Free Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A) Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)

"Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)" Harvard business case study is written by Jesper Sorensen, Sara Gaviser Leslie. It deals with the challenges in the field of Organizational Behavior. The case study is 21 page(s) long and it was first published on : Oct 7, 2010

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Siemens implement a comprehensive organizational restructuring plan focused on driving performance and responsibility through a decentralized, matrix structure with a strong emphasis on employee empowerment, cross-functional collaboration, and leadership development. This new structure will foster innovation, agility, and accountability while promoting a culture of diversity and inclusion.

2. Background

The case study focuses on Siemens' struggle to adapt to a rapidly changing global market characterized by increasing competition and technological disruption. The company faces challenges in its traditional hierarchical structure, which hinders innovation, slows decision-making, and fosters a siloed approach.

The main protagonists are Peter L'scher, the CEO of Siemens, who is tasked with leading the company's transformation, and the various executives within the organization who are grappling with the need for change.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of organizational structure and design, leadership styles, change management, and organizational culture.

Organizational Structure and Design:

  • Current Structure: Siemens' current hierarchical structure, while providing stability, is rigid and hinders agility. The siloed approach creates communication breakdowns and slows down decision-making.
  • Proposed Structure: A decentralized, matrix structure, where employees report to both functional and project managers, offers a more flexible and responsive approach. This structure fosters cross-functional collaboration, promotes employee empowerment, and encourages innovation.

Leadership Styles:

  • Traditional Leadership: The case highlights a traditional leadership style, where power is concentrated at the top, and decision-making is centralized. This style, while effective in stable environments, is not conducive to rapid innovation and adaptation.
  • Transformational Leadership: Siemens needs to embrace a transformational leadership style that emphasizes vision, inspiration, and empowerment. Leaders need to create a culture of shared responsibility, open communication, and continuous learning.

Change Management:

  • Resistance to Change: Siemens faces significant resistance to change due to the existing organizational culture and the fear of job security.
  • Effective Change Management: Siemens needs to implement a comprehensive change management strategy that addresses the concerns of employees, communicates the rationale for change clearly, and provides adequate training and support.

Organizational Culture:

  • Current Culture: The case suggests a culture that is hierarchical, risk-averse, and resistant to change.
  • Desired Culture: Siemens needs to cultivate a culture of innovation, accountability, and collaboration. This requires promoting diversity and inclusion, fostering open communication, and rewarding risk-taking.

4. Recommendations

To address the challenges facing Siemens, we recommend the following:

1. Implement a Decentralized Matrix Structure:

  • Objective: To enhance flexibility, agility, and responsiveness.
  • Action: Create a matrix structure with clear reporting lines and responsibilities. Empower teams to make decisions and take ownership of projects.
  • Timeline: Phase the implementation over 12-18 months, starting with pilot projects in strategic areas.

2. Foster a Culture of Innovation and Collaboration:

  • Objective: To encourage creativity, risk-taking, and cross-functional collaboration.
  • Action: Implement initiatives such as hackathons, innovation labs, and cross-functional project teams. Encourage open communication and knowledge sharing.
  • Timeline: Start immediately with pilot programs and gradually expand to all departments.

3. Develop Transformational Leaders:

  • Objective: To cultivate leaders who inspire, empower, and drive change.
  • Action: Implement leadership development programs that focus on emotional intelligence, communication skills, and change management. Promote leaders who demonstrate a transformational leadership style.
  • Timeline: Develop a comprehensive leadership development program and start implementing it within 6 months.

4. Embrace Diversity and Inclusion:

  • Objective: To create a more inclusive and diverse workforce that reflects the global market.
  • Action: Implement diversity recruitment strategies, promote equal opportunities, and create a culture of respect and inclusivity.
  • Timeline: Start immediately with a comprehensive diversity and inclusion strategy.

5. Implement a Robust Change Management Strategy:

  • Objective: To minimize resistance and maximize employee buy-in during the transition.
  • Action: Communicate the rationale for change clearly, provide training and support, and address employee concerns.
  • Timeline: Start immediately with a communication plan and ongoing feedback mechanisms.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The recommendations align with Siemens' core competencies in technology and engineering while supporting its mission of creating sustainable and innovative solutions.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The proposed changes will enhance Siemens' ability to meet the needs of its external customers and internal stakeholders through greater responsiveness, innovation, and efficiency.
  • Competitors: The recommendations will help Siemens stay ahead of its competitors by fostering agility, innovation, and a more customer-centric approach.
  • Attractiveness: The proposed changes are expected to lead to increased profitability, improved employee engagement, and a stronger company reputation.

6. Conclusion

By implementing these recommendations, Siemens can transform itself into a more agile, innovative, and customer-centric organization. The new structure will empower employees, foster collaboration, and drive performance while promoting a culture of diversity and inclusion. This transformation will enable Siemens to navigate the challenges of the global market and achieve sustainable success.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Maintaining the Status Quo: This option would likely lead to further decline as Siemens struggles to keep up with the changing market.
  • Partial Decentralization: This option might offer some benefits but would not fully address the need for agility and innovation.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Resistance to Change: There is a risk of significant resistance to change, which could hinder the implementation process.
  • Cultural Shift: Shifting the organizational culture from hierarchical to collaborative will take time and effort.
  • Leadership Development: Developing transformational leaders will require a significant investment in training and development.

8. Next Steps

  • Develop a detailed implementation plan: This plan should outline specific timelines, milestones, and responsibilities for each recommendation.
  • Communicate the change strategy to employees: Regular communication and feedback mechanisms are crucial to build trust and ensure buy-in.
  • Monitor progress and make adjustments: Regularly assess the effectiveness of the changes and make adjustments as needed.

By taking these steps, Siemens can successfully implement its transformation and emerge as a stronger, more competitive, and sustainable organization.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

Peter Löscher became CEO of Siemens in July, 2007. It was one of the most turbulent times in the company's history as the company was reeling from a compliance scandal involving hundreds of millions of Euros in suspected bribes, and had to pay billions of Euros in fines and fees to clear its name. Further, the company's operating groups were underperforming their peers in terms of profitability, and had been for some time. Adding to the challenges, Löscher was the first outsider to run Siemens since the company's founding in 1847. After his arrival, Löscher moved quickly to assess the organization, a global, multi-line technology and engineering firm with over 475,000 employees and over €66,487 million of revenue and €3,345 million of net income. Klaus Kleinfeld, the previous CEO, had improved company performance, driven the company to become more globally focused, and sold off underperforming and non-core assets. However, his tenure was cut short by the bribery scandal. When Löscher arrived, he felt the company was overly complex, individuals lacked accountability and significant tension existed between headquarters and the regions. Löscher took advantage of the crisis to reorganize the company from 10 operating groups to 3 sectors, introduce regional clusters to enable smaller markets to focus on sales, establish the right of way of the global business, simplify financial reporting, and enhance the sales effort to market verticals. In addition to the changes that Löscher made to the company structure, he transformed employees' attitudes and renewed the entrepreneurial and innovative spirit among managers in the organization.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)

Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A) FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A) ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A) case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A). Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A) & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A) solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A) to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A) ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A) case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Siemens: Building a Structure to Drive Performance and Responsibility (A)




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.