Free iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience

"iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience" Harvard business case study is written by Nidhi S. Bisht, Jyotsna Bhatnagar. It deals with the challenges in the field of Organizational Behavior. The case study is 9 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jan 18, 2017

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a multi-pronged approach to address the toxic talent and organizational resilience issues faced by iGATE Corporation. This approach focuses on fostering a positive and inclusive organizational culture, improving leadership effectiveness, and implementing robust talent management practices. By addressing these key areas, iGATE can create a more resilient and sustainable organization that attracts and retains top talent, while mitigating the risks associated with toxic behavior and fostering an environment of trust and collaboration.

2. Background

iGATE Corporation, a global technology solutions provider, faced significant challenges related to toxic talent and organizational resilience. The case study highlights a culture of fear, intimidation, and favoritism, leading to low morale, high turnover, and a decline in employee engagement. These issues were exacerbated by a lack of effective leadership, inadequate talent management practices, and a failure to address workplace discrimination.

The main protagonists in the case study are the employees, who experience the negative impact of the toxic environment, and the leadership team, who are responsible for creating and maintaining a positive and productive workplace.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study can be analyzed through the lens of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management frameworks.

Organizational Behavior:

  • Leadership Styles: The case study highlights ineffective leadership styles, particularly the use of autocratic and coercive approaches. This fosters a culture of fear and intimidation, hindering employee motivation and creativity.
  • Organizational Culture: The negative culture at iGATE is characterized by a lack of trust, transparency, and open communication. This creates a breeding ground for toxic behavior and hinders organizational resilience.
  • Group Dynamics: The case study highlights the impact of toxic individuals on team dynamics, leading to conflict, low morale, and decreased productivity.
  • Motivation Theories: The lack of employee motivation and engagement can be attributed to the absence of intrinsic motivators such as autonomy, mastery, and purpose. Instead, the focus on extrinsic rewards and punishments creates a demotivating environment.
  • Change Management: The case study highlights the challenges associated with implementing change in an organization with a deeply ingrained toxic culture. Resistance to change and a lack of trust in leadership can hinder successful transformation efforts.

Human Resource Management:

  • Hiring and Recruitment: The case study suggests a lack of robust hiring practices, leading to the recruitment of individuals who may not be a good fit for the company culture.
  • Talent Management: The case study highlights the absence of effective talent management practices, including performance management, career development, and succession planning. This contributes to the lack of employee engagement and retention.
  • Diversity and Inclusion: The case study highlights the prevalence of workplace discrimination, which undermines the company's commitment to diversity and inclusion. This can create a hostile environment for marginalized groups and hinder the organization's ability to attract and retain top talent.
  • Employee Performance Management: The case study suggests a lack of effective performance management systems, leading to a lack of accountability and a culture of mediocrity.
  • Compensation and Benefits: The case study highlights the importance of competitive compensation and benefits packages in attracting and retaining top talent. However, it also emphasizes that these factors alone are not sufficient to address the deeper issues of toxic culture and lack of employee engagement.

4. Recommendations

To address the challenges faced by iGATE, the following recommendations are proposed:

1. Cultivating a Positive and Inclusive Organizational Culture:

  • Leadership Development: Implement a comprehensive leadership development program focused on developing transformational leadership skills, including empathy, communication, and collaboration. This program should emphasize ethical leadership, diversity and inclusion, and creating a culture of trust and respect.
  • Organizational Culture Change: Implement a strategic culture change initiative focused on fostering a positive and inclusive work environment. This initiative should involve all employees and stakeholders and focus on promoting open communication, transparency, and a sense of belonging.
  • Diversity and Inclusion Training: Provide mandatory training on diversity and inclusion to all employees, focusing on awareness, sensitivity, and creating a respectful and inclusive workplace.

