue streams and explore new business areas to reduce its dependence on advertising.

Vertical Integration:

Google has integrated vertically in some areas, such as hardware development with its Pixel phones. It needs to consider the potential benefits and risks of further vertical integration.

Horizontal Integration:

Google has expanded horizontally through acquisitions and partnerships. It needs to carefully evaluate the potential benefits and risks of further horizontal integration.

Strategic Alliances:

Google has formed strategic alliances with other companies to expand its reach and capabilities. It needs to continue to develop strategic alliances that align with its overall strategy.

Outsourcing:

Google outsources some of its operations, such as customer support. It needs to ensure that outsourcing decisions are made strategically and do not compromise its core competencies.

Globalization Strategies:

Google has a strong global presence and needs to continue to adapt its strategies to different cultural and regulatory environments.

Product Differentiation:

Google differentiates its products and services through innovation, features, and user experience. It needs to continue to differentiate its offerings to stay ahead of the competition.

Cost Leadership:

Google has a cost advantage in some areas, such as data storage and infrastructure. It needs to leverage its cost advantages to maintain competitiveness.

Market Penetration:

Google needs to continue to penetrate existing markets by attracting new users and increasing usage among existing users.

Market Development:

Google needs to explore new markets, such as emerging markets and specific industry verticals.

Product Development:

Google needs to continue to develop new products and services that meet evolving user needs and market trends.

Resource-Based View:

Google's resources, such as its brand, technology, data, and talent, provide it with a competitive advantage. It needs to manage these resources effectively to sustain its competitive edge.

Dynamic Capabilities:

Google needs to develop dynamic capabilities, such as its ability to adapt to changing market conditions and technological advancements, to remain competitive.

Scenario Planning:

Google should engage in scenario planning to anticipate potential future scenarios and develop contingency plans.

Stakeholder Analysis:

Google needs to consider the interests of its various stakeholders, including users, employees, investors, and regulators, in its decision-making.

Strategic Positioning:

Google needs to maintain its strategic positioning as a leader in innovation, technology, and digital services.

Business Ecosystem:

Google operates within a complex business ecosystem that includes other companies, users, and regulators. It needs to manage its relationships within this ecosystem effectively.

Game Theory in Strategy:

Google can use game theory to analyze competitive interactions and develop strategies that anticipate the actions of its rivals.

Strategic Leadership:

Google's leadership team needs to provide clear vision, direction, and support for its strategic initiatives.

Change Management:

Google needs to effectively manage change as it adapts to evolving market conditions and technological advancements.

Organizational Culture:

Google's culture of innovation and experimentation is a key asset. It needs to maintain this culture while adapting to the challenges of growth and globalization.

Strategic Implementation:

Google needs to develop effective processes and systems to implement its strategic plans.

Benchmarking:

Google should benchmark its performance against its competitors to identify areas for improvement.

Strategic Control:

Google needs to establish mechanisms for monitoring and controlling the implementation of its strategic initiatives.

PESTEL Analysis:

  • Political: Regulatory changes, government policies, and geopolitical risks.
  • Economic: Economic downturns, currency fluctuations, and global economic conditions.
  • Social: Changing demographics, consumer preferences, and social trends.
  • Technological: Advancements in AI, machine learning, and other technologies.
  • Environmental: Sustainability concerns, climate change, and resource scarcity.
  • Legal: Privacy regulations, antitrust laws, and intellectual property rights.

Industry Lifecycle:

The internet industry is in a mature stage, but it continues to evolve rapidly. Google needs to adapt its strategies to the changing dynamics of the industry.

Strategic Groups:

Google is a member of a strategic group of leading technology companies, such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Facebook. It needs to compete effectively within this group.

Value Proposition:

Google's value proposition is based on providing users with free, convenient, and innovative digital services. It needs to continue to enhance its value proposition to meet evolving user needs.

Business Portfolio Analysis:

Google can use a business portfolio analysis, such as the BCG matrix or Ansoff matrix, to assess the performance and potential of its various business units.

BCG Matrix:

  • Stars: Google Search, Gmail, Android
  • Cash Cows: Google Ads, YouTube
  • Question Marks: Google Cloud, Google Assistant
  • Dogs: Google+

Ansoff Matrix:

  • Market Penetration: Increasing usage of existing products and services.
  • Market Development: Entering new markets and geographic regions.
  • Product Development: Introducing new products and services.
  • Diversification: Entering new markets with new products and services.

