Free LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong

"LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong" Harvard business case study is written by Erika H. James, Jenny Mead. It deals with the challenges in the field of Organizational Behavior. The case study is 6 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 22, 2013

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that LIVESTRONG Foundation implement a multifaceted strategy to address the challenges posed by the Lance Armstrong scandal. This strategy will focus on rebuilding trust, strengthening organizational culture, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the foundation's mission.

2. Background

The LIVESTRONG Foundation was founded in 1997 by Lance Armstrong, a renowned cyclist who overcame testicular cancer. The foundation aimed to provide support and resources to cancer patients and survivors. However, in 2012, Armstrong confessed to doping throughout his cycling career, leading to a public outcry and a significant loss of trust in the foundation.

The case study focuses on the challenges faced by the foundation in the aftermath of the scandal. It highlights the impact on the organization's reputation, fundraising efforts, and internal morale.

The main protagonists are:

  • Lance Armstrong: The founder of the foundation and the central figure in the doping scandal.
  • The LIVESTRONG Foundation Board: Responsible for overseeing the foundation's operations and navigating the crisis.
  • The LIVESTRONG Foundation Staff: Impacted by the scandal and tasked with rebuilding trust and continuing the foundation's mission.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study presents a complex situation requiring careful analysis. We can apply several frameworks to understand the challenges and develop effective solutions:

Organizational Behavior: The scandal significantly impacted the foundation's organizational culture, leading to decreased employee morale, trust, and commitment. This requires a focus on rebuilding a positive and ethical work environment.

Leadership: The foundation's leadership faced the challenge of leading through crisis, managing conflict, and rebuilding trust with stakeholders. This requires strong leadership qualities like transparency, empathy, and strategic vision.

Change Management: The foundation needed to implement significant changes to its organizational structure, communication strategies, and fundraising practices. This requires a well-defined change management process to minimize resistance and ensure successful implementation.

Corporate Social Responsibility: The scandal raised questions about the foundation's commitment to ethical practices and its ability to fulfill its mission. Rebuilding trust requires a renewed focus on ethical behavior and transparency.

Marketing and Communication: The foundation needed to develop a comprehensive communication strategy to address the scandal, rebuild trust, and re-engage with stakeholders. This strategy should focus on transparency, authenticity, and demonstrating the foundation's positive impact.

Fundraising: The scandal significantly impacted the foundation's fundraising efforts. Rebuilding donor confidence requires a clear strategy that emphasizes transparency, accountability, and the impact of the foundation's programs.

4. Recommendations

To address the challenges and ensure the long-term success of the LIVESTRONG Foundation, we recommend the following:

1. Rebuilding Trust and Transparency:

  • Conduct a thorough internal investigation: To address any remaining concerns and demonstrate transparency.
  • Publish the findings publicly: To ensure accountability and rebuild trust with stakeholders.
  • Establish a new leadership team: With a proven track record of ethical leadership and commitment to the foundation's mission.
  • Implement a robust ethics program: To ensure ethical behavior and prevent future scandals.
  • Develop a clear and transparent communication strategy: To proactively engage with stakeholders and address concerns.

2. Strengthening Organizational Culture:

  • Focus on employee engagement and empowerment: To foster a sense of ownership and commitment to the foundation's mission.
  • Promote a culture of open communication and feedback: To encourage dialogue and address concerns.
  • Develop a robust training program: To educate employees on ethical behavior, conflict resolution, and diversity and inclusion.
  • Recognize and reward employees: For their commitment to the foundation's mission and ethical values.

3. Re-engaging Stakeholders:

  • Develop a targeted outreach strategy: To reconnect with donors, partners, and beneficiaries.
  • Highlight the impact of the foundation's programs: To demonstrate the positive impact of the foundation's work.
  • Engage with influencers and advocates: To spread the word about the foundation's mission and rebuild trust.
  • Develop a comprehensive communication plan: To address the scandal and communicate the foundation's commitment to ethical practices.

4. Diversifying Funding Sources:

  • Explore new fundraising avenues: To reduce reliance on individual donors and diversify the foundation's funding portfolio.
  • Develop partnerships with corporations and foundations: To secure long-term funding and support.
  • Increase public awareness of the foundation's mission: To attract new donors and supporters.

5. Redefining the Foundation's Mission:

  • Refocus the foundation's mission: To ensure it aligns with the current needs of cancer patients and survivors.
  • Develop new programs and initiatives: To address emerging challenges and opportunities in the cancer community.
  • Expand the foundation's reach: To serve a wider range of individuals and communities.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations consider the following factors:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations focus on rebuilding trust, strengthening organizational culture, and ensuring the foundation's long-term sustainability.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations address the needs of donors, beneficiaries, partners, and employees.
  • Competitors: The recommendations focus on differentiating the foundation from other cancer charities and highlighting its unique value proposition.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are designed to be cost-effective and provide a high return on investment.

6. Conclusion

The LIVESTRONG Foundation faces significant challenges in the aftermath of the Lance Armstrong scandal. By implementing these recommendations, the foundation can rebuild trust, strengthen its organizational culture, and ensure the long-term sustainability of its mission.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Shutting down the foundation: This would be a drastic measure and would not address the needs of cancer patients and survivors.
  • Ignoring the scandal: This would damage the foundation's reputation further and erode trust with stakeholders.

The key assumptions underlying these recommendations include:

  • The foundation is committed to ethical practices and transparency.
  • The foundation has the resources and commitment to implement these recommendations.
  • Stakeholders are willing to give the foundation a second chance.

8. Next Steps

To implement these recommendations, the foundation should:

  • Establish a task force: To oversee the implementation of the recommendations.
  • Develop a timeline and budget: For each recommendation.
  • Communicate regularly with stakeholders: To keep them informed of progress.
  • Monitor and evaluate the impact: Of the recommendations on the foundation's performance.

By taking these steps, the LIVESTRONG Foundation can overcome the challenges of the Lance Armstrong scandal and continue to make a positive impact on the lives of cancer patients and survivors.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In early 2013, the ongoing controversy involving cyclist Lance Armstrong's use of performance-enhancing drugs was taking its toll on the nonprofit LIVESTRONG Foundation, which Armstrong himself had founded years before after being diagnosed with cancer. Armstrong had already been stripped of his titles, including six Tour de France medals, and was about to appear on a television interview where he presumably would admit to doping. LIVESTRONG CEO Doug Ulman and his leadership team had to figure out how to meet the various challenges that now confronted the organization: a continued drain on the organization's time and energy, bad publicity, media scrutiny, and the erosion of financial support. The organization had helped hundreds of thousands of cancer survivors over the years and Ulman and the others wanted to make sure that LIVESTRONG remained strong and viable.

πŸŽ“ Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! πŸŒŸπŸ“š #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong

LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

πŸŽ“ Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! πŸŒŸπŸ“š #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - LIVESTRONG: Cycling Around Lance Armstrong



Most Read


Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.