Free Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses! Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!

"Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!" Harvard business case study is written by Pascale Lapointe-Antunes, Deborah McPhee. It deals with the challenges in the field of Accounting. The case study is 16 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jan 1, 2018

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a comprehensive approach to address the ethical and financial issues arising from the unauthorized bonus payments at Houston Aerospace. This involves a combination of immediate corrective actions, robust internal controls, and a thorough investigation to prevent future occurrences. We further recommend a review of the company's corporate governance practices, employee incentive structures, and financial reporting processes to ensure alignment with ethical standards and best practices.

2. Background

This case study focuses on Houston Aerospace, a company struggling to maintain profitability in a competitive market. The company's CEO, John Smith, and his team awarded themselves substantial bonuses despite the company's financial difficulties. This action raised concerns about ethical behavior and potential financial impropriety. The case highlights the challenges of ensuring ethical conduct and maintaining financial transparency within organizations, particularly during periods of financial stress.

The main protagonists include John Smith, the CEO, and the executive team who received the unauthorized bonuses. The case also involves the Board of Directors, who ultimately have the responsibility to oversee the company's operations and ensure ethical conduct.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of several frameworks, including:

  • Corporate Governance: The case highlights the failure of the Board of Directors to effectively oversee the company's operations and ensure ethical behavior. The lack of proper oversight and internal controls allowed the executive team to act with impunity, resulting in the unauthorized bonus payments.
  • Financial Reporting and Accounting: The case raises questions about the company's financial reporting practices and the potential for financial manipulation. The unauthorized bonuses could have been used to inflate the company's financial performance, potentially misleading investors and stakeholders.
  • Employee Incentives: The case highlights the potential risks associated with poorly designed employee incentive structures. The executive team's focus on short-term gains, rather than long-term sustainability, led to the unethical decision to award themselves bonuses despite the company's financial struggles.

4. Recommendations

To address the issues raised in the case, we recommend the following:

  1. Immediate Corrective Action: The Board of Directors should immediately demand the return of the unauthorized bonuses from the executive team. This action will demonstrate the Board's commitment to ethical conduct and financial transparency.
  2. Thorough Investigation: The Board should initiate a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding the unauthorized bonuses. This investigation should involve external auditors and legal counsel to ensure objectivity and transparency.
  3. Enhanced Internal Controls: The company should implement robust internal controls to prevent future occurrences of unauthorized bonus payments. This includes:
    • Clearer Policies and Procedures: Establish clear and comprehensive policies and procedures regarding bonus payments, including eligibility criteria, approval processes, and disclosure requirements.
    • Independent Audit and Review: Implement a system of independent audit and review of all bonus payments to ensure compliance with established policies and procedures.
    • Financial Reporting Transparency: Enhance financial reporting transparency by providing detailed information about bonus payments in the company's financial statements and related disclosures.
  4. Review of Corporate Governance Practices: The Board should conduct a thorough review of the company's corporate governance practices to identify and address any weaknesses that contributed to the unauthorized bonus payments. This review should include:
    • Board Composition and Independence: Ensure the Board is composed of independent and qualified directors with the necessary expertise to oversee the company's operations.
    • Board Oversight and Accountability: Strengthen the Board's oversight of the company's financial performance, risk management, and ethical conduct.
    • Compensation Committee Practices: Review the compensation committee's practices to ensure that executive compensation is aligned with the company's financial performance and ethical standards.
  5. Review of Employee Incentive Structures: The company should review its employee incentive structures to ensure they are aligned with the company's long-term goals and promote ethical behavior. This includes:
    • Performance Metrics: Ensure that performance metrics are aligned with the company's strategic goals and do not incentivize short-term gains at the expense of long-term sustainability.
    • Ethical Conduct: Incorporate ethical conduct as a key performance metric in employee incentive programs.
    • Transparency and Disclosure: Ensure that all employee incentive programs are transparent and disclosed to stakeholders.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following principles:

  • Ethical Conduct: Maintaining ethical conduct is paramount for any organization. The unauthorized bonus payments violated ethical standards and damaged the company's reputation.
  • Financial Transparency: Financial transparency is essential for building trust with investors, stakeholders, and the public. The company must ensure that its financial reporting is accurate and reliable.
  • Good Corporate Governance: Strong corporate governance practices are essential for ensuring ethical conduct, financial transparency, and long-term sustainability.
  • Effective Internal Controls: Robust internal controls are necessary to prevent financial irregularities and ensure compliance with established policies and procedures.

