Free Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project

"Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project" Harvard business case study is written by Deborah Milstein, Susan L. Madden, Teresa Chahine. It deals with the challenges in the field of Social Enterprise. The case study is 31 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 2, 2018

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a multi-pronged, collaborative approach to tackling youth substance abuse on Staten Island, utilizing a collective impact framework to maximize effectiveness and sustainability. This approach will leverage cross-sector partnerships between nonprofit organizations, government agencies, schools, businesses, and community members to create a comprehensive and impactful solution.

2. Background

The case study focuses on the alarming rise of youth substance abuse on Staten Island, highlighting the complex interplay of factors contributing to this issue. The main protagonists are the Staten Island Partnership for Youth (SIPY), a coalition of concerned organizations, and The Staten Island Foundation, a philanthropic organization seeking to address the problem. The case study explores the challenges faced by SIPY in coordinating efforts, securing funding, and achieving meaningful impact.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study highlights the need for a holistic approach that addresses the root causes of youth substance abuse. This requires a systems-level understanding of the problem, considering factors such as:

  • Social determinants of health: Poverty, lack of access to quality education, and social isolation contribute to vulnerability to substance abuse.
  • Lack of access to resources: Limited availability of mental health services, addiction treatment programs, and support groups exacerbates the problem.
  • Community factors: Negative social norms, lack of positive role models, and exposure to drug use within families and communities contribute to the cycle of addiction.

Strategic Framework:

To address these complex challenges, we propose utilizing the Collective Impact Framework as a guiding principle. This framework emphasizes the need for:

  • Common agenda: All stakeholders agree on a shared vision, goals, and strategies.
  • Shared measurement system: Standardized data collection and analysis to track progress and measure impact.
  • Mutually reinforcing activities: Different organizations leverage their strengths and resources to complement each other's efforts.
  • Backbone support organization: SIPY acts as a coordinating body to facilitate communication, collaboration, and resource allocation.
  • Continuous communication and learning: Regular meetings, data sharing, and feedback loops are essential for adapting strategies and improving effectiveness.

4. Recommendations

Phase 1: Building the Foundation (Year 1)

  1. Develop a comprehensive community needs assessment: Conduct a thorough assessment to identify key risk factors, existing resources, and gaps in services.
  2. Establish a strong backbone organization: Strengthen SIPY's capacity by recruiting experienced staff, developing robust governance structures, and securing adequate funding.
  3. Develop a shared vision and strategic plan: Foster consensus among stakeholders on a common agenda, measurable goals, and key strategies.
  4. Create a data-driven measurement system: Establish standardized metrics to track progress, measure impact, and demonstrate the effectiveness of interventions.
  5. Initiate pilot programs: Launch small-scale, targeted interventions in specific areas to test different approaches and gather valuable data.

Phase 2: Implementing the Strategy (Year 2-3)

  1. Expand and diversify funding sources: Seek funding from various sources, including government grants, private foundations, corporate social responsibility programs, and impact investors.
  2. Develop innovative interventions: Implement evidence-based programs that address the root causes of substance abuse, such as:
    • Early intervention programs: Provide prevention education, life skills training, and positive youth development opportunities.
    • Mental health services: Increase access to affordable and culturally competent mental health care, including individual therapy, group counseling, and support groups.
    • Addiction treatment programs: Provide comprehensive treatment options, including detoxification, medication-assisted treatment, and behavioral therapy.
    • Community-based support: Create safe and supportive environments through community outreach, peer support networks, and family therapy.
  3. Build strong partnerships: Foster collaboration between schools, healthcare providers, law enforcement, community organizations, and businesses to create a network of support for youth.
  4. Promote public awareness and stigma reduction: Conduct public education campaigns to raise awareness about substance abuse, reduce stigma, and encourage help-seeking behavior.

