Free American Airlines in 2011 Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - American Airlines in 2011

"American Airlines in 2011" Harvard business case study is written by Willy Shih. It deals with the challenges in the field of Strategy. The case study is 28 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jul 28, 2014

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a strategic transformation for American Airlines focused on innovation, digital transformation, and customer-centricity, leveraging technology and analytics to achieve sustainable growth and regain its position as a leading airline. This strategy will involve a combination of operational improvements, strategic alliances, and strategic acquisitions to enhance its competitive advantage and value proposition in a rapidly evolving industry.

2. Background

The case study focuses on American Airlines in 2011, struggling to recover from bankruptcy and facing intense competition from low-cost carriers and legacy airlines. The company's core competencies in network size and customer loyalty were challenged by the rise of disruptive innovation in the airline industry. The case highlights the need for a strategic shift to adapt to changing customer needs and market dynamics.

The main protagonists are:

  • Tom Horton: CEO of American Airlines, tasked with leading the company's turnaround.
  • The Board of Directors: Responsible for overseeing the company's strategic direction.
  • Competitors: Southwest Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, and other low-cost carriers.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

We can analyze American Airlines' situation using several frameworks:

Porter's Five Forces:

  • Threat of New Entrants: High, due to low barriers to entry for low-cost carriers.
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Moderate, with fuel prices being a significant cost factor.
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers: High, with customers having many choices and price sensitivity.
  • Threat of Substitute Products: High, with alternative modes of transportation like rail and car.
  • Competitive Rivalry: Intense, with price wars and frequent mergers and acquisitions.

Ansoff Matrix:

  • Market Penetration: Focus on increasing market share in existing markets through pricing strategies and loyalty programs.
  • Market Development: Expand into new geographic markets with existing products, leveraging its international network.
  • Product Development: Introduce new products and services, like premium economy seating and personalized travel experiences.
  • Diversification: Explore new business models, such as partnerships with travel agencies and hospitality companies.

BCG Matrix:

  • Stars: High growth, high market share routes, requiring investment for continued growth.
  • Cash Cows: Low growth, high market share routes, generating cash flow for investment.
  • Question Marks: High growth, low market share routes, requiring careful evaluation for potential.
  • Dogs: Low growth, low market share routes, potentially requiring divestment.

Financial Analysis:

  • High debt levels: Resulting from bankruptcy and restructuring, impacting financial flexibility.
  • Operating costs: High, requiring cost optimization and efficiency improvements.
  • Revenue generation: Focus on increasing revenue per passenger mile and maximizing load factors.

4. Recommendations

American Airlines should implement a multi-pronged strategy to address its challenges and achieve sustainable growth:

  1. Innovation and Digital Transformation:
    • Invest in technology and analytics: Implement AI and machine learning to optimize flight schedules, pricing, and customer service.
    • Develop a robust digital platform: Enhance online booking, mobile app functionality, and personalized travel experiences.
    • Embrace digital marketing: Utilize social media, targeted advertising, and data-driven marketing strategies to reach new customers.
  2. Customer-Centricity and Value Creation:
    • Improve customer service: Focus on creating a seamless and personalized travel experience, addressing customer pain points.
    • Enhance loyalty programs: Offer tiered rewards, personalized offers, and exclusive benefits to retain existing customers.
    • Develop a clear value proposition: Differentiate itself from competitors by offering unique features and benefits, like premium amenities and personalized service.
  3. Strategic Alliances and Acquisitions:
    • Form partnerships with other airlines: Expand its network and reach new markets through code-sharing agreements and joint ventures.
    • Acquire smaller airlines: Gain access to new routes, expand its network, and improve its competitive position.
  4. Operational Efficiency and Cost Optimization:
    • Streamline operations: Implement lean manufacturing processes, optimize flight schedules, and reduce operational costs.
    • Negotiate favorable fuel contracts: Secure competitive fuel prices through long-term contracts and hedging strategies.
    • Improve employee engagement: Foster a culture of innovation and efficiency through employee training and empowerment.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations focus on leveraging American Airlines' existing strengths in network size and customer loyalty while embracing innovation and digital transformation to enhance its value proposition.
  2. External customers and internal clients: The recommendations prioritize customer satisfaction and employee engagement, ensuring a positive experience for all stakeholders.
  3. Competitors: The recommendations aim to differentiate American Airlines from competitors by offering a superior customer experience, leveraging technology and analytics, and expanding its network through strategic alliances and acquisitions.
  4. Attractiveness ' quantitative measures if applicable: The recommendations are expected to improve financial performance through increased revenue, reduced costs, and improved efficiency, ultimately leading to higher profitability.

6. Conclusion

By embracing innovation, digital transformation, and customer-centricity, American Airlines can regain its position as a leading airline in a rapidly evolving industry. This strategy will require a commitment to continuous improvement, strategic partnerships, and a focus on creating value for customers and shareholders.

7. Discussion

Alternative strategies include:

  • Focusing solely on cost reduction: This could lead to a decline in service quality and customer satisfaction.
  • Merging with another major airline: This could lead to regulatory challenges and potential antitrust issues.
  • Divesting non-core assets: This could weaken its competitive position and reduce its network size.

Key risks and assumptions:

  • Technological advancements: The rapid pace of technological change could require constant adaptation and investment.
  • Regulatory environment: Changes in government policy and regulation could impact the airline industry.
  • Economic conditions: Fluctuations in the economy could affect travel demand and profitability.

8. Next Steps

American Airlines should:

  • Develop a detailed implementation plan: Define specific goals, timelines, and resource allocation for each recommendation.
  • Establish key performance indicators (KPIs): Track progress and measure the success of the strategy.
  • Communicate the strategy effectively: Engage employees, customers, and stakeholders to ensure alignment and support.
  • Continuously monitor and adapt: Stay agile and responsive to changing market conditions and customer needs.

By implementing these recommendations, American Airlines can navigate the challenges of the airline industry and emerge as a stronger, more competitive, and customer-centric organization.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - American Airlines in 2011

Case Description

The American Airlines in 2011 case was developed to provide a setting for the comparative analysis of two very different business models in the U.S. domestic airline industry-the network carrier and the low cost carrier (LCC). These models offer very different value propositions. Firms allocate resources into distinctively different processes, and they earn returns using parallel but different profit models. Yet while most scholars view the LCC model as disruptive, the two different models have been able to co-exist for over forty years, albeit with substantial evolution. By unpacking how one of the major network carriers was able to evolve its model successfully for such a long time before industry structural changes necessitated a radical overhaul, the cases seek to give students insights into how the different business models were established, how competitive forces have driven their evolution, and the importance of constantly evolving and tuning a firm's model.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - American Airlines in 2011

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - American Airlines in 2011

American Airlines in 2011 FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "American Airlines in 2011" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " American Airlines in 2011 ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The American Airlines in 2011 case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for American Airlines in 2011. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "American Airlines in 2011" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for American Airlines in 2011 & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "American Airlines in 2011" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my American Airlines in 2011 solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - American Airlines in 2011

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "American Airlines in 2011" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "American Airlines in 2011"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study American Airlines in 2011 to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for American Airlines in 2011 ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the American Airlines in 2011 case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "American Airlines in 2011" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - American Airlines in 2011




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Stategy Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.