Free Obsidian: Product or Platform? Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Obsidian: Product or Platform?

"Obsidian: Product or Platform?" Harvard business case study is written by Karim R. Lakhani, Kerry Herman, Julia Kelley. It deals with the challenges in the field of Operations Management. The case study is 7 page(s) long and it was first published on : Sep 16, 2019

At Fern Fort University, we recommend Obsidian pursue a platform strategy focused on becoming a comprehensive ecosystem for 3D printing enthusiasts and professionals. This involves expanding beyond its current product offerings to encompass a broader range of services, tools, and resources, ultimately positioning Obsidian as the central hub for the 3D printing community. This approach leverages Obsidian's existing strengths in product development, manufacturing, and customer service while capitalizing on the burgeoning 3D printing market's growth potential.

2. Background

Obsidian is a successful 3D printing company known for its high-quality, innovative products. However, the company faces increasing competition from established players like MakerBot and emerging startups. The case study focuses on Obsidian's CEO, Michael, who must decide whether to continue focusing on product development or pivot towards a platform strategy.

The main protagonists are Michael, the CEO, and his team, including the Chief Technology Officer (CTO), the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO), and the Head of Operations. They grapple with the challenges of navigating a rapidly evolving market and determining the best path for Obsidian's future.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

Porter's Five Forces Analysis:

  • Threat of New Entrants: High - The 3D printing market is attracting new players due to its rapid growth and low barriers to entry.
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers: Moderate - Customers have options for different 3D printers and materials, but Obsidian's high-quality products offer a competitive advantage.
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Low - The supply chain for 3D printing components is relatively mature, with numerous suppliers offering competitive pricing.
  • Threat of Substitute Products: Moderate - Other technologies, like CNC machining, can be used for certain applications, but 3D printing offers unique advantages in prototyping and customization.
  • Competitive Rivalry: High - The market is highly competitive, with established players like MakerBot and emerging startups vying for market share.

SWOT Analysis:

Strengths:

  • Strong brand reputation for quality and innovation.
  • Experienced team with expertise in product development and manufacturing.
  • Strong customer service and community engagement.

Weaknesses:

  • Limited product portfolio compared to competitors.
  • Dependence on a single product category (3D printers).
  • Potential for market share erosion due to competition.

Opportunities:

  • Growing demand for 3D printing in various industries.
  • Expanding applications for 3D printing beyond prototyping.
  • Potential for platform-based business model to capture value across the ecosystem.

Threats:

  • Increasing competition from established players and startups.
  • Potential for technological disruption from new 3D printing technologies.
  • Fluctuations in raw material costs and supply chain disruptions.

Key Insights:

  • The 3D printing market is rapidly evolving, requiring constant innovation and adaptation.
  • A product-centric approach may not be sustainable in the long term due to intense competition.
  • A platform strategy can provide Obsidian with a competitive advantage by creating a valuable ecosystem for its customers.

4. Recommendations

  1. Develop a Comprehensive Platform Strategy: Obsidian should focus on building a platform that connects users, designers, manufacturers, and developers within the 3D printing ecosystem. This platform should offer a range of services, including:

    • Online marketplace: Facilitating the sale of 3D printed goods, designs, and materials.
    • Design and prototyping tools: Providing software and resources for creating and sharing 3D models.
    • Community forum: Fostering collaboration and knowledge sharing among 3D printing enthusiasts.
    • Educational resources: Offering online courses, workshops, and tutorials on 3D printing.
    • Manufacturing services: Providing access to 3D printing facilities and expertise for small-scale production runs.
    • Data analytics: Collecting and analyzing data on user behavior and market trends to inform product development and platform improvements.
  2. Invest in Technology and Analytics: Obsidian should invest in developing robust information systems and data analytics capabilities to support the platform's functionality and provide valuable insights. This includes:

    • Cloud-based infrastructure: Ensuring scalability and accessibility for platform users.
    • Data management and analytics tools: Collecting, processing, and analyzing user data to optimize platform performance and personalize user experiences.
    • Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML): Leveraging AI and ML to automate tasks, personalize recommendations, and improve the platform's overall functionality.
  3. Expand Product Portfolio: Obsidian should continue developing innovative 3D printers while expanding its product portfolio to include complementary products and services. This could include:

    • 3D printing materials: Offering a wider range of materials for different applications.
    • Software and accessories: Developing software for 3D printing workflows and offering accessories like filament spools and cleaning tools.
    • 3D printing services: Providing on-demand 3D printing services for prototyping and small-scale production.
  4. Strengthen Customer Relationships: Obsidian should prioritize building strong relationships with its customers by:

    • Providing excellent customer support: Offering responsive and helpful support channels.
    • Engaging with the community: Actively participating in online forums and events to foster a sense of community among users.
    • Collecting customer feedback: Regularly soliciting feedback from customers to improve platform features and services.
  5. Strategic Partnerships: Obsidian should explore strategic partnerships with other companies in the 3D printing ecosystem to expand its reach and access new markets. This could include:

    • Collaboration with software developers: Integrating with popular 3D modeling software.
    • Partnerships with educational institutions: Offering discounted products and services to schools and universities.
    • Joint ventures with manufacturers: Expanding into new markets by collaborating with companies specializing in specific applications.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core competencies and consistency with mission: Obsidian's core competencies in product development, manufacturing, and customer service are well-suited for a platform strategy. This strategy aligns with the company's mission to empower individuals and businesses through 3D printing.
  2. External customers and internal clients: The platform strategy addresses the needs of both external customers (3D printing enthusiasts and professionals) and internal clients (Obsidian's employees) by providing a comprehensive ecosystem for innovation, collaboration, and growth.
  3. Competitors: The platform strategy differentiates Obsidian from its competitors by creating a unique value proposition based on a comprehensive ecosystem rather than just a single product.
  4. Attractiveness: The platform strategy offers significant potential for growth and profitability. The 3D printing market is expected to continue growing rapidly, and Obsidian's platform can capture a significant share of this market by providing a comprehensive solution for users.

6. Conclusion

By transitioning from a product-centric approach to a platform-based strategy, Obsidian can establish itself as a leading player in the rapidly evolving 3D printing market. This strategy leverages the company's existing strengths, addresses the competitive landscape, and positions Obsidian for long-term success.

7. Discussion

Alternatives Not Selected:

  • Continuing with a product-centric approach: This would likely lead to continued competition and potential market share erosion.
  • Acquiring a competitor: This could be a risky and expensive option, requiring significant capital investment and integration challenges.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Technology disruption: New technologies could emerge that disrupt the 3D printing market, requiring Obsidian to adapt its platform strategy.
  • Competition: The platform strategy could attract new competitors, requiring Obsidian to continuously innovate and differentiate its offerings.
  • Customer adoption: The success of the platform strategy depends on customer adoption and engagement.

Options Grid:

OptionAdvantagesDisadvantages
Platform StrategyGrowth potential, competitive advantage, ecosystem developmentTechnology investment, competition, customer adoption
Product-Centric ApproachFocus on core competencies, established marketLimited growth potential, intense competition, market share erosion
AcquisitionRapid market expansion, access to new technologiesHigh cost, integration challenges, potential for disruption

8. Next Steps

  1. Develop a detailed platform strategy: Define the platform's features, services, and target audience.
  2. Invest in technology and analytics: Build a robust information system and data analytics infrastructure.
  3. Expand product portfolio: Develop new products and services to complement the platform.
  4. Strengthen customer relationships: Implement strategies for customer support, community engagement, and feedback collection.
  5. Explore strategic partnerships: Identify potential partners for collaboration and market expansion.

Timeline:

  • Phase 1 (Year 1): Develop platform strategy, invest in technology, launch core platform features.
  • Phase 2 (Year 2): Expand product portfolio, build community, explore strategic partnerships.
  • Phase 3 (Year 3): Optimize platform performance, expand market reach, monitor industry trends.

By taking these steps, Obsidian can successfully transition to a platform-based business model and position itself for long-term success in the dynamic 3D printing market.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Operations Management case study - Obsidian: Product or Platform?

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

FFU**description

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Obsidian: Product or Platform?

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Operations Management case study - Obsidian: Product or Platform?

Obsidian: Product or Platform? FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Obsidian: Product or Platform?" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Obsidian: Product or Platform? ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Obsidian: Product or Platform? case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Obsidian: Product or Platform?. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Obsidian: Product or Platform?" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Obsidian: Product or Platform? & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Obsidian: Product or Platform?" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Obsidian: Product or Platform? solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Obsidian: Product or Platform?

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Obsidian: Product or Platform?" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Obsidian: Product or Platform?"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Obsidian: Product or Platform? to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Obsidian: Product or Platform? ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Obsidian: Product or Platform? case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Obsidian: Product or Platform?" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Operations Management case study - Obsidian: Product or Platform?




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.