Phase 3: Sustainability and Expansion (Year 4 onwards)

  1. Evaluate program effectiveness: Regularly assess the impact of interventions and make data-driven adjustments to optimize outcomes.
  2. Scale up successful programs: Expand successful interventions to reach a wider audience and address the needs of all communities on Staten Island.
  3. Develop sustainable funding models: Explore innovative funding mechanisms, such as social impact bonds, to ensure long-term financial sustainability.
  4. Advocate for policy changes: Work with government agencies to implement policies that support prevention, treatment, and recovery.
  5. Foster community ownership: Empower community members to take ownership of the initiative and become active participants in the solution.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a thorough analysis of the case study, considering the following factors:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations align with the mission of SIPY and other stakeholders to address youth substance abuse and promote the well-being of Staten Island's youth.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations prioritize the needs of youth at risk, their families, and the broader community.
  • Competitors: The recommendations consider the existing landscape of substance abuse prevention and treatment programs, aiming to complement and enhance existing efforts.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are based on evidence-based interventions and innovative approaches that have demonstrated effectiveness in other communities.
  • Assumptions: The recommendations assume that stakeholders are committed to collaboration, data-driven decision-making, and continuous improvement.

6. Conclusion

Tackling youth substance abuse on Staten Island requires a comprehensive, collaborative, and sustainable approach. By embracing the Collective Impact Framework, leveraging cross-sector partnerships, and implementing evidence-based interventions, Staten Island can create a healthier and brighter future for its youth.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Individual organization-based approaches: While valuable, these are less effective in addressing complex social problems like substance abuse.
  • Top-down, government-led initiatives: These can be bureaucratic and lack flexibility to adapt to local needs.

Risks:

  • Lack of stakeholder commitment: Insufficient buy-in from key stakeholders can hinder progress.
  • Funding challenges: Securing adequate and sustainable funding is crucial for long-term success.
  • Data collection and analysis limitations: Challenges in collecting accurate and reliable data can impact program evaluation and improvement.

Key Assumptions:

  • Collaboration: Stakeholders are willing to work together and share resources.
  • Data-driven decision-making: All stakeholders prioritize evidence-based approaches and use data to guide decisions.
  • Community engagement: Community members are actively involved in the initiative and contribute to its success.

8. Next Steps

  • Form a steering committee: Establish a diverse group of stakeholders to oversee the implementation of the recommendations.
  • Develop a detailed implementation plan: Outline specific activities, timelines, and resource requirements for each phase of the project.
  • Secure initial funding: Identify potential funding sources and initiate applications for grants and other financial support.
  • Conduct a pilot program: Launch a small-scale intervention to test the effectiveness of key strategies and gather valuable data.
  • Monitor progress and make adjustments: Regularly track progress, evaluate outcomes, and make data-driven adjustments to the implementation plan.

By taking these steps, Staten Island can build a strong foundation for tackling youth substance abuse and creating a healthier and more vibrant community for all.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Social Entreprise case study - Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

This case focuses on the challenges of keeping a collective impact program-the Tackling Youth Substance Abuse (TYSA) program on Staten Island-focused and effective over time, a problem faced by many collaborative community-based efforts. The TYSA program was founded in 2012 as a cross-sector collaborative response to the alarming rates of substance abuse on Staten Island, using a collective impact framework. In the four years since its founding, TYSA had accomplished a great deal. But by October 2016, when the case opens, many of the original members of TYSA's steering committee-most of whom had been high-level decision-makers in their organizations-were delegating their spots to mid-level staff who were not empowered to make organizational decisions. In addition, TYSA's early successes against prescription drug abuse were increasingly overshadowed by a growing opioid problem on the Island and by a continuing culture of alcohol abuse by underage teens. A subtler challenge was that, in the Staten Island community, TYSA was over-identified with Adrienne Abbate, TYSA's Project Director, herself; how could TYSA shift the community's perception to demonstrate the program's value beyond its leader? Project Director Adrienne Abbate decided to pull TYSA's executive leadership and staff together to discuss strategies to reinvigorate the program and to sustain the momentum they had fought so hard to create.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Social Entreprise case study - Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project

Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Social Entreprise case study - Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.