Free Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc. Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc.

"Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc." Harvard business case study is written by William E. Fruhan. It deals with the challenges in the field of Finance. The case study is 19 page(s) long and it was first published on : Apr 23, 2004

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Global Information Systems, Inc. (GIS) proceed with a phased approach to offshoring its software development operations to India. This strategy involves a careful selection of projects, a gradual transfer of work, and a robust risk management framework. GIS should prioritize building a strong partnership with the chosen Indian vendor, ensuring clear communication, knowledge transfer, and cultural sensitivity. This approach will allow GIS to leverage the cost advantages of offshoring while mitigating risks and ensuring the quality of its software development services.

2. Background

Global Information Systems, Inc. (GIS) is a US-based software development company facing increasing pressure from competitors offering lower prices. The company's CEO, John Smith, is considering offshoring a portion of its software development operations to India to reduce costs and remain competitive. However, GIS is concerned about potential risks associated with offshoring, including quality control, security, and communication challenges.

The case study focuses on the decision-making process for GIS as it considers offshoring. The main protagonists are John Smith, the CEO, and the company's management team, who are responsible for evaluating the potential benefits and risks of offshoring.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of a strategic framework that considers both internal and external factors influencing GIS's decision.

Internal Factors:

  • Financial Performance: GIS is facing pressure from competitors offering lower prices, indicating a need for cost reduction strategies.
  • Core Competencies: GIS's core competency lies in software development. Offshoring could potentially impact this competency if not managed effectively.
  • Organizational Culture: GIS's culture and employee morale may be impacted by offshoring, requiring careful communication and change management.

External Factors:

  • Global Market: The global market for software development is highly competitive, with emerging markets like India offering cost advantages.
  • Technology: The advancement of technology has facilitated remote collaboration and communication, enabling efficient offshoring.
  • Government Policy: Government policies and regulations regarding offshoring need to be considered, including data privacy and intellectual property protection.

Financial Analysis:

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis: GIS needs to conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis to determine the potential savings from offshoring, factoring in costs associated with training, infrastructure, and communication.
  • Return on Investment (ROI): GIS should calculate the ROI of offshoring to evaluate its financial viability and compare it with other investment opportunities.
  • Cash Flow Management: Offshoring can impact cash flows, requiring careful planning and management of working capital.

Risk Assessment:

  • Quality Control: GIS needs to establish robust quality control measures to ensure the quality of software developed offshore.
  • Security: Data security and intellectual property protection are critical concerns that need to be addressed through appropriate security protocols and agreements.
  • Communication: Clear communication channels and cultural sensitivity are essential for effective collaboration between onshore and offshore teams.

4. Recommendations

Based on the analysis, we recommend the following steps for GIS:

  1. Phased Approach to Offshoring: Instead of immediately offshoring a large portion of its operations, GIS should adopt a phased approach, starting with a small, well-defined project. This allows for gradual knowledge transfer, risk mitigation, and assessment of the chosen vendor's capabilities.
  2. Strategic Vendor Selection: GIS should carefully select an Indian vendor with a proven track record in software development, strong communication skills, and a commitment to quality. The vendor should also be culturally sensitive and willing to adapt to GIS's processes and standards.
  3. Robust Risk Management Framework: GIS should develop a comprehensive risk management framework that addresses potential risks associated with offshoring, including quality control, security, communication, and cultural differences.
  4. Knowledge Transfer and Training: GIS should invest in training programs to ensure the Indian vendor's understanding of GIS's processes, technologies, and standards. This will facilitate smooth knowledge transfer and minimize potential quality issues.
  5. Clear Communication Channels: GIS needs to establish clear communication channels between onshore and offshore teams, including regular meetings, status updates, and project documentation. This will ensure effective collaboration and prevent misunderstandings.
  6. Cultural Sensitivity: GIS should be mindful of cultural differences between the US and India and implement strategies to foster cross-cultural understanding and collaboration.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The phased approach to offshoring allows GIS to leverage cost advantages while maintaining its core competencies and remaining consistent with its mission.
  2. External Customers and Internal Clients: By ensuring quality and timely delivery, GIS can maintain customer satisfaction and internal client trust.
  3. Competitors: Offshoring allows GIS to remain competitive by offering lower prices while maintaining quality, enabling it to compete effectively in the global market.
  4. Attractiveness - Quantitative Measures: The cost-benefit analysis and ROI calculations will demonstrate the financial attractiveness of offshoring, justifying the investment.

All assumptions, including the availability of qualified vendors, the effectiveness of communication channels, and the success of knowledge transfer programs, are explicitly stated and considered in the recommendations.

6. Conclusion

Offshoring can be a viable strategy for GIS to reduce costs and remain competitive in the global software development market. However, it requires careful planning, risk management, and a phased approach to ensure success. By following the recommendations outlined above, GIS can effectively leverage the benefits of offshoring while mitigating potential risks and maintaining its core competencies.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Outsourcing to US-based firms: This option would provide greater control and potentially better communication, but it would not offer the cost advantages of offshoring.
  • Acquisition of an Indian software development company: This option would provide immediate access to skilled resources and a local presence in India, but it would require significant investment and integration challenges.

Key assumptions and risks associated with the recommended approach include:

  • Availability of qualified vendors: Finding a reliable and capable vendor in India is crucial for the success of offshoring.
  • Effective communication channels: Maintaining clear and consistent communication between onshore and offshore teams is essential for collaboration and knowledge transfer.
  • Successful knowledge transfer: The success of offshoring depends on the effectiveness of knowledge transfer programs and the ability of the Indian vendor to understand and implement GIS's processes and standards.

8. Next Steps

GIS should implement the following steps in a phased manner:

  • Phase 1 (3 months): Conduct a thorough vendor selection process, including due diligence and site visits.
  • Phase 2 (6 months): Pilot a small, well-defined project with the chosen vendor, focusing on knowledge transfer and quality control.
  • Phase 3 (12 months): Gradually increase the scope of offshored projects based on the success of the pilot project, continuously monitoring and managing risks.

By following this timeline and implementing the recommendations outlined in this case study solution, GIS can successfully navigate the challenges of offshoring and achieve its strategic objectives of cost reduction and competitive advantage.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc.

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

This case explores the topic of offshoring high-tech jobs several perspectives. The issues presented include determining the stock price consequences of offshoring, examining the economic consequences of the offshore job to both the transferring and receiving countries, considering the competitive consequences of not offshoring, and thinking through the challenge of investing in a career that is vulnerable to future offshoring.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc.

Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc. FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc." case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc. ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc. case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc.. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc." at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc. & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc." at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc. solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc.

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc." at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc."?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc. to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc. ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc. case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc." case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Offshoring at Global Information Systems, Inc.




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.