Free Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation

"Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation" Harvard business case study is written by Andy Zelleke, Brian Tilley. It deals with the challenges in the field of Business & Government Relations. The case study is 38 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jul 25, 2017

At Fern Fort University, we recommend Carrier Corporation adopt a multifaceted strategy that balances the immediate need to retain jobs in Indiana with a long-term vision for sustainable growth and competitiveness. This strategy should prioritize business and government relations, corporate social responsibility, and strategic planning to navigate the complex landscape of globalization, trade, and government policy.

2. Background

The case study centers on Carrier Corporation, a major manufacturer of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, facing the decision to relocate its Indianapolis plant to Mexico. This decision was driven by factors such as lower labor costs and increased competition in the global market. However, the move sparked significant public outcry, particularly from President-elect Donald Trump, who promised to keep jobs in the U.S. through trade negotiations and government intervention.

The main protagonists are Carrier Corporation, represented by its CEO, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, and the employees of the Indianapolis plant. The case highlights the complex interplay between business interests, political pressure, and social concerns in a globalized economy.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of Porter's Five Forces framework:

  • Threat of New Entrants: Relatively high due to the global nature of the HVAC industry and the availability of low-cost manufacturing options in emerging markets.
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers: Moderate, as buyers have access to a wide range of HVAC products and services, but large-scale projects may create dependence on specific suppliers.
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Moderate, as suppliers of raw materials and components have some leverage, but technological advancements and global sourcing options provide flexibility.
  • Threat of Substitutes: Moderate, as alternative heating and cooling technologies are emerging, but traditional HVAC systems remain dominant in many markets.
  • Competitive Rivalry: High, with intense competition from both domestic and international players, leading to price wars and product differentiation strategies.

Furthermore, the case study highlights the following key aspects:

  • Globalization and Trade: The decision to relocate to Mexico reflects the globalized nature of manufacturing and the search for lower production costs. This highlights the complex relationship between trade policies, foreign investment, and economic growth.
  • Government Policy and Regulation: The involvement of the U.S. President-elect demonstrates the significant role of government intervention in shaping business decisions. This includes tax incentives, trade agreements, and regulatory frameworks.
  • Corporate Social Responsibility: Carrier Corporation's decision to relocate faced criticism for its potential impact on the local community and its employees. This highlights the increasing importance of corporate social responsibility in balancing business interests with ethical considerations.
  • Strategic Planning: The case study underscores the need for businesses to develop comprehensive strategic plans that account for global competition, changing market dynamics, and the potential for government intervention.

4. Recommendations

Carrier Corporation should adopt a multi-pronged strategy:

Short-term:

  1. Negotiate with the U.S. government: Carrier should leverage its strong business and government relations to negotiate favorable terms with the Trump administration, potentially including tax incentives, government contracts, or subsidies. This should be done in a transparent and ethical manner, avoiding any perception of corporate political activity that could damage its reputation.
  2. Invest in workforce development: Carrier should partner with local educational institutions and community organizations to invest in workforce development programs that enhance the skills of its existing employees and prepare them for the future. This will demonstrate a commitment to the Indianapolis community and strengthen its workforce.
  3. Enhance operational efficiency: Carrier should implement operational improvements to reduce costs and improve efficiency at the Indianapolis plant. This may include technology upgrades, process optimization, and lean manufacturing techniques.

Long-term:

  1. Diversify product lines and markets: Carrier should expand its product portfolio to include higher-value products and target new markets with higher growth potential. This will reduce its reliance on low-cost manufacturing and mitigate the risks associated with global competition.
  2. Embrace innovation: Carrier should invest in research and development to develop innovative products and technologies that differentiate it from competitors. This will enhance its competitiveness and create new opportunities for growth.
  3. Strengthen corporate social responsibility: Carrier should actively engage in corporate social responsibility initiatives that benefit the communities where it operates. This includes promoting environmental sustainability, supporting local charities, and promoting diversity and inclusion within its workforce.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: Carrier's core competency lies in its expertise in HVAC technology and its strong brand reputation. The recommendations align with its mission to provide innovative and reliable solutions for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning needs.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations aim to satisfy both external customers by providing high-quality products and services and internal clients by ensuring job security and career development opportunities.
  • Competitors: The recommendations focus on differentiating Carrier from its competitors by emphasizing innovation, product diversification, and a strong commitment to social responsibility.
  • Attractiveness ' quantitative measures: While specific financial metrics are not provided in the case study, the recommendations are expected to improve profitability through cost reduction, increased market share, and enhanced brand value.

6. Conclusion

Carrier Corporation faces a complex challenge in balancing its business interests with social responsibility and political pressure. By adopting a multifaceted strategy that prioritizes business and government relations, corporate social responsibility, and strategic planning, Carrier can navigate this complex landscape and achieve sustainable growth while upholding its commitment to its employees and the communities it serves.

7. Discussion

Alternative options include:

  • Relocating the plant to Mexico: This option would offer immediate cost savings but would come at the expense of job losses in Indianapolis and potential reputational damage.
  • Closing the Indianapolis plant entirely: This option would minimize costs but would have a significant negative impact on the local community and could lead to a decline in Carrier's brand image.

The key assumptions of our recommendations include:

  • The U.S. government will be willing to negotiate favorable terms with Carrier.
  • Carrier can successfully implement operational improvements and cost reductions at the Indianapolis plant.
  • The global HVAC market will continue to grow and offer opportunities for diversification.

These assumptions are based on the current political climate and the long-term trends in the HVAC industry. However, there are risks associated with these assumptions, such as changes in government policy, unexpected economic downturns, or increased competition from emerging markets.

8. Next Steps

To implement these recommendations, Carrier should:

  • Establish a task force: A cross-functional task force should be formed to develop and implement the strategic plan.
  • Engage with stakeholders: Carrier should actively engage with its employees, local community leaders, and government officials to build consensus and support for its strategy.
  • Monitor progress and adapt: Carrier should regularly monitor the progress of its initiatives and make adjustments as needed to ensure the success of its long-term strategy.

By taking these steps, Carrier can navigate the challenges of globalization and government intervention while ensuring its long-term success and contributing to the well-being of its stakeholders.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

This case examines the influence of political pressure on corporate decision-making. It questions whether fidelity to domestic operations ought to be a corporate social responsibility, and thus it challenges the limits of "social responsibility" as a corporate ideal. Specifically, the case focuses on Donald Trump's effort to encourage U.S. companies' domestic operations, through a study of one company's decision to backtrack on a factory relocation plan. In February 2016, the Carrier Corporation (a maker of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning equipment and a division of United Technologies Corporation) announced a plan to relocate operations of a furnace factory from the United States to Mexico. The case notes that Carrier began to outsource and offshore operations, in an effort to reduce costs, around 1921. While Carrier's previous United States factory closures had garnered major press coverage, the 2016 announcement ramified differently. Days later, then-presidential candidate Donald Trump referenced the relocation in a Facebook post. Soon, Carrier's plan became a touchtone to Trump's anti-globalization and anti-free trade campaign messaging. The case documents that he was not the only candidate or politician to reference Carrier during the 2016 campaign. Still his declaration to "call up the head of Carrier" upon winning the presidency became a stump-speech refrain popular with his audiences, and contrasted with other political figures' more measured language. Ultimately, the case outlines the events set in motion after Trump kept his campaign promise and called Carrier's parent company's CEO one week after his surprise presidential election victory.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation

Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Business Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient human resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Donald Trump Calls Carrier Corporation




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.