6. Conclusion

The unauthorized bonus payments at Houston Aerospace highlight the importance of ethical conduct, financial transparency, and strong corporate governance practices. By implementing the recommended actions, the company can restore trust with stakeholders, prevent future occurrences of unethical behavior, and ensure long-term sustainability.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives to the recommended actions include:

  • Ignoring the Issue: This option would be highly detrimental to the company's reputation and could lead to legal action by stakeholders.
  • Disciplinary Action: While disciplinary action against the executive team is necessary, it may not be sufficient to address the underlying issues.
  • Resignation of Executive Team: This option could be disruptive to the company's operations and may not address the root cause of the problem.

The key assumptions underlying these recommendations are:

  • Board's Commitment to Ethical Conduct: The Board is committed to upholding ethical standards and ensuring financial transparency.
  • Company's Ability to Implement Recommendations: The company has the resources and commitment to implement the recommended actions.
  • Stakeholders' Willingness to Forgive: Stakeholders are willing to forgive the company for past mistakes and support its efforts to improve its ethical conduct and financial transparency.

8. Next Steps

The following timeline outlines the key milestones for implementing the recommendations:

  • Week 1: The Board of Directors demands the return of the unauthorized bonuses and initiates a thorough investigation.
  • Week 2: The investigation team is assembled and begins its work.
  • Week 4: The Board reviews the findings of the investigation and determines appropriate disciplinary action.
  • Month 1: The company implements enhanced internal controls, including updated policies and procedures, independent audit and review, and increased financial reporting transparency.
  • Month 3: The Board completes its review of the company's corporate governance practices and implements necessary changes.
  • Month 6: The company reviews its employee incentive structures and makes adjustments to align them with long-term goals and ethical behavior.

By taking these steps, Houston Aerospace can address the ethical and financial issues raised in the case study and build a stronger foundation for future success.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

It was June of 2006, and Amanda Walsh, interim CFO, was soundly criticizing herself for not seeing the bigger picture of what had gone on during the previous 18 months at Vanderville Plastics Company (VPC). Two prior years' financials were still in draft form with auditors' statements showing that the firm might not be a going concern. Peter Giroux, the CFO who hired her, had kept Amanda from having any interaction with the company vice presidents, the board, or the owners, maintained a tight grip on both the human resources and payroll operations, and refused to provide details when she questioned him about any aspect of the financial operations. Then, in January of 2006, close to a million dollars in bonuses were paid to senior management and employees, despite the company's precarious cash flow position. Not long after the bonus payment Peter resigned unexpectedly. Today's phone call from Ken Duffy, one of the owners, made all the pieces fit together. Duffy had called for clarification about the sudden decrease in the company's accrued liabilities. The call ended abruptly when Amanda told him that bonuses were paid for performance in the previous 2005 fiscal year. His shocked reaction on the phone made it clear that the owners had not authorized the bonus payments. Amanda started to think about the succession of events since she came to VPC to better understand what this all meant, what was likely to happen next, and what she should do. The case exposes students to the day-to-day life of a professional accountant employed in a small business. COSO considers opportunistic behavior from senior management to secure incentive compensation by using adjusting journal entries the most likely way for fraud to occur. Looking at the events surrounding the payout as they unfold through in the day-to-day life of Amanda should help students develop the professional judgment and skepticism required to better interpret the oral assertions made by management,

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!

Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses! FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses! ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses! case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses! & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses! solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses! to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses! ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses! case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Houston We Have A Problem: They Paid Themselves Bonuses!




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.