Free Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A) Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)

"Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)" Harvard business case study is written by Anand Narasimhan, Jennifer Jordan, Shih-Han Huang. It deals with the challenges in the field of Human Resource Management. The case study is 3 page(s) long and it was first published on : Aug 21, 2018

At Fern Fort University, we recommend GE implement a fit-for-purpose performance management system that embraces employee development as a core pillar, fostering a culture of continuous learning and growth. This system should be data-driven, leveraging technology and analytics to provide actionable insights and support objective performance evaluations. The new system should also be flexible enough to cater to the diverse needs of GE's global workforce, while remaining aligned with the company's overarching strategic goals and organizational values.

2. Background

The case study focuses on General Electric's (GE) struggle to revamp its performance management system, dubbed 'Performance Development at GE.' The existing system, implemented in 2015, aimed to simplify the process and empower employees. However, it faced criticism for lacking clarity, objectivity, and alignment with business needs. This resulted in frustration among employees and managers, hindering employee engagement and motivation.

The main protagonists are Jeff Immelt, GE's CEO at the time, and Beth Comstock, GE's Chief Marketing Officer, who spearheaded the development of the new system. They faced the challenge of balancing the need for a streamlined and efficient system with the desire to foster a culture of employee development and performance improvement.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study highlights the following key issues:

1. Lack of Clarity and Objectivity: The existing system lacked clear performance standards and objective metrics, leading to subjective evaluations and inconsistent feedback. This created confusion and dissatisfaction among employees.

2. Disconnect from Business Needs: The system failed to align performance goals with the company's strategic objectives, resulting in a disconnect between individual contributions and overall business success.

3. Limited Focus on Development: The system primarily focused on performance ratings and feedback, neglecting the crucial aspect of employee development and growth. This hindered career advancement and talent retention.

4. Resistance to Change: Employees and managers were resistant to the new system due to its perceived complexity and lack of clarity. This resistance further hampered its effectiveness.

5. Lack of Data-Driven Insights: The system lacked robust data analytics capabilities, hindering the ability to identify performance trends, measure the impact of development initiatives, and make informed decisions.

6. Global Applicability: The system struggled to adapt to the diverse needs and cultural contexts of GE's global workforce, leading to inconsistencies and challenges in implementation.

7. Lack of Employee Engagement: The system failed to engage employees in the performance management process, leading to a sense of detachment and lack of ownership.

8. Limited Focus on Leadership Development: The system did not adequately address the need for developing leadership skills and competencies, which are crucial for driving organizational performance.

9. Lack of Transparency and Communication: The implementation of the new system lacked transparency and effective communication, leading to confusion and mistrust among employees.

10. Limited Integration with HR Systems: The system was not fully integrated with other HR systems, creating inefficiencies and data silos.

Framework for Analysis:

To analyze the case study, we can utilize the Human Resource Management (HRM) framework, focusing on the following key areas:

  • Strategic HRM: Aligning the performance management system with GE's strategic goals and organizational values.
  • Talent Management: Developing and retaining talent through effective performance management, career planning, and leadership development.
  • Employee Relations: Fostering positive employee relations through transparent communication, fair performance evaluations, and employee engagement.
  • Compensation and Benefits: Ensuring that the performance management system is linked to compensation and benefits to motivate and reward high performance.
  • Training and Development: Providing employees with the necessary training and development opportunities to improve their skills and performance.

4. Recommendations

1. Design a Data-Driven and Flexible Performance Management System:

  • Establish Clear Performance Standards: Develop clear, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) performance standards aligned with GE's strategic goals and business needs.
  • Utilize Technology and Analytics: Implement a technology-enabled performance management platform that leverages data analytics to provide objective performance evaluations, identify performance trends, and track employee development progress.
  • Adopt a 360-Degree Feedback Approach: Incorporate feedback from peers, managers, and customers to provide a comprehensive view of employee performance.
  • Develop a Flexible Framework: Design a system that can be adapted to the diverse needs and cultural contexts of GE's global workforce.

2. Foster a Culture of Continuous Learning and Development:

  • Integrate Development Planning: Embed development planning into the performance management process, encouraging employees to identify their development needs and set goals for growth.
  • Provide Targeted Training and Development: Offer a range of training and development programs tailored to individual needs and career aspirations.
  • Encourage Mentorship and Coaching: Promote a culture of mentorship and coaching to support employee development and knowledge sharing.
  • Create Opportunities for Career Advancement: Provide clear career paths and opportunities for advancement based on performance and development.