Strategic Intent:

Google's strategic intent is to be a leader in innovation, technology, and digital services. It needs to translate this intent into specific goals and actions.

Sustainable Competitive Advantage:

Google's sustainable competitive advantage is based on its strong brand, technology, data, and talent. It needs to invest in these areas to maintain its competitive edge.

Strategic Flexibility:

Google needs to maintain strategic flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions and technological advancements.

Corporate Social Responsibility:

Google has a commitment to corporate social responsibility, including environmental sustainability, data privacy, and ethical AI development. It needs to continue to integrate these principles into its business practices.

Digital Transformation Strategy:

Google is already a leader in digital transformation, but it needs to continue to invest in technologies and processes that enhance its digital capabilities.

Strategic Foresight:

Google needs to develop a strong capability for strategic foresight to anticipate future trends and disruptions.

4. Recommendations

1. Diversify Revenue Streams: Google needs to reduce its dependence on advertising revenue by exploring new business models and expanding into new markets. This could include:

  • Subscription models: Offering premium versions of existing services or new subscription-based services.
  • Cloud computing: Expanding its Google Cloud Platform to capture a larger share of the growing cloud computing market.
  • Hardware: Expanding its hardware offerings beyond Pixel phones to include smart home devices, wearables, and other connected devices.
  • Enterprise software: Developing enterprise software solutions for businesses, leveraging its data and analytics capabilities.

2. Invest in Innovation and Emerging Technologies: Google needs to continue to invest in research and development to maintain its leadership in innovation. This includes:

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI): Investing in AI research and development to enhance its products and services, such as Google Search, Google Assistant, and Google Cloud.
  • Machine Learning (ML): Leveraging ML to personalize user experiences, automate tasks, and improve decision-making.
  • Quantum Computing: Exploring the potential of quantum computing to solve complex problems and develop new technologies.
  • Biotechnology: Exploring applications of biotechnology in healthcare, agriculture, and other industries.

3. Strengthen Corporate Social Responsibility: Google needs to demonstrate its commitment to corporate social responsibility by taking concrete actions to address environmental, social, and ethical concerns. This includes:

  • Environmental Sustainability: Reducing its carbon footprint, investing in renewable energy, and promoting sustainable practices.
  • Data Privacy: Protecting user data and ensuring transparency in its data collection and usage practices.
  • Ethical AI Development: Developing AI systems that are fair, unbiased, and responsible.
  • Community Engagement: Investing in local communities and supporting social causes.

4. Enhance Global Strategy: Google needs to adapt its strategies to different cultural and regulatory environments to succeed in global markets. This includes:

  • Localization: Tailoring its products and services to the specific needs and preferences of users in different countries.
  • Cultural Sensitivity: Understanding and respecting cultural differences in its marketing and communication efforts.
  • Compliance: Adhering to local laws and regulations, including data privacy laws and antitrust regulations.
  • Strategic Partnerships: Forming strategic alliances with local companies to expand its reach and capabilities.

5. Foster Strategic Foresight: Google needs to develop a strong capability for strategic foresight to anticipate future trends and disruptions. This includes:

  • Scenario Planning: Developing scenarios for potential future events and developing contingency plans.
  • Trend Analysis: Monitoring emerging trends in technology, consumer behavior, and the global economy.
  • Competitive Intelligence: Gathering information about competitors and potential disruptors.
  • Strategic Thinking: Encouraging a culture of strategic thinking throughout the organization.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a comprehensive analysis of Google's internal and external environment, including its core competencies, competitive landscape, and evolving market trends. They are consistent with Google's mission to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.

1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The recommendations leverage Google's core competencies in technology, innovation, data analytics, and global reach to drive growth and create value for users. They are also consistent with Google's mission to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.

2. External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations consider the needs and preferences of Google's external customers, including users, advertisers, and partners. They also take into account the needs of Google's internal clients, including employees and investors.

3. Competitors: The recommendations address the competitive threats posed by established and emerging players, including Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, and other technology companies.

4. Attractiveness ' Quantitative Measures: The recommendations are based on a qualitative assessment of Google's strategic options. While specific quantitative measures are not provided, the recommendations are expected to drive long-term growth and profitability for Google.

5. Assumptions: The recommendations are based on the assumption that Google will continue to invest in innovation and technology, maintain its commitment to corporate social responsibility, and adapt its strategies to changing market conditions.