2. Strengthening Talent Management Practices:

  • Robust Hiring Process: Develop a robust hiring process that emphasizes cultural fit, skills assessment, and behavioral interviews to ensure that new hires align with the company's values and culture.
  • Performance Management System: Implement a performance management system that focuses on development, feedback, and recognition, rather than solely on performance evaluation. This system should be transparent, fair, and aligned with the company's goals and values.
  • Career Development and Succession Planning: Develop a comprehensive career development program that provides employees with opportunities for growth and advancement. Implement a robust succession planning process to ensure that the organization has a pipeline of qualified candidates to fill key leadership roles.

3. Addressing Toxic Behavior:

  • Clear Code of Conduct: Develop a clear and comprehensive code of conduct that outlines acceptable and unacceptable behavior in the workplace. This code should be communicated effectively to all employees and enforced consistently.
  • Zero-Tolerance Policy: Implement a zero-tolerance policy for toxic behavior, including harassment, bullying, and discrimination. This policy should include clear reporting mechanisms and a fair and transparent investigation process.
  • Employee Support: Provide employees with access to resources and support systems to address issues of workplace discrimination and harassment. This can include confidential counseling, legal assistance, and a safe space to report concerns.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations align with iGATE's core competencies in technology solutions and its mission to provide innovative and high-quality services. By fostering a positive and inclusive culture, the company can attract and retain top talent, which is essential for its long-term success.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations are designed to improve employee engagement and satisfaction, which will ultimately lead to better customer service and increased client satisfaction.
  • Competitors: The recommendations are informed by best practices in the technology industry and are designed to help iGATE stay competitive by attracting and retaining top talent.
  • Attractiveness ' quantitative measures if applicable: The recommendations are expected to lead to improvements in key performance indicators such as employee retention, productivity, and customer satisfaction. These improvements will contribute to increased profitability and long-term sustainability.

6. Conclusion

By implementing these recommendations, iGATE can transform its toxic culture and build a more resilient and sustainable organization. This transformation will require a commitment from leadership, a willingness to embrace change, and a focus on creating a positive and inclusive work environment. By addressing the root causes of the toxic talent and organizational resilience issues, iGATE can create a workplace where employees feel valued, respected, and motivated to contribute their best.

7. Discussion

While the recommendations presented are comprehensive, there are other alternative approaches that could be considered. For example, iGATE could consider:

  • Outsourcing some functions: This could help to reduce the impact of toxic behavior on specific departments or teams.
  • Implementing a more decentralized organizational structure: This could empower employees and give them more autonomy, potentially reducing the impact of toxic leadership.
  • Hiring an external consultant to conduct a cultural audit: This could provide a more objective assessment of the company's culture and identify specific areas for improvement.

These alternatives have their own risks and assumptions. For example, outsourcing could lead to a loss of control over certain functions, while a more decentralized structure could lead to a lack of coordination and accountability. The decision of which approach to take will depend on iGATE's specific circumstances and priorities.

8. Next Steps

To implement these recommendations effectively, iGATE should take the following steps:

  • Form a task force: This task force should be composed of representatives from different departments and levels of the organization, and should be responsible for developing and implementing the recommendations.
  • Develop a communication plan: This plan should outline how the recommendations will be communicated to employees, stakeholders, and the public.
  • Set clear timelines and milestones: This will ensure that the recommendations are implemented in a timely and efficient manner.

By taking these steps, iGATE can begin to address the challenges it faces and create a more positive and productive workplace for all.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience

Case Description

In May 2013, iGATE Corporation suffered a major blow after terminating its president and chief executive officer, Phaneesh Murthy, as a result of allegations of sexual harassment. Murthy had previously been forced to step down from Infosys Limited for similar reasons. After Murthy's unceremonious exit, iGATE struggled to fill its top leadership position. Finally, in September 2013, a new chief executive took over and outlined a plan of action that differed completely from his predecessor's strategy. However, the company, which had been poised to achieve big ambitions, had lost momentum and appeared directionless. Had iGATE made a mistake by hiring Murthy as its top executive just 18 months after he had been fired from Infosys? Why did iGATE not conduct due diligence on its talent acquisition and management, especially for the critical position of chief executive officer? How could other organizations turn around a position of vulnerability to become resilient?

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience

iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - iGATE Corporation: Toxic Talent and Organizational Resilience



Most Read


Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.