3. Enhance Employee Engagement and Motivation:

  • Promote Transparency and Communication: Ensure clear communication about the performance management system and its purpose.
  • Provide Regular Feedback and Recognition: Provide regular feedback and recognition for employee contributions and achievements.
  • Link Performance to Rewards: Align performance with compensation and benefits to motivate and reward high performance.
  • Foster a Culture of Collaboration and Teamwork: Encourage collaboration and teamwork to enhance employee engagement and motivation.

4. Develop Strong Leadership Capabilities:

  • Invest in Leadership Development Programs: Provide targeted leadership development programs to enhance the skills and competencies of GE's leaders.
  • Promote a Culture of Servant Leadership: Encourage leaders to focus on empowering and supporting their teams.
  • Develop Leaders at All Levels: Identify and develop potential leaders at all levels of the organization.

5. Ensure Global Applicability and Integration:

  • Adapt the System to Local Contexts: Adapt the performance management system to the specific needs and cultural contexts of GE's global workforce.
  • Ensure Alignment with Local Laws and Regulations: Ensure that the system complies with all applicable laws and regulations in each country where GE operates.
  • Integrate with HR Systems: Integrate the performance management system with other HR systems to streamline processes and improve data accuracy.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The recommendations align with GE's core competencies in technology, innovation, and global reach, while supporting the company's mission to build a world that works.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations prioritize the needs of both external customers and internal clients, ensuring that the performance management system supports the delivery of value to all stakeholders.
  • Competitors: The recommendations consider the best practices of leading companies in the field of performance management, ensuring that GE remains competitive in attracting and retaining top talent.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are designed to enhance the attractiveness of GE as an employer, attracting and retaining top talent through a culture of development, recognition, and reward.
  • Quantitative Measures: The recommendations emphasize the use of data and analytics to measure the effectiveness of the performance management system, providing objective insights into its impact on employee performance and organizational success.
  • Assumptions: The recommendations are based on the assumption that GE is committed to investing in its employees and fostering a culture of continuous learning and development.

6. Conclusion

By implementing these recommendations, GE can create a fit-for-purpose performance management system that fosters a culture of employee development, engagement, and performance improvement. This will enhance employee retention, talent acquisition, and ultimately drive organizational success.

7. Discussion

Alternatives not Selected:

  • Maintaining the Existing System: This option would be detrimental to GE's long-term success, as it would continue to perpetuate the existing problems of lack of clarity, objectivity, and alignment with business needs.
  • Adopting a Traditional Performance Rating System: This option would be counterproductive, as it would revert to a system that is outdated, inflexible, and demotivating for employees.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Resistance to Change: There is a risk of resistance to change from employees and managers who are accustomed to the existing system. This risk can be mitigated through clear communication, effective training, and a phased implementation approach.
  • Cost of Implementation: Implementing a new performance management system requires significant investment in technology, training, and communication. This risk can be addressed by prioritizing key elements and implementing the system in phases.
  • Data Accuracy and Integrity: The success of a data-driven performance management system relies on the accuracy and integrity of the data collected. This risk can be mitigated through robust data governance policies and procedures.

Options Grid:

OptionBenefitsRisksCosts
Maintain Existing SystemLow cost, familiar processContinued dissatisfaction, lack of alignmentMinimal
Traditional Performance Rating SystemSimple to implement, familiar approachOutdated, demotivating, lacks development focusLow
Data-Driven and Flexible SystemImproved clarity, objectivity, and alignmentResistance to change, implementation costHigh

8. Next Steps

Timeline with Key Milestones:

  • Month 1-3: Conduct a thorough review of the existing performance management system, identify key issues, and gather input from employees and managers.
  • Month 4-6: Develop a detailed plan for the new performance management system, including goals, objectives, and implementation strategy.
  • Month 7-9: Pilot test the new system with a small group of employees and gather feedback.
  • Month 10-12: Implement the new system across the organization, providing comprehensive training and support.
  • Month 13-18: Monitor the effectiveness of the new system, gather data, and make adjustments as needed.

By following these steps, GE can successfully implement a fit-for-purpose performance management system that supports its strategic goals, fosters employee development, and drives organizational success.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)

Case Description

In 2013, GE implemented the FastWorks program, an initiative that utilized tools and methods adapted from start-up methodologies to make the company more customer centric, lean and agile. With the spread of FastWorks within GE, a startling conclusion became evident - the existing performance management system might no longer be fit for the company's new direction. This case series follows the journey of GE's new performance management system, Performance Development, and its PD@GE app. By utilizing FastWorks in its development process, the HR team was able to leverage customer feedback and rapid prototyping to build a new system with unique features, such as instantaneous feedback, upward feedback and removal of employee ratings.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)

Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A) FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A) ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A) case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A). Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A) & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A) solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A) to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A) ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A) case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Performance Development at GE: Shaping a Fit-For-Purpose Performance Management System (A)




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.