Free Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts

"Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts" Harvard business case study is written by Rohit Deshpande, Alexis Lefort. It deals with the challenges in the field of Marketing. The case study is 17 page(s) long and it was first published on : Nov 13, 2023

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Kickstarter focus on a multi-pronged strategy to enhance its platform's value proposition and drive sustainable growth. This strategy involves:

  • Strengthening its core offering by improving user experience, expanding project categories, and enhancing project discovery tools.
  • Diversifying revenue streams by introducing new services like project management tools, marketing support, and data analytics for creators.
  • Expanding into new markets by leveraging its global reach and adapting its platform to cater to local cultural nuances.
  • Embracing emerging technologies like AI and blockchain to streamline operations, personalize user experiences, and create new opportunities for creators.

2. Background

Kickstarter is a global crowdfunding platform that allows creators to raise funds from supporters to bring their projects to life. Founded in 2009, it has become a leading platform for artists, musicians, filmmakers, and entrepreneurs to access funding and connect with their audiences.

The case study focuses on Kickstarter's position in 2015, a time of significant growth and competition. The platform faced challenges including:

  • Increasing competition: New crowdfunding platforms were emerging, offering similar services and vying for market share.
  • Evolving user needs: Creators were seeking more support beyond funding, including marketing, project management, and distribution.
  • Growing pains: The platform needed to scale its operations and improve its user experience to accommodate its growing user base.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

To analyze Kickstarter's situation, we can apply a SWOT analysis framework:

Strengths:

  • Strong brand recognition: Kickstarter is a well-established and trusted platform in the crowdfunding space.
  • Large and engaged community: The platform has a large and passionate community of creators and backers.
  • Successful track record: Kickstarter has funded countless projects, demonstrating its effectiveness as a platform for creative endeavors.
  • Focus on creative projects: Kickstarter's focus on arts, culture, and innovation attracts a unique and engaged audience.

Weaknesses:

  • Limited revenue streams: Kickstarter's revenue model relies primarily on a small percentage of the funds raised, making it vulnerable to fluctuations in project funding.
  • Lack of support for creators: The platform offers limited support for creators beyond funding, leaving them to navigate the complexities of project management and marketing on their own.
  • User experience challenges: The platform can be overwhelming for new users, especially in navigating project discovery and funding options.

Opportunities:

  • Expanding into new markets: Kickstarter can leverage its global reach to expand into emerging markets with high growth potential.
  • Developing new revenue streams: The platform can offer additional services like project management tools, marketing support, and data analytics to creators.
  • Embracing emerging technologies: Kickstarter can leverage AI and blockchain to improve efficiency, personalize user experiences, and create new opportunities for creators.

Threats:

  • Increased competition: New crowdfunding platforms are emerging, offering similar services and vying for market share.
  • Changing consumer behavior: Consumers are increasingly demanding more transparency and accountability from crowdfunding platforms.
  • Regulatory challenges: The crowdfunding industry is subject to evolving regulations, which could impact Kickstarter's operations.

4. Recommendations

To address the challenges and capitalize on opportunities, Kickstarter should implement the following recommendations:

1. Enhance the Core Offering:

  • Improve user experience: Simplify the platform's navigation, enhance project discovery tools, and provide more comprehensive support for creators.
  • Expand project categories: Offer a wider range of project categories to cater to diverse creative endeavors and attract a broader audience.
  • Introduce new features: Develop features like project management tools, collaborative workspaces, and integrated marketing platforms to empower creators.

2. Diversify Revenue Streams:

  • Offer premium services: Introduce paid tiers for creators with access to advanced features, marketing support, and data analytics.
  • Partner with brands and organizations: Develop partnerships with brands and organizations to offer sponsored projects and co-branded campaigns.
  • Explore alternative revenue models: Consider subscription-based models, advertising revenue, or transaction fees for certain project types.

3. Expand into New Markets:

  • Adapt the platform for local markets: Translate the platform, localize content, and partner with local influencers to cater to cultural nuances.
  • Target specific demographics: Identify and target specific demographics with high growth potential in emerging markets.
  • Develop strategic partnerships: Collaborate with local organizations and government agencies to promote the platform and build trust.

4. Embrace Emerging Technologies:

  • Leverage AI and machine learning: Utilize AI to personalize user experiences, recommend projects, and optimize project discovery.
  • Explore blockchain technology: Implement blockchain solutions to enhance transparency, security, and efficiency in project funding and management.
  • Develop data-driven insights: Utilize data analytics to understand user behavior, identify trends, and inform product development.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a thorough analysis of Kickstarter's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. They are consistent with Kickstarter's mission to empower creators and bring creative projects to life. The recommendations also consider the evolving needs of creators and backers, the competitive landscape, and the potential of emerging technologies.

Key assumptions:

  • Kickstarter can successfully implement these recommendations without significant disruption to its existing operations.
  • Creators and backers will embrace the platform's new features and services.
  • Emerging technologies will continue to evolve and provide opportunities for innovation.

6. Conclusion

By embracing a multi-pronged strategy that focuses on enhancing its core offering, diversifying revenue streams, expanding into new markets, and leveraging emerging technologies, Kickstarter can solidify its position as a leading platform for creative crowdfunding. This strategy will help it navigate the competitive landscape, meet the evolving needs of creators and backers, and achieve sustainable growth.

7. Discussion

Alternatives not selected:

  • Merging with a competitor: While a merger could provide access to new resources and markets, it could also lead to cultural clashes and loss of brand identity.
  • Focusing solely on existing markets: This approach would limit Kickstarter's growth potential and make it vulnerable to competition.
  • Ignoring emerging technologies: Failing to embrace emerging technologies could lead to a competitive disadvantage in the long run.

Risks and key assumptions:

  • Implementation challenges: Successfully implementing these recommendations requires significant resources, expertise, and commitment.
  • Market acceptance: New features and services must be well-received by creators and backers to be successful.
  • Technological advancements: Emerging technologies are constantly evolving, and Kickstarter must adapt its strategy to remain relevant.

8. Next Steps

Timeline with key milestones:

  • Year 1: Implement user experience improvements, expand project categories, and introduce new features.
  • Year 2: Launch premium services for creators, explore partnerships with brands and organizations, and begin expanding into new markets.
  • Year 3: Fully integrate AI and blockchain technology into the platform, launch new revenue streams, and solidify a global presence.

By taking these steps, Kickstarter can position itself for continued success in the evolving world of crowdfunding.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Marketing case study - Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

Kickstarter was a virtual crowdfunding platform and community that allowed creators of all kinds to raise funding for creative projects. The executive team was wrestling with a tension in its business model: the organization earned the majority of its revenue from projects that were not closely aligned with its mission. The executives saw the mission as raising funds for art projects, however such projects only accounted for 3% of total funds raised. They were also concerned that societal interest in arts was declining. Kickstarter was a Public Benefit Corporation and therefore it measured its success by how well it achieved its mission, not by the size of its profits.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Marketing case study - Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts

Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Marketing case study - Kickstarter: Crowdfunding for the Arts




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.