6. Conclusion

Google Inc. is at a crossroads, facing both opportunities and challenges in the rapidly evolving digital landscape. By adopting a multi-pronged strategic approach that leverages its core competencies, embraces innovation, and prioritizes corporate social responsibility, Google can maintain its competitive advantage and achieve long-term success.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Focusing solely on advertising revenue: This would be a risky strategy, as Google's dependence on advertising revenue could make it vulnerable to economic downturns and changes in user behavior.
  • Acquiring a large number of companies: This could be a costly and risky strategy, as not all acquisitions are successful.
  • Ignoring emerging technologies: This would be a dangerous strategy, as Google could be overtaken by competitors who are investing in new technologies.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Economic downturn: A significant economic downturn could negatively impact Google's advertising revenue and its ability to invest in new initiatives.
  • Regulatory changes: Changes in privacy regulations or antitrust laws could impact Google's business model and its ability to operate in certain markets.
  • Technological disruptions: New technologies could disrupt Google's existing businesses and create new competitive threats.
  • Failure to innovate: If Google fails to continue innovating, it could lose its competitive edge and market share.

Options Grid:

OptionAdvantagesDisadvantagesRisk
Diversify revenue streamsReduced dependence on advertising revenue, new growth opportunitiesIncreased complexity, potential for cannibalizationEconomic downturn, regulatory changes
Invest in emerging technologiesMaintain leadership in innovation, new growth opportunitiesHigh cost, uncertainty of successTechnological disruptions, failure to innovate
Strengthen corporate social responsibilityEnhanced reputation, improved stakeholder relationshipsIncreased costs, potential for conflict with shareholder interestsNegative publicity, regulatory scrutiny
Enhance global strategyIncreased market reach, access to new talent and resourcesIncreased complexity, cultural and regulatory challengesPolitical instability, economic downturns
Foster strategic foresightImproved ability to anticipate future trends and disruptionsIncreased complexity, potential for over-analysisFailure to identify key trends, inability to adapt to change

8. Next Steps

Timeline:

  • Year 1: Develop a comprehensive strategic plan that outlines Google's vision, mission, and goals for the future.
  • Year 2: Implement initiatives to diversify revenue streams, including launching new products and services, expanding into new markets, and exploring new business models.
  • Year 3: Invest heavily in research and development, particularly in AI, machine learning, and quantum computing.
  • Year 4: Strengthen Google's commitment to corporate social responsibility by taking concrete actions to address environmental, social, and ethical concerns.
  • Year 5: Enhance Google's global strategy by adapting its products, services, and marketing efforts to different cultural and regulatory environments.

Key Milestones:

  • Develop a strategic plan: This should be a comprehensive document that outlines Google's vision, mission, goals, and strategies for the future.
  • Launch new products and services: Google should introduce new products and services that diversify its revenue streams and expand its reach.
  • Enter new markets: Google should explore new markets, including emerging markets and specific industry verticals.
  • Invest in R&D: Google should increase its investment in research and development, particularly in AI, machine learning, and quantum computing.
  • Develop a corporate social responsibility strategy: This should outline Google's commitment to environmental sustainability, data privacy, and ethical AI development.
  • Adapt global strategies: Google should tailor its products, services, and marketing efforts to different cultural and regulatory environments.
  • Develop a strategic foresight capability: This should involve scenario planning, trend analysis, competitive intelligence, and strategic thinking.

By taking these steps, Google can position itself for long-term success in the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Google Inc.

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

The case outlines the growth of Google: from its beginning at Stanford, to its achieved milestones (becoming profitable, becoming an IPO) and finally to its success attracting competition and inciting government regulation-this, along with technology change, are the current challenges its CEO Larry Page must now face. With Android, Google has successfully shifted from search functionality on personal computers to search functionality on mobile devices and developed an ecosystem of services to attract users. However, Google continues to depend heavily on advertising (which makes up 90 percent of its revenues). Further, as R&D investments are increasing at competing firms, R&D productivity is simultaneously decreasing at Google. The shifting sands of competition and regulation cannot be ignored, and Google faces the prospect of needing both business as well as corporate strategy to better guide its activities.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Google Inc.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Google Inc.

Google Inc. FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Google Inc." case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Google Inc. ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Google Inc. case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Google Inc.. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Google Inc." at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Google Inc. & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Google Inc." at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Google Inc. solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Google Inc.

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Google Inc." at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Google Inc."?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Google Inc. to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Google Inc. ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Google Inc. case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Google Inc." case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - Google Inc.




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Stategy Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.