Free Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc. Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc.

"Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc." Harvard business case study is written by hard S. Ruback. It deals with the challenges in the field of Finance. The case study is 21 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 29, 1989

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Philip Morris Companies proceed with the spin-off of Kraft, Inc. This strategic move will unlock shareholder value by separating the two distinct businesses, allowing each to focus on its core competencies and pursue growth opportunities independently. The spin-off will also provide greater flexibility in capital allocation and financial strategy for both companies.

2. Background

This case study examines the strategic decision facing Philip Morris Companies in 1997: whether to spin off its food and beverage subsidiary, Kraft, Inc. Philip Morris, a tobacco giant, had acquired Kraft in 1988, creating a conglomerate with diverse business interests. However, by the late 1990s, investors began to question the value of this conglomerate structure, favoring focused companies with clear strategic direction.

The main protagonists in this case are:

  • Philip Morris Companies: A global tobacco conglomerate seeking to maximize shareholder value and navigate a changing market landscape.
  • Kraft, Inc.: A leading food and beverage company with a strong brand portfolio and established market position.
  • Investors: Seeking higher returns and a clear understanding of the value proposition of each company.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case can be analyzed through the lens of corporate strategy, specifically focusing on the portfolio management of diversified businesses. The key question is whether the combined entity of Philip Morris and Kraft is creating more value than the two companies would generate independently.

Financial Analysis:

  • Financial statements analysis: Examining the financial performance of both Philip Morris and Kraft reveals significant differences in growth potential, profitability, and risk profiles. Kraft, with its consumer staples business, enjoys more stable earnings and lower risk compared to Philip Morris's tobacco business, which faces regulatory and health concerns.
  • Valuation methods: Applying valuation methods like discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis and comparable company analysis can help estimate the intrinsic value of each company separately. This analysis can reveal whether the combined entity is trading at a discount or premium to its intrinsic value.
  • Capital budgeting: The spin-off would allow both companies to pursue independent capital budgeting decisions, allocating resources more efficiently to projects aligned with their respective growth strategies.

Strategic Considerations:

  • Core competencies: Philip Morris and Kraft operate in distinct industries with different core competencies. Separating them allows each company to focus on its core strengths and develop specialized strategies.
  • Growth opportunities: The spin-off provides greater flexibility for both companies to pursue growth opportunities in their respective markets. Kraft can focus on expanding its global footprint and developing new product lines, while Philip Morris can explore new markets and technologies in the tobacco industry.
  • Risk management: Separating the two businesses allows for more effective risk management. Kraft's lower risk profile provides investors with a more stable investment option, while Philip Morris can focus on mitigating risks associated with the tobacco industry.

4. Recommendations

We recommend that Philip Morris Companies proceed with the spin-off of Kraft, Inc. This recommendation is based on the following key actions:

  1. Develop a detailed spin-off plan: This plan should include the legal structure, tax implications, and timeline for the separation. It should also address the allocation of assets, liabilities, and employees between the two companies.
  2. Communicate the spin-off to stakeholders: Philip Morris should communicate the rationale for the spin-off to investors, employees, and other stakeholders. This communication should highlight the benefits of the separation and address potential concerns.
  3. Prepare both companies for independence: Both Philip Morris and Kraft should be prepared to operate independently, with separate management teams, financial strategies, and corporate governance structures.

5. Basis of Recommendations

This recommendation is based on the following considerations:

  1. Core competencies and consistency with mission: The spin-off allows both companies to focus on their core competencies and pursue strategies aligned with their respective missions.
  2. External customers and internal clients: The spin-off provides greater flexibility for both companies to address the needs of their respective customer bases.
  3. Competitors: The spin-off allows both companies to compete more effectively in their respective industries, free from the constraints of a conglomerate structure.
  4. Attractiveness: The spin-off is expected to unlock shareholder value by allowing each company to trade at a higher multiple based on its individual performance and growth potential.

6. Conclusion

The spin-off of Kraft, Inc. represents a strategic opportunity for Philip Morris Companies to unlock shareholder value, enhance operational efficiency, and position both companies for long-term growth. By separating these distinct businesses, Philip Morris can create a more focused and agile organization, while Kraft can pursue growth opportunities in the food and beverage industry.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives considered include:

  • Maintaining the conglomerate structure: This would have continued to face investor skepticism and limit the growth potential of both businesses.
  • Selling Kraft to another company: This would have resulted in a significant capital gain for Philip Morris but would have also limited its future involvement in the food and beverage industry.

Risks:

  • Market reaction: The spin-off may initially be met with uncertainty from the market, potentially impacting the stock prices of both companies.
  • Integration challenges: Both companies may face challenges in integrating their operations and establishing new corporate governance structures.
  • Regulatory hurdles: The spin-off may face regulatory scrutiny, potentially delaying the process.

Key assumptions:

  • The market will recognize the value of the spin-off and reward both companies with higher valuations.
  • Both companies will be able to successfully integrate their operations and achieve their respective growth targets.
  • The regulatory environment will not pose significant obstacles to the spin-off.

8. Next Steps

The following steps should be taken to implement the spin-off:

  • Develop a detailed spin-off plan: This plan should be completed within the next six months.
  • Communicate the spin-off to stakeholders: This communication should be initiated within the next three months.
  • Prepare both companies for independence: This process should be completed within the next twelve months.

The spin-off of Kraft, Inc. is a significant strategic decision for Philip Morris Companies. By carefully planning and executing the separation, Philip Morris can unlock shareholder value and position both companies for long-term success.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc.

Case Description

Gives students the opportunity to explore the effect of substantial free cash flow on corporate acquisition and operating strategies. Students are also given the opportunity to extract information from the common stock prices of the participating firms. A variety of valuation techniques are employed to assess the plausibility of a restructuring plan.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc.

Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc. FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc." case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc. ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc. case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc.. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc." at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc. & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc." at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc. solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc.

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc." at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc."?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc. to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc. ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc. case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc." case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Philip Morris Companies and Kraft, Inc.




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.