Free Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas

"Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas" Harvard business case study is written by Dean Xu, Penelope Chan. It deals with the challenges in the field of General Management. The case study is 37 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jun 24, 2010

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co. Ltd. (STHIC) reconsider the acquisition of Hummer from General Motors (GM). While the acquisition presents opportunities for STHIC to enter the US market and gain access to Hummer's brand and technology, the potential risks and challenges outweigh the potential benefits.

2. Background

This case study focuses on STHIC's proposed acquisition of Hummer in 2009. STHIC, a Chinese heavy machinery manufacturer, saw this acquisition as a strategic move to expand its international presence and gain access to the lucrative US market. However, the deal faced significant scrutiny from both the US and Chinese governments, ultimately leading to its collapse.

The main protagonists in this case are:

  • STHIC: A Chinese company seeking to expand its global reach and diversify its business portfolio.
  • General Motors (GM): A struggling American automaker looking to divest its non-core assets, including Hummer.
  • US Government: Concerned about the potential national security implications of a Chinese company acquiring a US brand with military ties.
  • Chinese Government: Concerned about the potential risks and challenges associated with overseas acquisitions, particularly in a politically sensitive sector like the automotive industry.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study highlights several key challenges faced by Chinese companies undertaking overseas acquisitions, particularly in the context of the US market. These challenges can be analyzed through the lens of various frameworks:

Strategic Framework:

  • SWOT Analysis: STHIC's acquisition of Hummer presented both strengths and weaknesses.
    • Strengths: Access to Hummer's brand recognition, technology, and US market presence.
    • Weaknesses: Lack of experience in the US automotive market, potential cultural and language barriers, and regulatory hurdles.
  • Porter's Five Forces: The US automotive industry is highly competitive, with established players like Ford and Chrysler, as well as emerging competitors from Asia. The acquisition of Hummer would have placed STHIC in a challenging competitive environment.
  • Competitive Advantage: STHIC lacked a clear competitive advantage in the US market. Hummer's brand was struggling, and STHIC's core competency in heavy machinery did not translate well to the passenger vehicle market.

Financial Framework:

  • Valuation: The acquisition price was considered too high by many analysts, given Hummer's declining sales and profitability.
  • Financing: STHIC faced difficulties securing financing for the acquisition, as banks were hesitant to lend to a Chinese company entering a new and challenging market.
  • Return on Investment (ROI): The potential ROI for STHIC was uncertain, given the risks and challenges associated with the acquisition.

Cultural & Operational Framework:

  • Cross-cultural Management: Integrating Hummer's US workforce and culture into STHIC's Chinese organizational structure presented significant challenges.
  • Operations Strategy: STHIC lacked experience in manufacturing and distributing vehicles in the US market, requiring significant investment and expertise.
  • Change Management: Implementing organizational changes within Hummer to align with STHIC's vision and strategy would have been complex and disruptive.

4. Recommendations

STHIC should reconsider the acquisition of Hummer. The potential risks and challenges outweigh the potential benefits. Instead of pursuing a high-risk acquisition, STHIC should focus on:

  • Developing a long-term strategy for entering the US market. This strategy should be based on a thorough analysis of the market, competitors, and potential opportunities.
  • Building partnerships with US companies. This could involve joint ventures, technology licensing agreements, or other collaborative arrangements.
  • Investing in research and development to develop new products and technologies that meet the needs of the US market. This would allow STHIC to build a competitive advantage in the long term.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: STHIC's core competency lies in heavy machinery, not passenger vehicles. Acquiring Hummer would have been a significant departure from its core business and would have created challenges in managing two vastly different operations.
  • External customers and internal clients: STHIC lacked a clear understanding of the US market and its customers. The acquisition would have required significant investment in marketing, distribution, and customer service to build brand awareness and loyalty.
  • Competitors: The US automotive market is highly competitive, with established players like Ford and Chrysler, as well as emerging competitors from Asia. STHIC would have faced significant challenges in competing against these established players.
  • Attractiveness ' quantitative measures: The acquisition price was considered too high by many analysts, given Hummer's declining sales and profitability. The potential return on investment was uncertain, given the risks and challenges associated with the acquisition.

6. Conclusion

The acquisition of Hummer presented significant challenges for STHIC, including regulatory hurdles, cultural differences, and a lack of experience in the US automotive market. While the acquisition offered opportunities for STHIC to enter the US market, the potential risks and challenges outweighed the potential benefits. STHIC should focus on developing a long-term strategy for entering the US market that is based on its core competencies and strengths.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Acquiring a smaller, more niche US company: This would have allowed STHIC to gain experience in the US market with less risk and investment.
  • Partnering with a US company to develop and market a new product: This would have allowed STHIC to leverage its technical expertise and the US company's market knowledge.

Key assumptions:

  • The US government would have approved the acquisition: The US government's concerns about national security implications were a significant factor in the deal's collapse.
  • STHIC would have been able to integrate Hummer's US workforce and culture into its Chinese organizational structure: Cultural differences and language barriers could have created significant challenges in integrating the two companies.
  • STHIC would have been able to secure financing for the acquisition: Banks were hesitant to lend to a Chinese company entering a new and challenging market.

8. Next Steps

STHIC should:

  • Conduct a thorough analysis of the US automotive market. This should include an assessment of market trends, competitive landscape, and potential opportunities.
  • Develop a long-term strategy for entering the US market. This strategy should be based on STHIC's core competencies and strengths.
  • Identify potential partners in the US. This could involve joint ventures, technology licensing agreements, or other collaborative arrangements.
  • Invest in research and development to develop new products and technologies that meet the needs of the US market. This would allow STHIC to build a competitive advantage in the long term.

By taking these steps, STHIC can increase its chances of success in the US market while minimizing the risks associated with a high-risk acquisition.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In June 2009, Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Company Limited ("Tengzhong"), a little-known manufacturer of construction machinery and special-use vehicles in south-western China, took the global auto industry by surprise when it announced its plan to acquire the money-losing Hummer division of General Motors Corp. Hummer's premium sport-utility vehicles and sport-utility trucks had relatively low fuel efficiency of 9−16 miles per gallon. Since 2006, Hummer's sales volume had declined sharply due to escalating oil prices, its negative image as a "gas-guzzler" and a shift in customer preferences towards smaller sedans. Tengzhong had no prior experience in the light vehicle industry or in managing a major auto brand. Because this was Tengzhong's first attempt at foreign direct investment, it was imperative for its management to figure out the major obstacles in managing its new Hummer subsidiary in the US. They also had to formulate a sound business plan to get the Chinese government's approval for this acquisition, and to make the investment a big success. (Note: This acquisition was called off in February 2010 because Tengzhong was not able to get the Chinese government's approval. The details are included in Appendix 1 of the teaching note for reference.)

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas

Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Acquisition of Hummer: M&A Challenges Faced by Chinese Companies Overseas




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.