Free Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA

"Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA" Harvard business case study is written by David A. Moss, Amy Smekar, Dean Grodzins, Rachel Wilf, Marc Campasano. It deals with the challenges in the field of Business & Government Relations. The case study is 39 page(s) long and it was first published on : Feb 10, 2016

This case study analysis recommends a multi-pronged approach to advance the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) in the United States, focusing on a combination of strategic legal advocacy, public awareness campaigns, and political engagement. This approach aims to build momentum for ERA ratification, address the historical and contemporary challenges to its passage, and ultimately achieve equal rights for women under the Constitution.

2. Background

This case study examines the long and complex history of the ERA, from its initial introduction in 1923 to its current status as a controversial and debated amendment. The ERA, which seeks to guarantee equal rights for women, has faced significant opposition and legal challenges throughout its history. The case study highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the ERA, particularly its potential impact on social policy, gender equality, and the balance of power between the federal government and individual states.

The main protagonists in this case study are:

  • Proponents of the ERA: These individuals and organizations believe that the ERA is essential to achieving true gender equality in the United States. They argue that the amendment is necessary to protect women from discrimination in all areas of life, including employment, education, and healthcare.
  • Opponents of the ERA: These individuals and organizations argue that the ERA is unnecessary or even harmful, arguing that it could lead to unintended consequences, such as increased government intervention in private life or the erosion of traditional gender roles. They also raise concerns about the potential impact of the ERA on business and government relations, particularly in areas like corporate governance regulations and labor laws.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of political strategy and public policy. The ERA's journey has been shaped by shifting political tides, evolving social norms, and the complex interplay of federal and state power. The case study highlights the following key factors:

  • Political Polarization: The ERA has become a highly politicized issue, with strong opinions on both sides of the debate. This polarization has made it difficult to build consensus and achieve ratification.
  • Legal Challenges: The ERA has faced numerous legal challenges, including questions about its validity and the process of ratification. These legal battles have significantly delayed the amendment's passage.
  • Social and Cultural Shifts: The ERA's journey reflects broader societal changes regarding gender roles and women's rights. The rise of the feminist movement in the 1960s and 1970s significantly boosted support for the ERA, while subsequent cultural shifts have led to more nuanced perspectives on gender equality.

4. Recommendations

To advance the ERA and achieve its goals, the following recommendations are proposed:

  • Strategic Legal Advocacy: Proponents should focus on building a strong legal case for the ERA, addressing potential legal challenges and ensuring its constitutional validity. This includes working with legal experts, engaging in legal proceedings, and advocating for judicial interpretation that supports the amendment's intent.
  • Public Awareness Campaigns: Launching comprehensive public awareness campaigns is crucial to educate the public about the ERA, its history, and its potential benefits. These campaigns should target diverse audiences, address common misconceptions, and highlight the importance of gender equality in the 21st century.
  • Political Engagement: Building political support for the ERA is essential for its ratification. This involves engaging with elected officials at all levels, lobbying for legislative action, and mobilizing grassroots support. This also includes addressing concerns about the ERA's potential impact on economic policy, particularly in areas like tax incentives and government subsidies for businesses.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The recommendations align with the core mission of promoting gender equality and ensuring women's rights. They leverage the expertise of legal professionals and advocates, while also emphasizing public engagement and political mobilization.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations consider the needs of both external stakeholders, such as women and marginalized communities, and internal stakeholders, such as advocacy organizations and legal experts.
  • Competitors: The recommendations acknowledge the opposition to the ERA and its potential impact on business and government relations. They aim to build a strong and persuasive case for the amendment, addressing concerns and building consensus.
  • Attractiveness ' Quantitative Measures: While the ERA's impact is primarily qualitative, it can be assessed through its potential to reduce gender inequality, improve women's economic participation, and enhance social justice.

6. Conclusion

The fight for the ERA is a long-standing battle for gender equality in the United States. While the path forward may be challenging, a strategic approach that combines legal advocacy, public awareness, and political engagement can help advance the amendment and achieve its goals. By addressing the historical and contemporary challenges to the ERA, proponents can build momentum, overcome opposition, and ultimately ensure that women have equal rights and opportunities under the Constitution.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Focusing solely on legal challenges: This approach may be too narrow and could lead to a protracted legal battle without broader public support.
  • Relying solely on public awareness campaigns: This approach may not be sufficient to overcome political opposition and achieve legislative action.
  • Ignoring the concerns of opponents: This approach could alienate potential allies and hinder the ERA's progress.

The recommendations acknowledge the following risks and key assumptions:

  • Risk of continued political opposition: This risk can be mitigated by building broader public support and engaging in constructive dialogue with opponents.
  • Assumption of a changing political climate: This assumption is based on evolving social norms and increasing public support for gender equality.

8. Next Steps

To implement these recommendations, the following timeline with key milestones is proposed:

  • Year 1: Launch public awareness campaigns, engage in strategic legal advocacy, and build political support at the grassroots level.
  • Year 2: Focus on legislative action, lobbying for ERA ratification, and addressing concerns of opponents.
  • Year 3: Continue public awareness campaigns, strengthen legal arguments, and build momentum for ratification.

The successful implementation of these recommendations will require a coordinated effort from advocates, legal experts, and policymakers. It will also require a commitment to public engagement and a willingness to address the concerns of all stakeholders.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

On the afternoon of June 21, 1982, the Florida Senate prepared to vote on whether to ratify the proposed Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the U.S. Constitution, which stated that "Equality of Rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." Supporters believed the ERA was essential to winning equal rights for women. Opponents claimed that the proposed amendment would dangerously expand federal power over the states, remove needed protections for women, and undermine the American family. When Congress had sent the ERA to the states for ratification, in March 1972, it had done so through a joint resolution stipulating that state legislatures had to ratify it within seven years. As the deadline neared, however, only 35 of the requisite 38 states had voted to ratify the amendment, four of which later voted to rescind ratification, though ERA supporters questioned the constitutionality of rescission. In October 1978, Congress extended the ratification deadline to June 30, 1982, a move that ERA opponents denounced as unconstitutional. Over the next several years, one more state voted to rescind, and no new states ratified. In 1982, ERA supporters made a final push for ratification. That June, the governor of Florida, an ERA supporter, called the state legislature into special session to consider, among other issues, approval of the ERA. If Florida ratified, supporters hoped that Illinois and either Oklahoma or North Carolina would quickly follow. On June 21, thousands of demonstrators, both for and against the amendment, converged on the state capitol in Tallahassee. That morning, the Florida House voted in favor of the ERA, 60 to 58. Now it was up to the Florida Senate to decide whether to ratify the amendment or to kill it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA

Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Business Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient human resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Business Government case study - Democracy and Women's Rights in America: The Fight over the ERA




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.