Free Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign

"Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign" Harvard business case study is written by Ashish Nanda, Kimberly A. Haddad. It deals with the challenges in the field of Negotiation. The case study is 18 page(s) long and it was first published on : Dec 6, 2000

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Arthur Levitt, the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), proceed with his campaign to reform the accounting profession. This campaign should focus on enhancing auditor independence, promoting transparency and accountability, and strengthening corporate governance. While the campaign will face resistance from the accounting industry, the potential benefits for investors, the economy, and the public trust outweigh the challenges.

2. Background

This case study focuses on Arthur Levitt's campaign to reform the accounting profession in the late 1990s. The campaign was driven by concerns about the growing number of accounting scandals, fueled by a lack of auditor independence and a desire to manipulate financial statements for personal gain. The case highlights the conflict between the SEC, representing the interests of investors and the public, and the accounting industry, which sought to protect its own interests.

The main protagonists are Arthur Levitt, the SEC Chairman, and the accounting industry, represented by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and individual accounting firms.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case can be analyzed through the lens of Corporate Governance, Business and Government Relations, and Game Theory.

Corporate Governance: The case highlights the critical role of corporate governance in ensuring ethical and transparent business practices. The lack of independent audits and the prevalence of accounting manipulations demonstrate the breakdown of corporate governance mechanisms.

Business and Government Relations: The case showcases the complex relationship between the government, represented by the SEC, and the business sector, represented by the accounting industry. The SEC's role in regulating the accounting profession is crucial for maintaining investor confidence and protecting the public interest.

Game Theory: The case can be viewed as a game of strategy between the SEC and the accounting industry. Both parties have their own objectives and strategies, and the outcome depends on their actions and reactions. The SEC seeks to promote transparency and accountability, while the accounting industry seeks to protect its interests and maintain its reputation.

Key Issues:

  • Auditor Independence: The case highlights the lack of auditor independence, as accounting firms were often beholden to their clients, leading to conflicts of interest.
  • Accounting Manipulation: The case exposes the prevalence of accounting manipulation, where companies used creative accounting practices to inflate their profits and mislead investors.
  • Corporate Governance Failures: The case reveals the failures of corporate governance mechanisms, including weak internal controls and a lack of oversight.
  • Public Trust: The case underscores the importance of public trust in the financial system and the damage caused by accounting scandals.

4. Recommendations

  1. Strengthen Auditor Independence: The SEC should implement stricter regulations to enhance auditor independence. This could include:

    • Rotation of Audit Partners: Requiring regular rotation of audit partners to prevent close relationships with clients.
    • Prohibition of Non-Audit Services: Banning accounting firms from providing non-audit services like consulting to their audit clients, to avoid conflicts of interest.
    • Increased Oversight: Establishing a more robust oversight mechanism for accounting firms, including increased scrutiny and audits by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
  2. Promote Transparency and Accountability: The SEC should focus on promoting transparency and accountability in financial reporting. This could involve:

    • Enhanced Disclosure Requirements: Requiring companies to disclose more detailed and transparent financial information, including off-balance sheet items and risk factors.
    • Increased Penalties for Fraud: Imposing stricter penalties for accounting fraud and other financial misconducts to deter such behavior.
    • Improved Corporate Governance Practices: Encouraging companies to adopt stronger corporate governance practices, including independent board oversight, internal controls, and whistleblower protections.
  3. Strengthen Corporate Governance: The SEC should work with the business community to strengthen corporate governance practices. This could include:

    • Mandatory Corporate Governance Standards: Implementing mandatory corporate governance standards for all publicly traded companies, including requirements for independent board directors, audit committees, and internal controls.
    • Shareholder Activism: Encouraging shareholder activism to hold corporate management accountable for their actions.
    • Executive Compensation Reform: Reforming executive compensation structures to align executive incentives with long-term shareholder value creation.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The SEC's core competency lies in regulating the financial markets and protecting investors. The recommendations align with its mission to ensure fair and transparent markets.
  2. External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations directly benefit external customers, investors, and the public, by restoring trust in the financial system. They also benefit internal clients, the SEC staff, by providing them with stronger tools to enforce regulations.
  3. Competitors: The recommendations do not directly target competitors, but they aim to create a level playing field for all companies by ensuring fair and transparent accounting practices.
  4. Attractiveness ' Quantitative Measures: While it is difficult to quantify the benefits of these recommendations, they are expected to lead to increased investor confidence, reduced fraud, and a stronger economy.

6. Conclusion

Arthur Levitt's campaign to reform the accounting profession was a necessary and timely response to the growing problem of accounting scandals. The recommendations outlined above provide a framework for the SEC to achieve its objectives of enhancing auditor independence, promoting transparency and accountability, and strengthening corporate governance. By implementing these reforms, the SEC can help restore investor confidence, protect the public interest, and create a more stable and sustainable financial system.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Self-Regulation: The accounting industry could have been allowed to self-regulate, but this approach has proven ineffective in the past.
  • Minimal Intervention: The SEC could have taken a more hands-off approach, but this would have risked further erosion of public trust in the financial system.

Risks:

  • Resistance from the Accounting Industry: The accounting industry is likely to resist these reforms, as they may impact their profitability and autonomy.
  • Unintended Consequences: The reforms could have unintended consequences, such as increased compliance costs for companies or a shortage of qualified auditors.

Key Assumptions:

  • The SEC has the political will and resources to implement these reforms.
  • The accounting industry will eventually cooperate with the SEC in implementing these reforms.
  • The reforms will be effective in preventing future accounting scandals.

8. Next Steps

  1. Develop Detailed Regulations: The SEC should develop detailed regulations to implement the recommended reforms.
  2. Engage with Stakeholders: The SEC should engage with stakeholders, including the accounting industry, investors, and other government agencies, to gather input and build consensus.
  3. Monitor Implementation: The SEC should closely monitor the implementation of the reforms and make adjustments as necessary.
  4. Public Education: The SEC should undertake a public education campaign to raise awareness about the importance of accounting reforms and the role of investors in holding companies accountable.

By taking these steps, the SEC can ensure that its reforms are implemented effectively and achieve their intended objectives.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign

Case Description

This case highlights the debate between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and several of the large accounting firms over whether the same firms should offer consulting services to clients they audit.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign

Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Negotiations case study - Consulting by Auditors (A): Levitt's Campaign




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.