Free Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway

"Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway" Harvard business case study is written by Kirsten Lundberg, John D. Donahue. It deals with the challenges in the field of Social Enterprise. The case study is 18 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jun 5, 2006

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a multifaceted approach to address the governance challenges of the Rose Kennedy Greenway. This approach emphasizes the importance of social entrepreneurship, strategic partnerships, and impact investing to ensure the long-term sustainability and success of this vital public space.

2. Background

The Rose Kennedy Greenway, a 1.5-mile linear park in downtown Boston, faces significant challenges in its governance structure. The case highlights the complex web of stakeholders, including the Greenway Conservancy, the City of Boston, and various private and public partners. The Conservancy, responsible for the Greenway's daily operations and maintenance, struggles with limited funding and competing priorities. This situation creates a governance vacuum, hindering the Greenway's ability to effectively manage its resources and achieve its full potential as a vibrant public space.

The main protagonists in this case are:

  • The Greenway Conservancy: A non-profit organization tasked with managing the Greenway, facing resource constraints and competing priorities.
  • The City of Boston: The primary owner and stakeholder of the Greenway, responsible for providing some funding and oversight.
  • Various private and public partners: Organizations and individuals with vested interests in the Greenway's success, but with varying levels of commitment and engagement.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study can be analyzed through the lens of stakeholder theory, which emphasizes the importance of balancing the interests of all stakeholders in a decision-making process. The Greenway Conservancy, as a non-profit organization, needs to navigate the competing interests of its stakeholders, including:

  • The City of Boston: Seeking a vibrant public space that enhances the city's image and economic development.
  • Private donors: Expecting a return on their investment in terms of social impact and brand recognition.
  • Community residents: Seeking access to green space, recreational opportunities, and cultural events.
  • Environmental advocates: Emphasizing the ecological sustainability of the Greenway.

The lack of a clear governance structure has led to:

  • Resource constraints: The Conservancy struggles to secure adequate funding to meet its operational needs and ambitious programming goals.
  • Competing priorities: Different stakeholders have differing visions for the Greenway, leading to conflicting priorities and a lack of strategic direction.
  • Limited accountability: The absence of a clear governance framework makes it difficult to hold stakeholders accountable for their actions and commitments.

4. Recommendations

4.1. Establish a Hybrid Governance Model:

  • Create a new entity: A hybrid organization, combining the strengths of a non-profit and a for-profit entity, could be established to manage the Greenway. This entity could leverage the expertise of the Conservancy while attracting private investment and generating revenue through innovative business models.
  • Develop a shared governance structure: This structure would involve representation from key stakeholders, including the City of Boston, private donors, community residents, and environmental advocates. This ensures a more inclusive and accountable decision-making process.

4.2. Embrace Social Entrepreneurship and Impact Investing:

  • Develop sustainable business models: The Greenway Conservancy should explore innovative business models that generate revenue while aligning with its mission. This could include partnerships with local businesses, social enterprises, and impact investors.
  • Leverage impact investing: The Greenway can attract impact investors by demonstrating its social and environmental impact through rigorous social impact measurement and reporting. This would provide access to additional funding and expertise.

4.3. Foster Strategic Partnerships:

  • Build cross-sector partnerships: The Conservancy should actively seek partnerships with local businesses, universities, non-profit organizations, and government agencies to leverage their resources and expertise.
  • Develop a collaborative fundraising strategy: This strategy would involve pooling resources from various partners, including private donors, foundations, and government grants.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core competencies and consistency with mission: The hybrid governance model and social entrepreneurship approach align with the Conservancy's mission to create a vibrant public space that benefits the community and the environment.
  2. External customers and internal clients: The recommendations address the needs of all stakeholders, including the City of Boston, private donors, community residents, and environmental advocates.
  3. Competitors: The recommendations emphasize innovation and collaboration to differentiate the Greenway from other public spaces and attract resources.
  4. Attractiveness: The hybrid governance model and impact investing strategy are attractive to potential investors and partners due to their potential for financial and social returns.

6. Conclusion

By embracing social entrepreneurship, strategic partnerships, and impact investing, the Rose Kennedy Greenway can overcome its governance challenges and achieve its full potential as a vibrant public space. This approach will ensure the Greenway's long-term sustainability, financial security, and social impact.

7. Discussion

Alternatives not selected:

  • Maintaining the current governance structure: This option would likely lead to continued resource constraints and competing priorities, hindering the Greenway's progress.
  • Privatization: While this option could provide financial stability, it could also lead to a loss of public access and a focus on commercial interests over community needs.

Risks and key assumptions:

  • Risk: The hybrid governance model may be complex to implement and require significant effort to ensure effective collaboration among stakeholders.
  • Assumption: Impact investors will be willing to invest in the Greenway based on its social and environmental impact.

8. Next Steps

  • Form a task force: This task force would be responsible for developing a detailed implementation plan for the recommended governance model.
  • Conduct feasibility studies: These studies would assess the financial viability and potential impact of the proposed business models and impact investing strategies.
  • Engage stakeholders: The task force would engage all stakeholders in a transparent and collaborative process to ensure buy-in and support for the proposed changes.

By taking these steps, the Rose Kennedy Greenway can transform its governance structure and become a model for sustainable and impactful public spaces.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Social Entreprise case study - Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

This case study examines-through the lens of governance structure-the evolution of the Central Artery (or "Big Dig") in Boston, a public works project of historic proportion which had the potential to create a green oasis of parks in the heart of downtown. It tells the story of the struggle over who would eventually control and finance the maintenance of the Rose F. Kennedy Greenway-the name given to land created when an elevated highway was dismantled and the roadway rebuilt underground. Those who wanted control, but not necessarily financial responsibility, included the mayor of Boston, the governor, the legislature and the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority (a quasi-governmental body). Issues of park design entangled with governance questions, leading to a stalemate of nearly 15 years. But in 2004, Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) pushed for a resolution so that the Greenway could be dedicated in connection with Boston's role as host of the July Democratic Party presidential convention. Over the years of debate, various models of governance for the Greenway were discussed and dismissed. Some of them involved private sector partners; some did not. Students will have the opportunity to compare and contrast the proposed governance models, judging them on their merits as well as on their political suitability. They will gain insight into the differences in operations and public accountability among a public agency, a foundation, a conservancy or a nonprofit trust. HKS Case Number 1839.0

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Social Entreprise case study - Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway

Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Social Entreprise case study - Too Many Parents? Part A: Governance of Boston's Rose Kennedy Greenway



Most Read


Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.